top of page
Why You Should Not Trust Your Car’s Automatic Systems Completely

Why You Should Not Trust Your Car’s Automatic Systems Completely

12 February 2026

Paul Francis

Want your article or story on our site? Contact us here

Most modern drivers assume that if a feature is labelled “automatic”, it will take care of itself. Automatic lights. Automatic braking. Automatic lane correction. The car feels intelligent, almost watchful.


Car dashboard at night with blurred city lights in the background. Speedometer glows blue. Display shows 8:39. Moody, urban setting.

But there is a quiet issue that many drivers are unaware of, and it begins with something as simple as headlights.


The automatic headlight problem

In fog, heavy rain or dull grey daylight, many cars will show illuminated front lights but leave the rear of the vehicle dark. From inside the car, everything appears normal. The dashboard is lit. The automatic light symbol is active. You can see light reflecting ahead.


However, what often happens is that the vehicle is running on daytime running lights rather than full dipped headlights. On many cars, daytime running lights only operate at the front. The rear lights remain off unless the dipped headlights are manually switched on.

The system relies on a light sensor that measures brightness, not visibility. Fog does not always make the environment dark enough to trigger full headlights. Heavy motorway spray can reduce visibility dramatically while still registering as daylight. The result is a vehicle that is difficult to see from behind, especially at speed.


Under the Highway Code, drivers must use headlights when visibility is seriously reduced. Automatic systems do not override that responsibility. In poor weather, manual control is often the safer choice. It is a small action that can make a significant difference.


Automatic emergency braking is not foolproof

Automatic Emergency Braking, often referred to as AEB, is one of the most widely praised safety technologies in modern vehicles. It is designed to detect obstacles and apply the brakes if a collision appears imminent.


In controlled testing, it reduces certain types of crashes. But it is not infallible. Cameras and radar can struggle in heavy rain, low sun glare, fog, or when sensors are obstructed by dirt or ice. Some systems have difficulty detecting stationary vehicles at high speed. Others may not recognise pedestrians at certain angles.


It is a safety net, not a guarantee.


Lane assist is not autopilot

Lane keeping systems gently steer the car back into its lane if it detects a drift. On clear motorways with bright road markings, they can work well.


On rural roads, in roadworks, or where markings are faded, they can disengage or behave unpredictably. Drivers may not even realise when the system has switched off. Over time, there is a risk that drivers become less attentive, assuming the vehicle will correct mistakes.

It will not.


Cars drive on a wet highway during sunset. The sky is golden, and trees line the road. The scene is viewed through a windshield.

Adaptive cruise control still requires full attention

Adaptive cruise control maintains speed and distance from the car ahead. It is comfortable on long motorway journeys.


However, it does not anticipate hazards like a human driver. It can brake sharply when another vehicle exits your lane. It may not react appropriately to a fast vehicle cutting in. Most importantly, it does not read the wider context of traffic conditions.


It reduces workload, but it does not remove responsibility.


Blind spot monitoring is not perfect

Blind spot indicators are helpful, especially in heavy traffic. They provide an extra warning when another vehicle is alongside you.


But motorcycles, fast approaching cars, or vehicles at unusual angles can sometimes escape detection. Sensors can also be affected by weather or dirt. A physical shoulder check remains essential.


Cameras distort reality

Reversing cameras and parking sensors have reduced low-speed bumps and scrapes. They are undeniably useful.


Yet cameras distort depth perception, and small or low obstacles can be difficult to judge accurately. Relying entirely on the screen rather than physically checking surroundings is one of the most common causes of minor accidents.


The bigger risk is complacency

There is a growing concern among safety researchers about automation complacency. When systems work well most of the time, drivers begin to relax. Attention drifts. Reaction times lengthen.


Modern vehicles are safer than ever, but the technology is designed to support an attentive driver. It is not designed to replace one.


The word “assist” appears frequently in the naming of these systems for a reason. They assist. They do not assume control.


Automatic lights, braking, steering correction and cruise systems are impressive pieces of engineering. They reduce risk. They improve comfort. But they still require a human driver who understands their limits.


Trusting technology is reasonable. Trusting it completely is not.

Current Most Read

Why You Should Not Trust Your Car’s Automatic Systems Completely
The Property Industry Is Going Remote — But Is It For The Better?
US Naval Pursuit and Seizure of Oil Tanker in the Indian Ocean: What It Means

The Town That Trained Seagulls to Queue

  • Writer: Paul Francis
    Paul Francis
  • Jul 7, 2025
  • 2 min read

In the sleepy seaside town of Cleaves-on-Sea, population just under 9,000, an unexpected local initiative has caught national attention. This isn't about green energy, improved public transport or a cultural renaissance. It's about seagulls. Specifically, it's about teaching them to queue.


Yes, queue.


For the past five years, residents of Cleaves-on-Sea have been engaged in an unusual project: encouraging the local seagull population to adopt British queuing etiquette. It began as a joke, then became a community experiment, and now, locals swear by its success.


A Bird-Brained Idea?

The initiative started with Jim Roscoe, a retired postman and lifelong resident. Known affectionately as “Postie Jim,” he spent most of his days feeding birds from the same bench near the promenade.


“I was sick of them diving at tourists,” Jim says. “They’d nick chips, ice cream, even once a baby’s dummy. It wasn’t right.”

Seagull with white and gray plumage against a clear blue sky, looking calmly to the side.

So Jim began a simple experiment. He fed only those gulls who remained at a respectful distance. He even placed markers—sticks at first, then painted lines—to show where the birds should stand.


“It was daft at first,” he admits. “But over time, I noticed they started getting the message. The ones who waited got fed. The greedy ones missed out.”


Word spread. Locals began helping. Yellow lines appeared across the promenade. Signs read, “Queue Here for Chips – Gulls Welcome.” Children took turns policing the queue with toy whistles. One local café even began offering “queue treats” to well-behaved birds.


Seagull Psychology?

While some might dismiss it as folklore, Dr. Sarah Densmore, an animal behaviourist from the University of Exeter, says there may be some truth to it.


“Gulls are highly intelligent and opportunistic. They’re capable of pattern recognition and basic learning,” she explains. “If a community consistently rewards certain behaviours, even wild animals may adapt. Especially ones as socially driven as gulls.”


Dr. Densmore visited Cleaves-on-Sea last summer and confirmed that gulls were, unusually, standing in a loose but visible line near key food spots.


“There was order. I won’t call it a queue in the British sense, but something resembling it. In gull terms, that's remarkable.”

Tourists and Tradition

Local businesses have embraced the fame. The Gull & Chips café now sells commemorative mugs with a queue of cartoon birds, and a new mural was unveiled in April showing seagulls politely queuing for ice cream. Tourists flock to see the spectacle, hoping to witness this bizarre display of coastal civility.


“It’s bonkers, but it works,” says Sharon Whitby, who runs the town’s small tourism board. “We’re famous for it now. Better this than a pier ghost story.”


There are, of course, doubters. Some say the gulls are just waiting due to food scarcity, or that the perceived queuing is more coincidence than learning. But for Cleaves-on-Sea, the truth doesn’t matter so much as the charm of the story.


“If you’ve lived here long enough, you see them change,” says Jim, tossing a chip to a waiting bird. “They’re like us. They just needed a bit of encouragement to mind their manners.”


And in a country known for orderly queues, perhaps it’s only fitting that even the wildlife learns to fall in line.

bottom of page