Why Greenland Matters to the United States, and Why Some People Are Sceptical

8 January 2026

Paul Francis

Want your article or story on our site? Contact us here

Greenland has become an increasingly prominent part of global geopolitical discussion, particularly in relation to the United States. On the surface, the interest can appear puzzling. Greenland has a small population, harsh conditions, and limited infrastructure. Yet for Washington, it represents one of the most strategically significant territories in the world.

Snow-covered mountains and rocky peaks rise above a deep blue sea, under a clear sky, creating a serene and majestic landscape.

At the same time, recent events elsewhere have led many observers to question whether security alone explains American interest in regions rich in natural resources. Greenland now sits at the intersection of strategic necessity and public scepticism.

Greenland’s strategic importance to US security

The primary and most consistently stated reason for US interest in Greenland is security.

Greenland occupies a crucial geographic position between North America and Europe. It sits along the shortest route for ballistic missiles travelling between Russia and the United States. This makes it essential for early warning systems and missile defence.

The US has maintained a military presence in Greenland since the Second World War. Today, Pituffik Space Base plays a key role in monitoring missile launches, tracking satellites, and supporting NATO defence architecture. These systems are designed to protect not only the United States but also its allies.

As Arctic ice continues to melt, the region is becoming more accessible to military and commercial activity. Russia has expanded its Arctic bases, and China has declared itself a near-Arctic state. From Washington’s perspective, maintaining influence in Greenland helps prevent rivals from gaining a foothold in a region that directly affects North Atlantic security.

The Arctic, climate change, and future competition

Climate change has transformed Greenland’s relevance. What was once largely inaccessible is now opening up.

New shipping routes could shorten trade paths between Asia, Europe, and North America. Scientific research, undersea cables, and surveillance infrastructure are all becoming more viable. Greenland’s location places it at the centre of these emerging routes.

For the United States, this makes Greenland less of a remote territory and more of a forward position in an increasingly contested region.

Red Mobil barrel secured with ropes on wood structure, against a cloudy sky. Blue pipes and rusty metal bar in background.

Oil and resource speculation as a secondary factor

While security dominates official policy discussions, resource speculation is often raised as an additional reason for interest in Greenland.

Greenland is believed to hold potential offshore oil and gas reserves, as well as deposits of rare earth elements, lithium, graphite, and other critical minerals. These materials are essential for electronics, renewable energy systems, and defence technologies.

It is important to note that Greenland currently restricts new oil and gas exploration licences, largely due to environmental concerns. Large-scale extraction remains difficult, expensive, and politically sensitive.

For the United States, oil is not a strategic necessity in Greenland. The country is already one of the world’s largest oil producers. However, critical minerals are a longer-term concern. The US remains heavily dependent on foreign supply chains, particularly from China, for many of these materials.

This makes Greenland attractive as a potential future partner rather than an immediate resource solution.

Why scepticism exists

Despite official explanations, scepticism persists, and not without reason.

In recent years, the United States has taken highly visible actions elsewhere that involved control over oil production and transport. These actions have reinforced a long-standing public perception that resource interests sometimes sit beneath security justifications.

The Iraq War remains a powerful reference point. Although the official rationale focused on weapons and security threats, the protection and control of oil fields became a defining feature of the conflict in the public imagination. That perception continues to shape how many people interpret US foreign policy today.

More recently, actions involving sanctions, tanker seizures, and control of oil revenues in other regions have revived these concerns. When military or economic pressure coincides with resource-rich territories, scepticism follows.

Against this backdrop, even legitimate security interests can be viewed through a lens of historical mistrust.

Greenland is not Iraq, but history shapes perception

Greenland differs significantly from past conflict zones. It is an autonomous territory within the Kingdom of Denmark, a NATO ally. The United States does not dispute Danish sovereignty and has repeatedly stated that Greenland’s future must be decided by its people.

US engagement in Greenland has focused on diplomacy, scientific cooperation, and defence partnerships rather than intervention. There has been no military conflict, no occupation, and no attempt to forcibly extract resources.

However, history matters. Public opinion is shaped not only by current actions but by patterns over time. When people see strategic interest combined with resource potential, they naturally draw comparisons.

Denmark’s role as a stabilising factor

Denmark plays a crucial role in shaping how Greenland is engaged internationally. As the sovereign state responsible for defence and foreign policy, Denmark ensures that US involvement occurs within established legal and diplomatic frameworks.

This partnership reduces the likelihood of unilateral action and helps keep Greenland’s development aligned with environmental standards and local governance.

The broader reality

Greenland’s importance to the United States is real, and it is primarily rooted in geography and defence. Resource speculation exists, but it is not the driving force behind current policy.

At the same time, scepticism is understandable. History has taught many people to question official narratives when strategic interests and natural resources overlap.

The truth lies in the tension between these two realities. Greenland matters because of where it is, what it enables, and what it may one day provide. How it is treated will determine whether it becomes a model of cooperation or another chapter in a long story of mistrust.

Greenland is not a prize to be taken, but a partner to be engaged. Whether that distinction holds in the long term will depend not just on policy statements, but on actions.

In a world shaped by climate change, great power competition, and historical memory, even legitimate interests must contend with the weight of the past.

Current Most Read

Why Netflix Is Circling Warner Bros, and How a Century-Old Studio Reached This Point

What Christmas 2025 Revealed About the Future of Consoles

The Oasis Reunion: Fans in Frenzy as Gallagher Brothers Reignite the Flame

Connor Banks
Sep 4, 2024
3 min read

The Unbelievable Happened

In a twist that no one saw coming, Oasis, the band that defined British rock in the '90s, is reuniting. Liam and Noel Gallagher are putting aside their infamous feud (for now) to bring the music back. For fans who’ve spent the last 15 years holding onto the hope that this day would come, the announcement felt like a dream come true. But as with anything involving the Gallaghers, the news has sparked a whirlwind of reactions, ranging from pure elation to utter disbelief.

Social Media Erupts: A Collective Cheer and a Few Chuckles

As soon as the reunion was confirmed, social media practically melted down. For many, the return of Oasis is a cultural event on par with the second coming exaggeration, perhaps, but the passion is real. Fans immediately flooded platforms like Twitter and Instagram with a mix of memes, nostalgic tributes, and tongue-in-cheek comments. One particularly viral post quipped, "The world has healed," a sentiment echoed by thousands who saw the reunion as a sign of better times ahead.

Ticketmaster Chaos: The Price of Nostalgia

The initial euphoria was soon tempered by frustration as fans tried to get their hands on tickets. The rush to secure seats for what’s being dubbed "the reunion of the century" led to widespread complaints about Ticketmaster’s handling of sales. The site crashed repeatedly under the demand, leaving many fans fuming. Worse still, Ticketmaster’s controversial dynamic pricing system sent ticket costs soaring, with some fans reporting prices jumping to as much as £415 for standard seats. The backlash was swift, with many calling for an investigation into the fairness of these practices.

Yet, despite the outrage, tickets for the reunion shows sold out almost instantly. For those lucky enough to snag one, the anticipation is palpable. For the rest, the hope of additional dates rumoured to be in the works offers a glimmer of hope.

From Celebrities to Supermarkets: Everyone Has Something to Say

It’s not just the fans who are buzzing. Celebrities and public figures have been quick to join in the conversation. Manchester’s Mayor, Andy Burnham, took to social media to declare that the city was "having another moment," hinting at the cultural resurgence that the Oasis reunion could spark. Even brands got in on the actionJohn Lewis cheekily noted a spike in searches for bucket hats, a nod to Liam’s enduring influence on British fashion.

And then there are the musical tributes. Irish pop duo Jedward celebrated the news with a cover of "Wonderwall," a moment that perfectly encapsulated the blend of reverence and lightheartedness that surrounds Oasis’s music. The reunion isn’t just a big deal for rock fans; it’s a cultural event that’s resonating across the board.

The Fans’ Perspective: This Means Everything

For Oasis fans, this reunion is much more than a concert tour; it's a chance to reconnect with a band that shaped their lives. The band’s music, with its raw emotion and anthemic sound, captured the spirit of a generation. Songs like "Live Forever" and "Don’t Look Back in Anger" are more than just tracks; they’re the soundtrack to countless personal stories. The thought of hearing those songs live again, with Liam’s gravelly voice and Noel’s impeccable guitar work, is enough to bring grown men to tears.

But this reunion also comes with a sense of trepidation. The Gallaghers are famous for their volatility, and many fans are wondering whether the brothers can keep it together for the entire tour. There’s a certain thrill in the unpredictability, though after all, part of Oasis’s appeal has always been the drama. As one fan wryly noted on Twitter, "Oasis is back, and so is the drama. I wouldn’t miss it for the world."

Conclusion: The Rollercoaster Begins

As the world prepares for Oasis’s return in 2025, one thing is clear: this reunion is already making history. Whether it will lead to new music or simply serve as a nostalgic farewell, the impact is undeniable. Fans are gearing up for what could be the most talked-about tour of the decade, and the world is watching to see if the Gallaghers can pull it off.