top of page
Artemis II Returns From the Moon as Old Conspiracies Find New Life Online

Artemis II Returns From the Moon as Old Conspiracies Find New Life Online

9 April 2026

Paul Francis

Want your article or story on our site? Contact us here

A Mission in Motion, Not Preparation


Artemis II is no longer a promise or a plan. It is a live, unfolding mission.


Having successfully travelled beyond low Earth orbit and looped around the Moon, the crew are now on their return journey to Earth. In doing so, they have already secured their place in history as the first humans in more than half a century to venture into deep space. The mission itself has been widely followed, not just through official NASA channels but across social media, where images, clips and astronaut updates have circulated in near real time.


Among the most striking moments so far have been the views of Earth from lunar distance. These are not abstract renderings or archival references. They are current, high-resolution visuals captured by a crew physically present in deep space. For many, it has been a powerful reminder of both scale and perspective, reinforcing the reality of human spaceflight beyond Earth orbit.


Yet as these images spread, something else has travelled with them.


Earthrise over the Moon's horizon, showing Earth partially lit against the blackness of space. The Moon's surface is grey and textured.

The Return of a Familiar Narrative

Alongside the excitement and global attention, Flat Earth narratives have begun to reappear with renewed visibility. As with previous milestones in space exploration, the mission has acted as a catalyst rather than a cause.


Footage from Artemis II, particularly anything showing Earth as a curved, distant sphere, has been picked apart across various platforms. Claims of digital manipulation, lens distortion and staged environments have resurfaced, often attached to short clips or isolated frames removed from their original context.


This is not evidence of a growing movement in terms of numbers. It is, however, a clear increase in visibility. The scale of Artemis II has pulled these conversations back into mainstream timelines, where they sit alongside genuine public interest and scientific engagement.


Real-Time Content, Real-Time Reaction

What distinguishes Artemis II from earlier missions is the immediacy of its coverage. This is not a mission filtered through delayed broadcasts or carefully edited highlights. It is being experienced as it happens.


That immediacy has a double edge. On one hand, it allows for unprecedented access and transparency. On the other, it provides a constant stream of material that can be reinterpreted, clipped and redistributed without context.


A reflection in a window, a momentary visual artefact in a video feed, or even the way lighting behaves inside the spacecraft can quickly be reframed as suspicious. Once those clips are detached from their technical explanations, they take on a life of their own within certain online communities.


The speed at which this happens is key. Reaction no longer follows the event. It unfolds alongside it.


Scepticism in the Age of Algorithms

Flat Earth content does not exist in isolation. It is sustained by a broader culture of scepticism towards institutions, particularly those associated with government and large-scale scientific endeavour.


NASA, as both a symbol of authority and a source of complex, hard-to-verify information, naturally becomes a focal point. Artemis II, with its deep space trajectory and high visibility, fits neatly into that framework.


Social media platforms then amplify the effect. Content that challenges, contradicts or provokes tends to perform well, regardless of its factual basis. As a result, posts questioning the mission often gain traction not because they are persuasive, but because they are engaging.


This creates a distorted sense of scale. What is, in reality, a fringe viewpoint can appear far more prominent than it actually is.


The Broader Public Perspective

Outside of these pockets of scepticism, the response to Artemis II has been largely one of fascination and admiration. The mission has reignited interest in human spaceflight, particularly among audiences who have never experienced a live crewed journey beyond Earth orbit.


There is also a noticeable difference in tone compared to previous eras. The Apollo missions were moments of collective attention, where a single narrative dominated public consciousness. Artemis II exists in a far more fragmented environment, where multiple conversations unfold simultaneously.


In that landscape, it is entirely possible for celebration, curiosity and conspiracy to coexist without directly intersecting.


A Reflection of the Modern Media Landscape

The re-emergence of Flat Earth narratives during Artemis II is not an anomaly. It is part of a broader pattern that defines how major events are now experienced.


Every significant moment generates its own parallel discourse. One is grounded in reality, driven by science, engineering and exploration. The other is shaped by interpretation, scepticism and the mechanics of online engagement.


Artemis II, currently making its way back to Earth, sits at the centre of both.

The mission itself is a clear demonstration of human capability and technological progress. The conversation around it, however, reveals something different. It highlights how information is processed, challenged and reshaped in real time.


In that sense, Artemis II is not just a journey through space. It is a case study in how modern audiences navigate truth, trust and visibility in an increasingly complex digital world.

Current Most Read

Artemis II Returns From the Moon as Old Conspiracies Find New Life Online
Streamlining Small Business Operations for Maximum Efficiency
Posts Are Down, But Scrolling Isn’t: Are We Watching More and Sharing Less on Social Media?

Karrion Kross Released from WWE: What Happened and What Comes Next

  • Writer: Paul Francis
    Paul Francis
  • Aug 14, 2025
  • 3 min read

Karrion Kross, known to wrestling fans around the world for his intense in-ring style and commanding presence, has once again parted ways with WWE. The news broke earlier this week, sparking a wave of reaction from fans and fellow wrestlers alike.


From the Indies to the Big Stage


Karrion Kross with long hair in a studded leather jacket stands confidently. The jacket features chains and graffiti art. Background is dimly lit.
Photo by Diego Serrano

Before signing with WWE, Kross built a reputation on the independent circuit under the name Killer Kross. His career began in the mid-2010s with appearances in promotions like Global Force Wrestling, Lucha Underground, and AAA in Mexico. With his imposing stature, MMA-influenced offence, and calculated promos, Kross quickly became a standout. His run in Impact Wrestling, alongside real-life partner Scarlett Bordeaux, cemented him as one of the hottest free agents in the business.


Arrival in WWE

Kross joined WWE’s NXT brand in early 2020, debuting with cinematic vignettes and instantly making an impact. Accompanied by Scarlett, his entrance became one of the most talked-about in the company. Within months, he captured the NXT Championship, defeating Keith Lee in dominant fashion.


However, an injury forced him to relinquish the title shortly after. Upon his return, he reclaimed the championship before eventually dropping it to Samoa Joe in 2021.


Why No "Killer Kross"?

When Kross signed with WWE, the company opted to change his name to “Karrion Kross.” The reasoning was twofold:

  • WWE prefers to trademark its talent’s ring names for exclusive branding and merchandising purposes. “Killer Kross” was already established in the independents and not owned by WWE.

  • The company wanted to present Kross with a new, unique identity that fit their vision for his character. The “Karrion” spelling played into the darker, foreboding aesthetic WWE was crafting for him.

While some fans embraced the new name, others never warmed to it, feeling it lost some of the grit of his indie persona.


Main Roster Struggles

Kross’s move to WWE’s main roster in mid-2021 proved controversial. Stripped of his NXT presentation and Scarlett’s accompaniment, he debuted wearing a gladiator-style mask and gear that fans felt clashed with his established image.


Creative changes, questionable booking decisions, and a lack of momentum eventually led to his first WWE release in November 2021.


Karrion Kross's Second Run and Sudden Exit

In 2022, under the leadership of Triple H, Kross returned to WWE with Scarlett by his side. Hopes were high for a rejuvenated push, and while he was featured in feuds with Drew McIntyre and Rey Mysterio, his on-screen appearances became sporadic in 2023 and 2024.

Earlier this week, WWE announced his release once again. The move has raised eyebrows among fans, with some speculating it could be a “work” designed to set up a storyline surprise down the line.


Fan Response

Reactions have been split. Many fans have voiced frustration, calling it a waste of talent and a missed opportunity for WWE to create a top-tier villain. Others argue that Kross’s WWE run never fully clicked with audiences outside of NXT.


One thing is clear: his release has reignited debate about WWE’s creative direction and its handling of unique talent.



Kross has already posted a video message to fans on his official YouTube channel, addressing the release and teasing what might come next.


What’s Next for Karrion Kross?

If his past career moves are any indication, Kross will not be short on opportunities. A return to the independent circuit, or even a move to AEW, Impact Wrestling, or New Japan Pro Wrestling, would allow him to reconnect with fans who appreciated his original “Killer Kross” persona.


Should this turn out to be a WWE storyline twist, it could lead to one of the more memorable comebacks in recent years. Either way, the wrestling world will be watching closely to see where he lands next.

bottom of page