A World Cup Under Pressure: How American Politics Could Shape FIFA 2026

20 January 2026

Paul Francis

Want your article or story on our site? Contact us here

The FIFA World Cup is meant to be football’s great unifier. Every four years, politics is supposed to fade into the background as supporters cross borders to follow their teams. Yet as the 2026 tournament approaches, concerns are growing that the political climate in the United States may be doing the opposite.

Soccer ball with US flag design on grass field in stadium. Blurred crowd and scoreboard in background. Bright, sunny atmosphere.

Recent comments and policy signals from President Donald Trump have reignited anxieties among fans, organisers and civil rights groups. While football itself remains as popular as ever, the environment surrounding the tournament is becoming increasingly complicated, raising questions about travel, ticket sales and whether the world’s biggest sporting event can truly remain separate from domestic politics.

Politics enters the picture again

Donald Trump’s return to the centre of American politics has brought renewed focus on immigration, border enforcement and national security. His language around immigration has hardened, and his administration has signalled a tougher stance on visas and border controls. For many international football supporters, particularly those travelling from Europe, Africa and South America, this has raised uncomfortable questions.

Online, concerns have circulated about the visibility of immigration enforcement agencies and the risk of being caught up in aggressive border or visa checks. While some of these fears are undoubtedly amplified by social media, they are not appearing in a vacuum. Advocacy groups have formally raised concerns with FIFA about whether fans from certain regions will face additional scrutiny or barriers when travelling to the United States.

For some supporters, the idea of spending thousands of pounds on tickets and travel only to face uncertainty at the border is enough to pause or reconsider plans. It is here that the politics of Captain Orange begin to intersect directly with football.

Are ticket sales really struggling?

The picture around ticket sales is mixed and often misunderstood. FIFA has reported extremely strong global demand across several ticket application phases, with millions of requests submitted worldwide. On paper, this suggests the tournament is not in danger of empty stadiums.

However, critics point to a different issue. While demand exists, actual purchases appear uneven, especially at the higher price points. There have been persistent reports of slower sales for certain matches and categories, particularly among travelling supporters who are weighing cost against political and logistical risk.

In other words, the concern is not a lack of interest in football. It is hesitation. Fans are watching, waiting and calculating whether the experience will justify the expense and uncertainty.

The cost of attending the World Cup

Price is one of the most significant factors shaping that calculation. The 2026 World Cup is shaping up to be one of the most expensive in history.

The cheapest group stage tickets have been priced at around sixty dollars, but these are limited and often difficult to secure. More realistic prices for popular group matches run into the hundreds, with premium seats climbing well above two thousand dollars.

Knockout rounds are another level entirely. Quarter final and semi final tickets can cost several thousand dollars, while premium seats for the final in New Jersey have been listed at over six thousand dollars at face value. On secondary markets, prices can climb even higher.

For many fans, particularly from Europe and South America, these figures sit alongside the cost of long haul flights, accommodation and internal travel across a vast host country. The result is a World Cup that feels financially distant from the traditional supporter.

Travel, visas and fear of uncertainty

Beyond cost, travel logistics are adding another layer of anxiety. The United States is hosting the majority of matches across a geographically enormous area. Fans may need to fly thousands of miles between cities, navigate unfamiliar transport systems and deal with complex visa requirements.

Recent tightening of visa rules and public rhetoric around immigration enforcement have not helped perceptions. Reports of fans from African nations struggling with visa delays or rejections have circulated widely, even if they do not represent the majority experience.

The problem is not necessarily policy itself, but uncertainty. When supporters feel unclear about how they will be treated on arrival, or whether rules may change suddenly, confidence erodes.

Other pressures on the tournament

The political environment is only one of several pressures facing the 2026 World Cup. Stadium readiness, security planning, climate concerns and the sheer scale of the expanded tournament all present challenges.

The United States is not a traditional football nation in the way Europe or South America is. While interest has grown rapidly, there are still questions about atmosphere, cultural familiarity and whether the event will feel like a World Cup rather than a series of high end entertainment events.

There is also a growing debate about whether FIFA’s commercial strategy is distancing the tournament from its roots. High prices, premium experiences and corporate packages may deliver revenue, but they risk sidelining the fans who give the World Cup its character.

A tournament caught between sport and state

None of this means the 2026 World Cup is doomed. Far from it. The global appetite for football remains immense, and millions will watch and attend regardless of political context. But it does suggest that the tournament is unusually exposed to forces beyond the pitch.

When the host nation’s political leadership becomes a source of anxiety rather than reassurance, it inevitably shapes perception. When attending feels like a financial gamble layered with political risk, some supporters will hesitate.

The World Cup has always existed within the world it inhabits. In 2026, that world includes heightened political tension, polarised leadership and rising costs. Whether football can rise above those pressures, or whether they will leave a lasting mark on the tournament, remains one of the most important unanswered questions heading into kick off.

Current Most Read

Reeves’ pubs U-turn: how business rates sparked a revolt, and why ministers are now under fire

When AI Crosses the Line: Why the Grok Controversy Has Triggered a Regulatory Reckoning

The Growing Threat of Infectious Diseases in the UK: A Public Health Crisis

Paul Francis
Apr 2, 2025
4 min read

The United Kingdom is currently facing an alarming rise in infectious diseases, placing immense pressure on the National Health Service (NHS) and posing a significant risk to public health. A surge in vaccine-preventable diseases, including measles, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), influenza, whooping cough, and tuberculosis (TB), has contributed to an increasing burden on healthcare services. This situation underscores the urgent need for enhanced public health measures, improved vaccination coverage, and strategic planning to mitigate the crisis.

Close-up of a virus with a red nucleus and blue-green spikes against a blurred background, highlighting fine textures and vivid colors.

The Resurgence of Vaccine-Preventable Diseases

Historically, vaccines have been instrumental in reducing the prevalence of infectious diseases. However, in recent years, vaccination rates in the UK have declined, leading to a resurgence of previously controlled illnesses.

Measles: The UK lost its measles-free status in 2019 due to a drop in vaccination rates, and cases have continued to rise. Measles is highly contagious and can lead to severe complications such as pneumonia, encephalitis, and, in extreme cases, death. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends a 95% vaccination rate to achieve herd immunity, but in some areas of the UK, coverage has fallen below 90%.

Whooping Cough (Pertussis): Cases of whooping cough have also increased, particularly among infants who are too young to receive their full series of vaccinations. This bacterial infection causes severe coughing fits and can be fatal in newborns. The decline in maternal vaccination rates has contributed to the rise in cases.

Tuberculosis (TB): Once considered a disease of the past, TB remains a persistent threat in the UK. With increasing numbers of antibiotic-resistant TB cases, controlling its spread has become more challenging. TB disproportionately affects disadvantaged communities, including the homeless and migrants from high-prevalence countries.

The Impact on the NHS

The rise in infectious diseases is straining NHS resources. Infectious diseases now account for approximately 20% of all hospital admissions, significantly impacting the ability of hospitals to provide care for other conditions. The financial burden is also substantial, with the NHS spending an estimated £6 billion annually on treating these illnesses.

Bed Occupancy: The growing number of hospitalizations due to infectious diseases has led to higher bed occupancy rates, limiting the availability of hospital beds for elective procedures and emergency care.

Staff Shortages: The increased demand for healthcare services has exacerbated existing staff shortages within the NHS, leading to burnout among frontline workers.

Delays in Treatment: As hospitals struggle to accommodate infectious disease patients, delays in treatment for other serious conditions, including cancer and cardiovascular diseases, have become more common.

Factors Contributing to the Crisis

Several factors have contributed to the resurgence of infectious diseases in the UK:

Declining Vaccination Rates: Public scepticism, fueled by misinformation on social media, has led to a decrease in vaccine uptake. A lack of awareness campaigns and difficulties in accessing vaccination services have further compounded the problem.
Global Travel and Migration: Increased international travel has facilitated the spread of infectious diseases. Additionally, migrant populations from high-risk regions may not have been vaccinated against certain diseases, leading to local outbreaks.
Antibiotic Resistance: The rise of drug-resistant bacterial infections, including TB, poses a significant challenge. Overprescription and misuse of antibiotics have accelerated resistance, making once-treatable infections more difficult to manage.
Socioeconomic Inequalities: Deprivation and poor living conditions increase vulnerability to infectious diseases. Limited access to healthcare, crowded housing, and poor nutrition contribute to higher infection rates in disadvantaged communities.

Government and Public Health Response

In response to the crisis, public health officials and the UK government have implemented several measures:

Vaccine Promotion Campaigns: Efforts are underway to increase public confidence in vaccines through awareness campaigns and targeted outreach programs. The NHS has been working to improve access to vaccinations by expanding clinic hours and offering mobile vaccination units in underserved areas.
Enhanced Surveillance and Early Detection: Public Health England (PHE) has ramped up monitoring efforts to detect outbreaks early and implement containment strategies.
Infection Control Measures: Hospitals and care facilities have strengthened infection prevention protocols to reduce the spread of infectious diseases. This includes improved hand hygiene practices, isolation measures for infected patients, and enhanced ventilation in healthcare settings.
Antibiotic Stewardship Programs: To combat antibiotic resistance, healthcare providers are being trained to prescribe antibiotics more judiciously. Public awareness campaigns on the dangers of antibiotic misuse have also been launched.

The Road Ahead: Long-Term Solutions

Addressing the rise in infectious diseases requires a multi-faceted approach:

Strengthening Immunization Programs: The government must ensure vaccines are easily accessible and that misinformation is actively countered with clear, science-based communication. Expanding school-based vaccination programs could also help boost coverage rates.
Investment in Healthcare Infrastructure: Increasing NHS capacity by investing in new hospitals, expanding bed availability, and hiring more healthcare professionals is crucial for managing future outbreaks.
Research and Development: Continued investment in research to develop new vaccines, treatments, and diagnostic tools is essential to combat emerging infectious threats.
Addressing Socioeconomic Determinants: Efforts must be made to reduce health inequalities by improving housing conditions, providing better access to healthcare for vulnerable populations, and ensuring that public health initiatives reach all communities effectively.

The resurgence of infectious diseases in the UK presents a serious challenge to public health and the NHS. While efforts are being made to curb the spread of these illnesses, a more comprehensive and sustained approach is required. Improving vaccination rates, investing in healthcare infrastructure, addressing antibiotic resistance, and tackling socioeconomic inequalities will be key to mitigating the impact of infectious diseases in the long term. Failure to act decisively now could lead to even greater healthcare crises in the future.