Why Greenland Matters to the United States, and Why Some People Are Sceptical

8 January 2026

Paul Francis

Want your article or story on our site? Contact us here

Greenland has become an increasingly prominent part of global geopolitical discussion, particularly in relation to the United States. On the surface, the interest can appear puzzling. Greenland has a small population, harsh conditions, and limited infrastructure. Yet for Washington, it represents one of the most strategically significant territories in the world.

Snow-covered mountains and rocky peaks rise above a deep blue sea, under a clear sky, creating a serene and majestic landscape.

At the same time, recent events elsewhere have led many observers to question whether security alone explains American interest in regions rich in natural resources. Greenland now sits at the intersection of strategic necessity and public scepticism.

Greenland’s strategic importance to US security

The primary and most consistently stated reason for US interest in Greenland is security.

Greenland occupies a crucial geographic position between North America and Europe. It sits along the shortest route for ballistic missiles travelling between Russia and the United States. This makes it essential for early warning systems and missile defence.

The US has maintained a military presence in Greenland since the Second World War. Today, Pituffik Space Base plays a key role in monitoring missile launches, tracking satellites, and supporting NATO defence architecture. These systems are designed to protect not only the United States but also its allies.

As Arctic ice continues to melt, the region is becoming more accessible to military and commercial activity. Russia has expanded its Arctic bases, and China has declared itself a near-Arctic state. From Washington’s perspective, maintaining influence in Greenland helps prevent rivals from gaining a foothold in a region that directly affects North Atlantic security.

The Arctic, climate change, and future competition

Climate change has transformed Greenland’s relevance. What was once largely inaccessible is now opening up.

New shipping routes could shorten trade paths between Asia, Europe, and North America. Scientific research, undersea cables, and surveillance infrastructure are all becoming more viable. Greenland’s location places it at the centre of these emerging routes.

For the United States, this makes Greenland less of a remote territory and more of a forward position in an increasingly contested region.

Red Mobil barrel secured with ropes on wood structure, against a cloudy sky. Blue pipes and rusty metal bar in background.

Oil and resource speculation as a secondary factor

While security dominates official policy discussions, resource speculation is often raised as an additional reason for interest in Greenland.

Greenland is believed to hold potential offshore oil and gas reserves, as well as deposits of rare earth elements, lithium, graphite, and other critical minerals. These materials are essential for electronics, renewable energy systems, and defence technologies.

It is important to note that Greenland currently restricts new oil and gas exploration licences, largely due to environmental concerns. Large-scale extraction remains difficult, expensive, and politically sensitive.

For the United States, oil is not a strategic necessity in Greenland. The country is already one of the world’s largest oil producers. However, critical minerals are a longer-term concern. The US remains heavily dependent on foreign supply chains, particularly from China, for many of these materials.

This makes Greenland attractive as a potential future partner rather than an immediate resource solution.

Why scepticism exists

Despite official explanations, scepticism persists, and not without reason.

In recent years, the United States has taken highly visible actions elsewhere that involved control over oil production and transport. These actions have reinforced a long-standing public perception that resource interests sometimes sit beneath security justifications.

The Iraq War remains a powerful reference point. Although the official rationale focused on weapons and security threats, the protection and control of oil fields became a defining feature of the conflict in the public imagination. That perception continues to shape how many people interpret US foreign policy today.

More recently, actions involving sanctions, tanker seizures, and control of oil revenues in other regions have revived these concerns. When military or economic pressure coincides with resource-rich territories, scepticism follows.

Against this backdrop, even legitimate security interests can be viewed through a lens of historical mistrust.

Greenland is not Iraq, but history shapes perception

Greenland differs significantly from past conflict zones. It is an autonomous territory within the Kingdom of Denmark, a NATO ally. The United States does not dispute Danish sovereignty and has repeatedly stated that Greenland’s future must be decided by its people.

US engagement in Greenland has focused on diplomacy, scientific cooperation, and defence partnerships rather than intervention. There has been no military conflict, no occupation, and no attempt to forcibly extract resources.

However, history matters. Public opinion is shaped not only by current actions but by patterns over time. When people see strategic interest combined with resource potential, they naturally draw comparisons.

Denmark’s role as a stabilising factor

Denmark plays a crucial role in shaping how Greenland is engaged internationally. As the sovereign state responsible for defence and foreign policy, Denmark ensures that US involvement occurs within established legal and diplomatic frameworks.

This partnership reduces the likelihood of unilateral action and helps keep Greenland’s development aligned with environmental standards and local governance.

The broader reality

Greenland’s importance to the United States is real, and it is primarily rooted in geography and defence. Resource speculation exists, but it is not the driving force behind current policy.

At the same time, scepticism is understandable. History has taught many people to question official narratives when strategic interests and natural resources overlap.

The truth lies in the tension between these two realities. Greenland matters because of where it is, what it enables, and what it may one day provide. How it is treated will determine whether it becomes a model of cooperation or another chapter in a long story of mistrust.

Greenland is not a prize to be taken, but a partner to be engaged. Whether that distinction holds in the long term will depend not just on policy statements, but on actions.

In a world shaped by climate change, great power competition, and historical memory, even legitimate interests must contend with the weight of the past.

Current Most Read

Why Netflix Is Circling Warner Bros, and How a Century-Old Studio Reached This Point

What Christmas 2025 Revealed About the Future of Consoles

London for Young Professionals: Opportunity or Overrated?

Toby Patrick
Jul 17, 2025
3 min read

London is one of the world’s most popular cities, so it’s no surprise that it draws young professionals in droves. With a wealth of opportunities, both in and out of the workplace, it’s easy to see why young people are drawn to the UK’s capital. But now the work-from-home era is in full swing, many are asking if relocating to London is still worth it for young professionals. In this article, we will evaluate whether London still offers vast opportunities for young workers or if the city has become overrated.

Crowd at Waterloo Underground Station, walking towards train. Signs for Way Out and train lines visible. Dimly lit, busy mood.

Pros Of London For Young Professionals

Prosperous Job Market

We can argue about whether or not London still offers the same opportunities as 10 years ago, but there’s no denying that London still attracts the world’s biggest companies and the most innovative startups. As a result, the city still possesses a prosperous job market.

While you’ll find opportunities in any industry, London is perfect for those seeking careers in finance, property and creative industries. It’s also great for those looking to forge out a career as an entrepreneur due to the abundance of networking opportunities and access to capital.

Attractions

One of the best things about London is that you’ll never be short of things to do. If you’re a young professional, you’ll probably be concerned with how you spend your time outside of work. If you are concerned with this, you’ll be glad to hear that London offers a vibrant nightlife, an excellent restaurant scene and some of the world’s most famous tourist attractions.

Tower Bridge in London against a cloudy sky. The bridge is open with a red bus visible. River Thames flows below in a serene setting.

Transport Links

While London is one of the world’s busiest cities, it is helped by a reliable transport system. This includes London’s bus network and tube system, which can be a great help if you face a long commute every day.

While traffic is one of the few drawbacks of London, drivers are helped by an array of city centre car parks, which can be useful if your place of work doesn’t have on-site parking.

Cons Of London For Young Professionals

High Cost Of Living

While London is one of the best cities in the world, it certainly isn’t one of the cheapest. Transport, gym memberships and eating out are all above average, and that’s not to mention the cost of London property.

Buying property is out of reach for many young professionals in London, which means the rental market is extremely competitive. As a result, you can expect to pay over the odds for rental properties. Last year, a 1-bedroom city centre apartment would cost approximately £2,180 a month in rent.

Busy

Many people dream of moving to lively cities where they’re surrounded by hustle and bustle. For others, this is their idea of hell. If your dream location is one that is tranquil and quiet, London probably isn’t for you. Like other major cities, London doesn’t really sleep, and you’ll find yourself constantly surrounded by packed streets and bustling crowds.

Weather

Finally, how could we not mention the infamous British weather? If you’re a young professional moving to London, you’ll need to be prepared for cold winters and constant rainfall. While this may not be an issue for everyone, those who move to London from more tropical climates may be in for a slight culture shock when they start their new life in London.

Final Thoughts

London remains a fantastic city for young professionals. But does the city still offer bang for buck when so many people are searching for remote jobs? Whether or not London is right for you depends on your career goals, your personality and your interests — it also depends on how much you’ll be earning, as London is one of the world’s most expensive cities. If you’re a young professional living in London, let us know your thoughts!