top of page
Why Some Websites May Leave the UK Over Online Safety Rules

Why Some Websites May Leave the UK Over Online Safety Rules

4 September 2025

Paul Francis

Want your article or story on our site? Contact us here

The UK’s Online Safety Act, passed in 2023, is beginning to reshape how people experience the internet in Britain. While much of the legislation has yet to come into force, some of its requirements are already being felt. With stricter rules set to take effect in September, questions are being raised about whether the UK’s digital landscape could be permanently changed.


Blue fiber optic cables emit glowing light with a dark background, creating a futuristic and dynamic atmosphere.

At its core, the Act is designed to make online spaces safer by holding tech platforms accountable for harmful content. This means services of all sizes, from global giants to small community forums, must assess and mitigate risks such as child exploitation, harassment, misinformation, and access to adult material. But how these responsibilities are enforced, and whether every platform is willing or able to comply, is where the complications begin.


Early Changes and Adjustments

Some companies have already begun reshaping how their services work in the UK. Steam, one of the world’s largest video game platforms, recently introduced a stricter credit card verification system in Britain, designed to restrict under-18s from accessing adult-rated games. Other platforms have implemented stronger age checks or limited features that could expose children to inappropriate material.


Smartphone displaying the Steam logo against a wooden background, featuring game thumbnails. Predominantly dark tones and tech-focused mood.
Steam has introduced stricter Credit Card verification

Not every company is willing to adapt, however. Wikipedia has openly questioned whether it can realistically comply with the Act. Its non-profit structure, reliance on volunteer moderation, and commitment to user privacy make it unlikely to adopt age verification or sweeping content controls. The Wikimedia Foundation has warned that if forced to implement intrusive measures, it may consider withdrawing services from the UK altogether.


Resistance and Concerns

It is not just Wikipedia sounding alarms. Smaller online communities and specialist forums argue that the Act favours large, well-funded platforms that can afford to build complex moderation systems. For independent websites, compliance could mean costly technical overhauls or the risk of heavy fines. There are fears that some may choose to block UK users rather than take on new legal and financial risks.


Laptop screen showing the Wikipedia homepage in a web browser. Background is softly blurred with warm tones, suggesting a cozy indoor setting.
Wikipedia has warned it may withdraw services in the UK

Tech giants, meanwhile, have expressed their own reservations. While companies like Meta, TikTok, and X (formerly Twitter) have pledged to follow the law, they continue to push back against specific provisions, particularly those requiring proactive removal of harmful but legal content. Critics argue that this places platforms in the role of arbiters of free speech, forcing them to make subjective decisions under threat of penalty.


What Happens in September

The most significant shift is expected in September, when further stipulations of the Act are set to take effect. Age verification requirements for adult content sites are likely to be enforced, echoing earlier debates around proposed online pornography restrictions that collapsed in 2019. This time, however, the rules come with more teeth: websites that fail to comply could face fines of up to 10% of global revenue or even be blocked entirely by UK internet providers.


The introduction of these measures could see a wave of disruption. Adult content platforms, gambling sites, and online services with mature-rated material are likely to be most immediately affected. But ripple effects may extend much further, impacting creative communities, independent publishers, and even gaming services if strict verification rules are applied broadly.


The Future of the UK Internet

Supporters of the Online Safety Act argue that these changes are long overdue. They point to the harm caused by online abuse, the easy availability of explicit material, and the difficulty parents face in monitoring children’s digital lives. For them, forcing platforms to take responsibility is a necessary step toward a safer internet.


Gamer with headphones focused on a video game. Colorful keyboard, intense screen reflections, dim gaming room setting.

Opponents counter that the measures are heavy-handed and risk creating a two-tier internet where UK users are cut off from parts of the global web. They warn that age verification systems could undermine privacy, increase data risks, and erode digital freedoms. If major services were to withdraw or limit access, Britain could find itself with a diminished internet compared to the rest of the world.


As September approaches, the question is less about whether the Act will change the internet in the UK, but by how much. What began as a promise to protect users may well mark the start of a more fragmented and tightly controlled online experience, one where availability and freedom depend on a platform’s ability — or willingness — to comply.

Current Most Read

Why Some Websites May Leave the UK Over Online Safety Rules
WWE Clash in Paris 2025 Review
The Simpsons: From Springfield to the World

The Simpsons: From Springfield to the World

  • Writer: Paul Francis
    Paul Francis
  • 1 day ago
  • 4 min read

Few television shows can claim to have shaped popular culture in the way The Simpsons has. First appearing in 1989 as a half-hour series, it has since become the longest-running animated sitcom in history, spanning more than three decades, with over 750 episodes to its name. Broadcast in more than 100 countries and translated into dozens of languages, the adventures of Homer, Marge, Bart, Lisa and Maggie have reached audiences in almost every corner of the globe.


Sign of a clown holding a burger with text "Krusty Burger" in bright red neon. The background has an orange building and cloudy sky.

The show has been dubbed in everything from Spanish and Arabic to Mandarin and Hindi, with some countries even localising jokes to suit regional humour. It is difficult to overstate the global footprint of Springfield’s most famous family. What began as a quirky cartoon short has become one of the most recognisable and enduring cultural exports from the United States.


The Origins of Springfield

The Simpsons was created by cartoonist Matt Groening, who first rose to fame with his underground comic strip Life in Hell. These hand-drawn comics, filled with sharp observations about life, relationships and the darker sides of modern existence, attracted a cult following. When television producer James L. Brooks asked Groening to create a series of short animated skits for The Tracey Ullman Show, Groening instead pitched a brand-new idea to avoid losing the rights to his comic strip.


The result was The Simpsons, a set of animated shorts that quickly gained popularity. In 1989, the characters were developed into their own half-hour programme on the Fox network, and television history was made.


A Family in Name and Spirit

Much of The Simpsons’ early appeal came from its relatability. The family members were deliberately imperfect, flawed and far from the pristine characters often found in American television sitcoms of the 1980s. Groening based the names of the main characters on his own family. Homer and Marge were borrowed directly from his parents, while Lisa and Maggie came from his sisters.


Bart, however, was different. Groening admitted that he originally considered naming Bart after himself, but thought it would be too obvious. Instead, he chose “Bart”, which is an anagram of “brat”, perfectly capturing the rebellious and mischievous nature of the eldest Simpson child.


Cartoon family sitting on an orange couch eating snacks. Characters have yellow skin, blue, green, and orange clothes on a white shirt.

Controversy and Criticism

With its rise in fame came criticism. Politicians and parents’ groups in the early 1990s accused Bart of being a poor role model for children, with his catchphrases like “Eat my shorts!” and “Don’t have a cow, man” considered disrespectful. At the time, then-US President George H. W. Bush famously commented that he wanted American families to be “more like the Waltons, and less like the Simpsons”.


Over the years, more serious controversies have followed. Certain episodes have been banned or removed from circulation. For instance, the episode “Stark Raving Dad”, featuring guest star Michael Jackson, was pulled from broadcast and streaming platforms after renewed scrutiny of the singer’s personal life.


Perhaps the most debated issue in recent years has been the character of Apu Nahasapeemapetilon, voiced by Hank Azaria. Critics argued that Apu perpetuated negative stereotypes about South Asians, particularly through his exaggerated accent and mannerisms. Following a documentary titled The Problem with Apu, Azaria stepped down from the role in 2020, and The Simpsons pledged that white actors would no longer voice characters of colour.


Cultural Impact and Positive Influence

For all the controversy, it is impossible to deny the show’s cultural impact. The Simpsons has tackled subjects ranging from politics and religion to the environment and technology, often using satire to make viewers reflect on real-world issues. The show’s humour has educated as well as entertained, with episodes addressing social inequality, climate change and even the workings of democracy.


Its influence on television comedy has been immense, paving the way for shows such as Family Guy, South Park, and Rick and Morty. Countless comedians and writers cite it as a formative influence, while entire university courses have been devoted to analysing its social commentary.


The Simpsons has also contributed to charitable causes, whether through themed merchandise, fundraising events, or special episodes. Despite being a cartoon family, Homer and Marge have, in their own way, helped to raise awareness of important global topics.


Original Simpsons intro from 1990-2008

Can The Simpsons Predict the Future?

One of the most enduring and entertaining internet phenomena around The Simpsons is the idea that it can predict the future. Fans have pointed to episodes that appear to foreshadow real events, from Donald Trump’s presidency to Disney’s purchase of 20th Century Fox. Others highlight the show’s apparent foresight in creating smartwatches, video calls, and even London’s Shard skyscraper before they became reality.


Some of these claims are coincidences, others are exaggerations, and a few are internet fabrications. Yet the sheer number of so-called “predictions” has given rise to memes suggesting that The Simpsons is modern television’s equivalent of Nostradamus. The truth is less mystical. The show’s writers often take existing trends and push them to absurd extremes. Given enough time and episodes, some of those extremes end up looking surprisingly accurate.


An Enduring Legacy

From its humble beginnings as a quirky sketch to its global reach today, The Simpsons has transformed the landscape of television. It has courted controversy, broken barriers in comedy, entertained millions and sparked endless debate. Its uncanny knack for being ahead of the curve only adds to its mythology.


Whether seen as biting satire, comfort television, or a bizarre oracle of the future, Springfield’s most famous family remains a cultural touchstone unlike any other.

bottom of page