top of page
A World Cup Under Pressure: How American Politics Could Shape FIFA 2026

A World Cup Under Pressure: How American Politics Could Shape FIFA 2026

20 January 2026

Paul Francis

Want your article or story on our site? Contact us here

The FIFA World Cup is meant to be football’s great unifier. Every four years, politics is supposed to fade into the background as supporters cross borders to follow their teams. Yet as the 2026 tournament approaches, concerns are growing that the political climate in the United States may be doing the opposite.


Soccer ball with US flag design on grass field in stadium. Blurred crowd and scoreboard in background. Bright, sunny atmosphere.

Recent comments and policy signals from President Donald Trump have reignited anxieties among fans, organisers and civil rights groups. While football itself remains as popular as ever, the environment surrounding the tournament is becoming increasingly complicated, raising questions about travel, ticket sales and whether the world’s biggest sporting event can truly remain separate from domestic politics.


Politics enters the picture again

Donald Trump’s return to the centre of American politics has brought renewed focus on immigration, border enforcement and national security. His language around immigration has hardened, and his administration has signalled a tougher stance on visas and border controls. For many international football supporters, particularly those travelling from Europe, Africa and South America, this has raised uncomfortable questions.


Online, concerns have circulated about the visibility of immigration enforcement agencies and the risk of being caught up in aggressive border or visa checks. While some of these fears are undoubtedly amplified by social media, they are not appearing in a vacuum. Advocacy groups have formally raised concerns with FIFA about whether fans from certain regions will face additional scrutiny or barriers when travelling to the United States.


For some supporters, the idea of spending thousands of pounds on tickets and travel only to face uncertainty at the border is enough to pause or reconsider plans. It is here that the politics of Captain Orange begin to intersect directly with football.


Are ticket sales really struggling?

The picture around ticket sales is mixed and often misunderstood. FIFA has reported extremely strong global demand across several ticket application phases, with millions of requests submitted worldwide. On paper, this suggests the tournament is not in danger of empty stadiums.


However, critics point to a different issue. While demand exists, actual purchases appear uneven, especially at the higher price points. There have been persistent reports of slower sales for certain matches and categories, particularly among travelling supporters who are weighing cost against political and logistical risk.


In other words, the concern is not a lack of interest in football. It is hesitation. Fans are watching, waiting and calculating whether the experience will justify the expense and uncertainty.


The cost of attending the World Cup

Price is one of the most significant factors shaping that calculation. The 2026 World Cup is shaping up to be one of the most expensive in history.


The cheapest group stage tickets have been priced at around sixty dollars, but these are limited and often difficult to secure. More realistic prices for popular group matches run into the hundreds, with premium seats climbing well above two thousand dollars.


Knockout rounds are another level entirely. Quarter final and semi final tickets can cost several thousand dollars, while premium seats for the final in New Jersey have been listed at over six thousand dollars at face value. On secondary markets, prices can climb even higher.


For many fans, particularly from Europe and South America, these figures sit alongside the cost of long haul flights, accommodation and internal travel across a vast host country. The result is a World Cup that feels financially distant from the traditional supporter.


Travel, visas and fear of uncertainty

Beyond cost, travel logistics are adding another layer of anxiety. The United States is hosting the majority of matches across a geographically enormous area. Fans may need to fly thousands of miles between cities, navigate unfamiliar transport systems and deal with complex visa requirements.


Recent tightening of visa rules and public rhetoric around immigration enforcement have not helped perceptions. Reports of fans from African nations struggling with visa delays or rejections have circulated widely, even if they do not represent the majority experience.


The problem is not necessarily policy itself, but uncertainty. When supporters feel unclear about how they will be treated on arrival, or whether rules may change suddenly, confidence erodes.


Other pressures on the tournament

The political environment is only one of several pressures facing the 2026 World Cup. Stadium readiness, security planning, climate concerns and the sheer scale of the expanded tournament all present challenges.


The United States is not a traditional football nation in the way Europe or South America is. While interest has grown rapidly, there are still questions about atmosphere, cultural familiarity and whether the event will feel like a World Cup rather than a series of high end entertainment events.


There is also a growing debate about whether FIFA’s commercial strategy is distancing the tournament from its roots. High prices, premium experiences and corporate packages may deliver revenue, but they risk sidelining the fans who give the World Cup its character.


A tournament caught between sport and state

None of this means the 2026 World Cup is doomed. Far from it. The global appetite for football remains immense, and millions will watch and attend regardless of political context. But it does suggest that the tournament is unusually exposed to forces beyond the pitch.


When the host nation’s political leadership becomes a source of anxiety rather than reassurance, it inevitably shapes perception. When attending feels like a financial gamble layered with political risk, some supporters will hesitate.


The World Cup has always existed within the world it inhabits. In 2026, that world includes heightened political tension, polarised leadership and rising costs. Whether football can rise above those pressures, or whether they will leave a lasting mark on the tournament, remains one of the most important unanswered questions heading into kick off.

Current Most Read

A World Cup Under Pressure: How American Politics Could Shape FIFA 2026
Reeves’ pubs U-turn: how business rates sparked a revolt, and why ministers are now under fire
When AI Crosses the Line: Why the Grok Controversy Has Triggered a Regulatory Reckoning

Conflict Beneath the Surface: How Central Africa’s Mineral Wealth Fuels Instability

  • Writer: Paul Francis
    Paul Francis
  • Jun 3, 2025
  • 2 min read

In the heart of Central Africa, the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) is a land of paradoxes. Beneath its lush landscapes lie vast reserves of minerals - cobalt, coltan, gold, and tin - that are essential to the global technology and renewable energy industries. Yet, this abundance has not translated into prosperity for its people. Instead, the competition for control over these resources has perpetuated cycles of violence, displacement, and economic exploitation.


Aerial view of vibrant open-pit mine with yellow machinery working on colorful, striated rock layers in a rugged terrain.

The Resource Curse: Wealth That Breeds Conflict

The DRC's mineral riches have long been both a blessing and a curse. While they hold the promise of economic development, they have also attracted a myriad of armed groups vying for control. The M23 rebel group, allegedly supported by Rwanda, has seized key mining areas, including the Rubaya coltan mines, which are estimated to produce 15% of the world's coltan - a mineral critical for electronic devices. Control over such resources provides these groups with substantial revenue streams, enabling them to fund their operations and entrench their power. HORN REVIEW+2Global Initiative+2The Africa Report+2


Regional Dynamics: Rwanda's Involvement

Rwanda's role in the DRC's mineral conflicts is a subject of intense scrutiny. While Kigali denies direct involvement, reports suggest that Rwandan forces have supported M23 rebels in their campaigns. The minerals extracted from rebel-held territories are often smuggled across the border into Rwanda, where they enter global supply chains. This illicit trade not only undermines the DRC's sovereignty but also implicates international markets in the perpetuation of conflict. 


Global Implications: The Demand for Conflict Minerals

The global demand for minerals like coltan and cobalt has surged with the proliferation of smartphones, electric vehicles, and renewable energy technologies. This demand has inadvertently fueled conflicts in mineral-rich regions like the DRC. Despite international efforts to establish conflict-free supply chains, enforcement remains challenging. Major corporations have faced criticism for sourcing minerals linked to human rights abuses and environmental degradation. Financial Times


Human Cost: Communities Caught in the Crossfire

The human toll of the mineral-fueled conflicts is staggering. Millions have been displaced, and countless lives have been lost. In areas under rebel control, civilians often face extortion, forced labor, and violence. Artisanal miners, including children, work in hazardous conditions for meager wages, extracting minerals that fuel the global economy. The lack of infrastructure and basic services further exacerbates the suffering of these communities. AP News


International Responses: Seeking Sustainable Solutions

Efforts to address the DRC's mineral conflicts have included international sanctions, peacekeeping missions, and initiatives to promote transparency in mineral sourcing. Recently, the United States has been involved in negotiations with the DRC to secure access to critical minerals in exchange for infrastructure investments and support in resolving conflicts. However, such agreements must be approached with caution to ensure they do not perpetuate existing power imbalances or overlook the needs of local communities. 


Conclusion: Breaking the Cycle

The DRC's mineral wealth has the potential to drive economic growth and development. However, without comprehensive reforms that address governance, corruption, and the rule of law, the cycle of conflict is likely to continue. International stakeholders must prioritize ethical sourcing, support capacity-building initiatives, and engage with local communities to ensure that the benefits of mineral wealth are equitably distributed. Only through such concerted efforts can the DRC transform its mineral riches from a source of conflict into a foundation for peace and prosperity.

bottom of page