Watching From the Outside: Why Some Are Drawing Uncomfortable Parallels With America’s Direction

28 January 2026

Paul Francis

Want your article or story on our site? Contact us here

From the outside looking in, the United States feels tense in a way that is hard to ignore. Recent news has heightened that sense even further. On 24 January 2026, federal immigration agents fatally shot 37-year-old ICU nurse Alex Pretti during an operation in Minneapolis. Pretti was a lawful gun owner and had no significant criminal record, but video footage circulating online shows him recording officers with his phone and attempting to help a woman before being pepper-sprayed, wrestled to the ground and shot multiple times by agents. His death came amid a broader surge in immigration enforcement actions in the city that has sparked widespread protests and national debate about the use of force and accountability.

Police officers in black riot gear stand in formation on cobblestone street, holding batons, creating a tense and serious mood.

The killing of Pretti, who was widely remembered by colleagues and neighbours as compassionate and dedicated to his work, has drawn sharp criticism from civil rights groups, local officials and even former U.S. presidents. Public anger has spread beyond Minneapolis to rallies in other American cities and ongoing demands for transparency and reform.

For many people overseas, including in the UK, this adds a stark, human dimension to long-standing debates about immigration enforcement, executive power, and the use of force by federal agents.

Historical Echoes and Patterns of Enforcement

What unsettles observers most is not a superficial comparison to the worst chapters of history, but the processes that unfold when state power is exercised with increasing visibility and limited accountability. In the early 1930s in Germany, for example, enforcement and security agencies were expanded, rhetoric framed certain groups as threats to public order, and legal mechanisms were adapted gradually in the name of national security. Before the worst atrocities occurred, many citizens still believed institutions would hold firm.

The parallels some are drawing today are about how language, enforcement and public perception can shift over time, not about equating present-day events with the horrors of the Holocaust or claiming that history is bound to repeat itself. Democracies do not erode overnight. They do so when extraordinary measures become normalised and when fear is used as justification for expanding state authority.

Immigration Enforcement and Public Fear

The focus on agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the Border Patrol under the current administration has made enforcement part of everyday conversation in a way that was once reserved for national security crises. Actions such as raids, aggressive detentions, and high-profile shootings like the deaths of Pretti and Renee Good earlier this month have drawn comparisons to historical moments when internal policing exerted extraordinary authority over civilians.

From the outside, this visibility of enforcement is unsettling. In situations where armed federal agents are deployed in large numbers to American cities, and when deaths occur in contested circumstances, the tendency is for commentators and historians to look back at how other societies responded to similar shifts in state behaviour and to ask whether existing checks and balances are sufficient.

Rhetoric and the Framing of Threats

Language plays a powerful role in shaping public opinion and policy. In the early 20th century Europe, political leaders increasingly used rhetoric that framed certain groups as dangerous or incompatible with national identity. This language made previously unthinkable policies acceptable to a broad public.

In the U.S. context, political rhetoric around immigration has in some quarters suggested that foreign nationals or dissenters pose existential threats. Critics argue that such language sets the tone for enforcement actions that might otherwise be widely criticised.

The Legal System and Incremental Change

One of the most important lessons from modern history is that authoritarian systems often emerge through the reinterpretation or expansion of existing laws, rather than through the overt suspension of democratic systems. Courts, legislatures, and enforcement agencies remain in place in the United States, but when emergency powers or discretionary enforcement are normalised, the public’s trust in institutions can be eroded.

These concerns are not hypothetical. Critics have pointed out that the legal frameworks governing immigration enforcement give federal agencies enormous discretion. When enforcement is paired with aggressive tactics in civilian urban environments, it raises questions about oversight, accountability and the protection of civil liberties.

Why Observers Abroad Are Paying Attention

The United States has long been seen as a beacon of democratic values, a country where civil liberties and the rule of law are central to national identity. From the UK and Europe, watching developments in Minneapolis and across the U.S. feels significant precisely because it tests that assumption.

Modern communication accelerates polarisation and magnifies every incident. Historical memory informs how we interpret patterns. Europe’s twentieth-century experience serves as a backdrop that makes observers sensitive to early indicators of democratic erosion, such as expanded enforcement powers, heightened rhetoric about internal threats, and the normalisation of force against civilians.

It is not that the United States today mirrors Germany of the 1930s in outcome or intent. The difference lies in context, institutions and culture. What resonates is not the specific ideology, but the processes by which states can extend authority, restrict dissent, and normalise exceptional measures in the name of order.

A Cautionary Perspective

What worries many observers is not that a totalitarian system is inevitable. Democracies are resilient and multifaceted. The U.S. still has strong independent courts, vibrant civil society and free media. But history teaches that complacency is dangerous. Democracies do not disappear because people want tyranny. They erode when early warning signs are dismissed as exaggeration.

From Minneapolis to broader immigration enforcement debates, what is happening in the United States prompts reflection on how democratic societies balance security, liberty and accountability. From the outside, that balance feels more fragile than many expected.

And in a world where U.S. domestic policy often influences global norms, those questions matter far beyond America’s borders.

Current Most Read

Why the ‘Driverless’ Narrative Is Failing the Freight Industry

Two Reasons Why Businesses Are Losing Their Leads

Spectacular Beginnings: The Most Unforgettable Olympic Opening Ceremonies

Connor Banks
Aug 5, 2024
3 min read

The Olympics have a knack for kicking off with a bang with their Olympic Opening Ceremonies, blending culture, technology, and sheer spectacle. Here are some of the most unforgettable opening ceremonies that still have people talking.

Beijing 2008

The Beijing 2008 opening ceremony was a game-changer. Directed by Zhang Yimou, it was a stunning mix of precision, art, and cutting-edge tech. It all kicked off at the Bird’s Nest stadium with 2,008 drummers beating in perfect synchronisation, creating an electrifying start. Then came the giant LED scroll that unrolled on the stadium floor, showcasing China’s rich history and culture through jaw-dropping visuals and performances.

But the real showstopper was gymnast Li Ning’s grand finale. Lifted into the air, he seemed to run along the rim of the stadium before lighting the Olympic cauldron. This moment, blending athleticism and high-tech wizardry perfectly symbolised China’s mix of ancient traditions and modern advancements. It was a spectacle that set a new bar for Olympic ceremonies.

London 2012

London 2012’s opening ceremony, crafted by Danny Boyle, was a joyous, cheeky celebration of British culture and history. It began with a whimsical take on the Industrial Revolution, complete with rising smokestacks and bustling factory scenes. Then came a brilliant surprise: a segment featuring James Bond (Daniel Craig) escorting Queen Elizabeth II to the stadium, culminating in a stunt double of the Queen parachuting in.

A heartfelt tribute to the National Health Service (NHS) saw kids in hospital beds and nurses dancing, celebrating the UK’s dedication to healthcare. The ceremony's emotional peak was the lighting of the cauldron by seven young athletes, chosen by British Olympic legends, representing the future of sports in the UK. This blend of humour, history, and heartfelt moments made it a standout.

Sydney 2000

Sydney 2000’s opening ceremony was a vibrant showcase of Australia’s culture and natural beauty. Directed by Ric Birch and David Atkins, it featured 12,000 performers, including a powerful segment dedicated to Aboriginal culture with traditional dances and music. This focus on indigenous heritage highlighted Australia’s efforts towards reconciliation.

The unforgettable moment came when Cathy Freeman, an Indigenous Australian and star sprinter, lit the Olympic cauldron. She ran through a waterfall before igniting the flame, symbolising the unity of fire and water and reflecting Australia’s connection to nature. The whole event was a poignant display of inclusivity and national pride.

Barcelona 1992

Barcelona 1992’s opening ceremony, directed by Pepo Sol, blended local Catalonian culture with Spain’s artistic legacy. It opened with traditional music and dances celebrating the host city’s heritage. The ceremony also paid tribute to famous Spanish artists like Salvador Dalí and Pablo Picasso through colourful and imaginative performances.

The highlight was the dramatic cauldron lighting by Paralympic archer Antonio Rebollo, who shot a flaming arrow across the stadium to ignite the flame. This unique and artistic approach remains one of the most iconic moments in Olympic history.

Los Angeles 1984

The Los Angeles 1984 opening ceremony, directed by David L. Wolper, set a new bar for entertainment and mass participation. It featured a massive card stunt with 84,000 spectators and even included a performer flying across the stadium with a jetpack, adding a futuristic flair. The ceremony reached its emotional peak when Rafer Johnson, a former decathlon champion, climbed a long staircase to light the cauldron, symbolising human triumph.

This event was all about big, bold entertainment and audience involvement, reflecting Hollywood’s influence and making it a memorable show.

Tokyo 1964

Tokyo 1964 marked Japan’s post-war resurgence and its emergence as a global power. The opening ceremony emphasised peace and unity, with a well-organised parade of athletes. The cauldron was lit by Yoshinori Sakai, born in Hiroshima on the day the atomic bomb was dropped, a poignant symbol of peace and resilience. This ceremony highlighted Japan’s transformation and hope for a peaceful future.

Athens 2004

The Athens 2004 ceremony, directed by Dimitris Papaioannou, celebrated Greece’s ancient history and its role as the birthplace of the Olympics. A central pool symbolising the Aegean Sea was a key element, with performers reenacting Greek myths and historical events. Olympic windsurfing champion Nikolaos Kaklamanakis lit the cauldron in a dramatic moment, evoking the spirit of the ancient Games. This blend of ancient and modern elements created a nostalgic and powerful atmosphere.

Atlanta 1996

The Atlanta 1996 opening ceremony was a heartfelt celebration of American culture and history, featuring performances by legends like Gladys Knight, Stevie Wonder, and BB King. The emotional high point was Muhammad Ali, despite his battle with Parkinson’s disease, lighting the cauldron. This powerful image of Ali, symbolising courage and perseverance, left an indelible mark on viewers. The event also celebrated the rich musical heritage of the American South, making it both entertaining and deeply moving.

These ceremonies stand out not just for their visual grandeur but for the stories they told and the emotions they evoked, each capturing the spirit of their host cities and nations in unforgettable ways