Why Greenland Matters to the United States, and Why Some People Are Sceptical

8 January 2026

Paul Francis

Want your article or story on our site? Contact us here

Greenland has become an increasingly prominent part of global geopolitical discussion, particularly in relation to the United States. On the surface, the interest can appear puzzling. Greenland has a small population, harsh conditions, and limited infrastructure. Yet for Washington, it represents one of the most strategically significant territories in the world.

Snow-covered mountains and rocky peaks rise above a deep blue sea, under a clear sky, creating a serene and majestic landscape.

At the same time, recent events elsewhere have led many observers to question whether security alone explains American interest in regions rich in natural resources. Greenland now sits at the intersection of strategic necessity and public scepticism.

Greenland’s strategic importance to US security

The primary and most consistently stated reason for US interest in Greenland is security.

Greenland occupies a crucial geographic position between North America and Europe. It sits along the shortest route for ballistic missiles travelling between Russia and the United States. This makes it essential for early warning systems and missile defence.

The US has maintained a military presence in Greenland since the Second World War. Today, Pituffik Space Base plays a key role in monitoring missile launches, tracking satellites, and supporting NATO defence architecture. These systems are designed to protect not only the United States but also its allies.

As Arctic ice continues to melt, the region is becoming more accessible to military and commercial activity. Russia has expanded its Arctic bases, and China has declared itself a near-Arctic state. From Washington’s perspective, maintaining influence in Greenland helps prevent rivals from gaining a foothold in a region that directly affects North Atlantic security.

The Arctic, climate change, and future competition

Climate change has transformed Greenland’s relevance. What was once largely inaccessible is now opening up.

New shipping routes could shorten trade paths between Asia, Europe, and North America. Scientific research, undersea cables, and surveillance infrastructure are all becoming more viable. Greenland’s location places it at the centre of these emerging routes.

For the United States, this makes Greenland less of a remote territory and more of a forward position in an increasingly contested region.

Red Mobil barrel secured with ropes on wood structure, against a cloudy sky. Blue pipes and rusty metal bar in background.

Oil and resource speculation as a secondary factor

While security dominates official policy discussions, resource speculation is often raised as an additional reason for interest in Greenland.

Greenland is believed to hold potential offshore oil and gas reserves, as well as deposits of rare earth elements, lithium, graphite, and other critical minerals. These materials are essential for electronics, renewable energy systems, and defence technologies.

It is important to note that Greenland currently restricts new oil and gas exploration licences, largely due to environmental concerns. Large-scale extraction remains difficult, expensive, and politically sensitive.

For the United States, oil is not a strategic necessity in Greenland. The country is already one of the world’s largest oil producers. However, critical minerals are a longer-term concern. The US remains heavily dependent on foreign supply chains, particularly from China, for many of these materials.

This makes Greenland attractive as a potential future partner rather than an immediate resource solution.

Why scepticism exists

Despite official explanations, scepticism persists, and not without reason.

In recent years, the United States has taken highly visible actions elsewhere that involved control over oil production and transport. These actions have reinforced a long-standing public perception that resource interests sometimes sit beneath security justifications.

The Iraq War remains a powerful reference point. Although the official rationale focused on weapons and security threats, the protection and control of oil fields became a defining feature of the conflict in the public imagination. That perception continues to shape how many people interpret US foreign policy today.

More recently, actions involving sanctions, tanker seizures, and control of oil revenues in other regions have revived these concerns. When military or economic pressure coincides with resource-rich territories, scepticism follows.

Against this backdrop, even legitimate security interests can be viewed through a lens of historical mistrust.

Greenland is not Iraq, but history shapes perception

Greenland differs significantly from past conflict zones. It is an autonomous territory within the Kingdom of Denmark, a NATO ally. The United States does not dispute Danish sovereignty and has repeatedly stated that Greenland’s future must be decided by its people.

US engagement in Greenland has focused on diplomacy, scientific cooperation, and defence partnerships rather than intervention. There has been no military conflict, no occupation, and no attempt to forcibly extract resources.

However, history matters. Public opinion is shaped not only by current actions but by patterns over time. When people see strategic interest combined with resource potential, they naturally draw comparisons.

Denmark’s role as a stabilising factor

Denmark plays a crucial role in shaping how Greenland is engaged internationally. As the sovereign state responsible for defence and foreign policy, Denmark ensures that US involvement occurs within established legal and diplomatic frameworks.

This partnership reduces the likelihood of unilateral action and helps keep Greenland’s development aligned with environmental standards and local governance.

The broader reality

Greenland’s importance to the United States is real, and it is primarily rooted in geography and defence. Resource speculation exists, but it is not the driving force behind current policy.

At the same time, scepticism is understandable. History has taught many people to question official narratives when strategic interests and natural resources overlap.

The truth lies in the tension between these two realities. Greenland matters because of where it is, what it enables, and what it may one day provide. How it is treated will determine whether it becomes a model of cooperation or another chapter in a long story of mistrust.

Greenland is not a prize to be taken, but a partner to be engaged. Whether that distinction holds in the long term will depend not just on policy statements, but on actions.

In a world shaped by climate change, great power competition, and historical memory, even legitimate interests must contend with the weight of the past.

Current Most Read

Why Netflix Is Circling Warner Bros, and How a Century-Old Studio Reached This Point

What Christmas 2025 Revealed About the Future of Consoles

Unwrapping Joy: Office Favourites for the Ultimate Christmas Playlist

Connor Banks
Dec 18, 2023
3 min read

Christmas is once again upon us! And is there anything that gets people into the Christmas spirit more than Christmas music? Every year we all dust off the old classics, but everyone has their favourites that always get them into that Christmas spirit which is why I surveyed the office for everyone's favourite Christmas songs!

Paul:

Paul’s favourite Christmas Song is the 1978 Christmas Hit “Christmas Wrapping” by The Waitresses. "Christmas Wrapping" by the Waitresses is a holiday song that originated from a request by their record label, Ze Records, for a Christmas record. Written by Chris Butler, the guitarist and songwriter, the song features a sarcastic and tongue-in-cheek attitude toward Christmas. The lyrics tell the story of two people meeting during the holiday season, with humorous references to small turkeys and supermarket chains. Despite initial reluctance, the song became a surprise hit, showcasing a mix of influences from the New York music scene, including elements of rap and funk. The catchy and humorous nature of "Christmas Wrapping" has made it a memorable and enduring holiday classic.

Ellie:

"Merry Christmas Everyone” is Ellie’s favourite Christmas song.

"Merry Christmas Everyone" is a festive and upbeat Christmas song performed by Shakin' Stevens. Written by Bob Heatlie and produced by Dave Edmunds, it was initially meant for release in 1984 but was delayed a year to avoid competing with other high-profile Christmas releases. The song's music video, filmed in Sweden, features a young girl named Samantha visiting 'Santaworld' and meeting Shakin' Stevens. The song topped the UK charts in 1985, becoming Shakin' Stevens' fourth number-one hit. With its catchy tune and holiday spirit, "Merry Christmas Everyone" remains a beloved classic and a staple in Christmas music playlists.

Chloe:

A much more modern song, Chloe’s favourite is Arianna Grande’s “Santa Tell Me”.

"Santa Tell Me" by Ariana Grande is a Christmas song where the singer seeks guidance from Santa Claus regarding matters of the heart. She expresses a wish not to fall in love hastily and asks for assurance that the romantic relationship will endure. The song is thought to reflect Ariana Grande's personal experiences, particularly her hesitation about entering a new relationship with rapper Big Sean shortly after ending her previous one with YouTuber Jai Brooks. The lyrics convey a sense of caution and a desire for certainty in matters of love during the holiday season.

Clynton:

Clynton’s favourite Christmas song is the 1980 hit “Stop The Cavalry” by Jona Lewie. "Stop The Cavalry" by Jona Lewie originally had no Christmas theme, focusing on soldiers in the Crimean War and later expanded to encompass the broader context of all wars, particularly World War I. Released in the summer, it topped the French charts as an anti-war song. The Christmas connection was added later, drawing on the historical significance of the Christmas truce during World War I. The song narrates a soldier's desire to be home for Christmas, emphasising the loneliness and harsh conditions faced on the front lines. Stiff Records recognized its potential as a Christmas hit and, in a festive transformation, incorporated a Salvation Army brass band playing kazoo parts and a tubular bell to enhance its Christmassy vibe. Despite reaching number 3 in the UK charts in 1980, the song faced tough competition from St Winifreds School Choir and John Lennon, securing its place in musical history as a beloved, albeit unconventional, Christmas classic.

Connor:

The Darkness’s “Christmas Time (Don't Let the Bells End)” is what takes Connor’s favourite Christmas Song spot. "Christmas Time (Don't Let the Bells End)" by The Darkness is a playful departure from traditional Christmas songs, featuring Justin Hawkins' signature falsettos and a humorous tone consistent with the band's style. The lyrics incorporate typical festive references, including Santa Claus and bells, while maintaining a parody element. The backing vocals are provided by a school choir from Haberdashers' Aske's Hatcham College in New Cross, London, with ties to the band members' family history. The song's humour extends to a clever double entendre in the line 'Bells End' and 'Ring in peace,' injecting a cheeky and irreverent twist into the Christmas theme. Overall, The Darkness combines traditional holiday elements with their unique humour and musical flair in this unconventional Christmas song.