top of page

Rebranding 101: Balancing Innovation and Tradition


Woman working on a brand

Rebranding can be a thrilling yet daunting process for any company. Whether it’s tweaking a logo, updating marketing materials, or completely overhauling a brand’s image, the goal is always to stay relevant, modern, and appealing to both current and potential customers. However, it's not always a straightforward journey.


The Need for Rebranding

Even the most established and successful businesses need to refresh their brands from time to time. Why? Because the market is constantly evolving, and what worked a few years ago might not resonate with today's consumers. Keeping up with trends and technological advancements is crucial for maintaining a competitive edge.


Some companies opt for a complete overhaul, while others prefer small, incremental changes. Coca-Cola is a prime example of a brand that has managed to stay relevant through subtle tweaks over time. Their logo has evolved, yet it retains the classic elements that make it instantly recognizable, proving that sometimes, less is more.


Successful Rebranding Examples

  1. Apple (1997): When Steve Jobs returned to Apple, he led a significant rebranding effort. The iconic, colourful striped apple logo was transformed into a sleek, monochromatic version. This shift signified a new era of innovation and sophistication, helping to reposition Apple as a leader in the tech industry and paving the way for its resurgence.

  2. Starbucks (2011): Starbucks simplified its logo by removing the words "Starbucks" and "Coffee," focusing solely on the iconic siren. This change reflected the brand's expansion beyond coffee into a broader lifestyle brand. The minimalist design reinforced Starbucks' global recognition and adaptability.

  3. Google (2015): Google updated its logo to a modern, sans-serif typeface that was more versatile and mobile-friendly. This change represented Google's evolution and its emphasis on digital and mobile platforms. The updated logo maintained the brand's playful and approachable image while enhancing its digital presence.


When Rebranding Misses the Mark

Rebranding can be risky, and sometimes it misses the mark entirely. This often happens when corporate leaders, disconnected from the brand's core identity, attempt to emulate the success of others without considering their own brand's unique attributes.

  1. Tropicana (2009): Tropicana's redesign replaced the iconic orange and straw image with a glass of orange juice, significantly altering the logo. Consumers did not respond well to the new packaging, resulting in a 20% drop in sales within two months. Tropicana quickly reverted to the original design, highlighting the importance of understanding consumer attachment to brand elements.

  2. Gap (2010): Gap introduced a new logo that replaced its long-standing blue box with a minimalist design. The backlash from consumers and design critics was swift and severe, leading Gap to revert to its original logo within a week. This incident underscores the risks of drastic changes without thorough consumer research and engagement.

  3. Pepsi (2008): Pepsi's rebranding included a new logo and packaging design, which significantly altered the iconic globe symbol and typeface. The redesign was costly and failed to resonate with consumers, leading to confusion and criticism. While Pepsi did not revert to the old design, the update did not achieve the desired impact and required further adjustments.


Key Takeaways for Brand Updates

  1. Consumer Research: Understanding consumer preferences and attachment to current brand elements is crucial. Engaging with consumers through surveys, focus groups, and feedback can provide valuable insights. Tropicana and Gap's failures highlight the importance of this step.

  2. Gradual Evolution vs. Radical Change: Brands like Apple and Google succeeded by making thoughtful, evolutionary changes rather than radical overhauls. This approach can help maintain brand continuity while modernizing its appearance.

  3. Clear Communication: Effective communication about the reasons and vision behind a rebrand can help consumers understand and embrace the changes. Starbucks’ successful rebrand was partly due to clear messaging about its broader vision.

  4. Flexibility and Adaptability: Successful updates often involve designs that adapt well to various platforms and media, as seen with Google's logo update. Ensuring the new brand elements are versatile and scalable is essential in today's digital landscape.

  5. Internal and External Buy-In: Engaging both employees and consumers in the rebranding process can foster acceptance and enthusiasm. A rebrand should reflect the company's values and culture, which requires internal alignment and support.


Rebranding, while challenging, can rejuvenate a brand and align it more closely with its current mission and market. The key is to approach it thoughtfully, keeping consumers at the heart of the process and ensuring that the changes genuinely reflect the brand’s evolving identity.

Comentários


bottom of page