Reeves’ pubs U-turn: how business rates sparked a revolt, and why ministers are now under fire

15 January 2026

Paul Francis

Want your article or story on our site? Contact us here

Rachel Reeves is preparing a U-turn on business rates for pubs after an unusually public backlash from landlords, trade bodies, and even some Labour MPs. In recent days, pubs across the country have reportedly refused service to, or outright barred, Labour MPs in protest, turning a technical tax change into a political flashpoint about competence, consultation, and whether the government understood its own numbers.

Two pints of frothy beer on a wooden ledge, reflecting on a window. Warm, dim lighting creates a cozy atmosphere.

The row centres on business rates, the property-based tax paid on most non-domestic premises. For pubs, it is often one of the highest fixed costs after staffing and energy. And while the government has argued its reforms were meant to make the system fairer for high street businesses, many publicans say the real world impact is the opposite: higher bills arriving at the same time as wage costs and other overheads are already rising.

What changed and why pubs reacted so fiercely

The immediate trigger was the November Budget package, which set out changes tied to the 2026 business rates revaluation and the planned move away from pandemic era relief. As the details landed, hospitality groups warned that many pubs would be hit by sharp rises because their rateable values, the Valuation Office Agency’s estimate of a property’s annual rental value, had increased significantly at revaluation.

A Reuters report published on 8 January 2026 described the government preparing measures to “soften the impact” of the planned hike after industry warnings that closures would follow. It also noted trade body concerns about elevated rateable values and warned that thousands of smaller pubs could face a bill for the first time.

The anger quickly became visible. ITV News reported on pub owners in Dorset who began banning Labour MPs after the Budget, with the campaign spreading as other pubs joined in. LabourList also reported that more than 1,000 pubs had banned Labour MPs from their premises in protest. Sky News similarly reported that pubs had been banning Labour MPs over the rises due to begin in April.

How business rates are actually calculated, with pub-friendly examples

Business rates can sound opaque, but the calculation is straightforward in principle:

Business rates bill = Rateable value x Multiplier, minus any reliefs

Where it became combustible for pubs is that multiple moving parts changed at once: revaluation shifted rateable values, multipliers were adjusted for different sectors, and pandemic era relief was being reduced or removed.

The government’s own Budget factsheet includes worked examples that show why bills can jump even when headline multipliers look lower.

Example 1: a pub whose rateable value rises modestly: In 2025/26, a pub with a £30,000 rateable value used a multiplier of 49.9p and then deducted 40% retail, hospitality and leisure relief. The factsheet sets out the steps: £30,000 x 0.499 = £14,970, then 40% relief reduces that to a final bill of £8,982. After revaluation, the rateable value rises to £39,000. The pub qualifies for a lower small business multiplier of 38.2p, so before reliefs: £39,000 x 0.382 = £14,898. Transitional support caps the increase, resulting in a final bill of £10,329.

Even here, the bill rises. The cap stops it from rising as sharply as it otherwise would, but it still climbs.

Example 2: a pub whose rateable value more than doubles: In the most politically explosive scenario, the factsheet describes a pub whose rateable value rises from £50,000 to £110,000 at revaluation. In 2025/26, the bill is calculated as £50,000 x 0.499 = £24,950, then reduced by 40% relief to £14,970. In 2026/27, before any relief, the bill would be £110,000 x 0.43 = £47,300. Transitional support then caps the increase, producing a final bill of £19,461.

That is still a meaningful jump in a single year, even with protections. For pubs operating on thin margins, that scale of increase can mean the difference between staying open and closing.

This is why so many publicans argue that the political messaging did not match the lived reality. They were told reforms would support the high street, then saw calculations that delivered higher costs.

What Reeves is now doing to correct it

The government has not published the full final package yet, but multiple reports describe a targeted climbdown.

Reuters reported that a support package would be outlined in the coming days and that it would include measures addressing business rates, alongside licensing and deregulation. LabourList reported that Treasury officials were expected to reduce the percentage of a pub’s rateable value used to calculate business rates and introduce a transitional relief fund. The Independent reported ministers briefing that Reeves was expected to extend some form of relief rather than scrap support entirely from April, after pressure from Labour MPs and the sector.

In practical terms, “softening” the rise can be done in a few ways:

Increasing or extending pub-specific relief so bills do not jump as sharply in April 2026
Adjusting the multiplier applied to pubs within the retail, hospitality and leisure category
Strengthening transitional relief so the cap on year to year increases is tighter
Supplementary measures like licensing changes, to reduce other cost pressures

The direction of travel is clear: the Treasury is trying to stop the revaluation shock from landing all at once on pubs.

The critics’ argument: ministers did not do their homework

The most damaging strand of this story is not the U turn itself, but the allegation that ministers did not understand the impact at the point of announcement.

Sky News has reported internal disquiet about the business rates increase, reflecting wider unease about the political cost of the policy. ITV has also reported pub owners arguing that the “devil is in the detail,” a polite way of saying the announcement did not match the numbers that followed.

Most seriously, reporting summarised from The Times states that Business Secretary Peter Kyle acknowledged ministers did not have key details about the revaluation’s effects on hospitality at the time of the November Budget, and that the property specific revaluations created an unexpected burden for some pubs.

That admission fuels the criticism that this was not simply a policy misfire, but a failure of preparation. The core accusation from critics is straightforward: if the government is reshaping a tax system built on property values, then the people in charge should have had a clear grasp of what the valuation changes would do to real businesses. If they did not, they were not doing the job properly.

Even if ministers argue the valuation process is independent, the political reality is that pubs heard one message, then saw another outcome. The result has been a crisis of trust that a late rescue package may soften, but not erase.

What this episode tells us about tax policy and trust

Pubs are not just businesses. They are community anchors and cultural institutions, which is why this backlash travelled so quickly from accountancy jargon to front-page politics.

Reeves’ U turn may yet prevent the worst outcomes for some pubs. But the episode has exposed a deeper vulnerability: when the government announces complex reforms without convincing evidence, it understands the knock on effects, and the backlash is not only economic. It becomes personal, symbolic, and politically contagious.

If the Treasury wants to draw a line under this, it will need to do more than patch the numbers. It will need to convince the public and the businesses affected that decisions are being made with full visibility of the consequences, not discovered after the revolt begins.

Current Most Read

When AI Crosses the Line: Why the Grok Controversy Has Triggered a Regulatory Reckoning

A World on Edge: Why Global Tensions Are Rising and What History Can Tell Us

The Renaissance of Professional Wrestling

Connor Banks
Apr 15, 2024
4 min read

With a combined attendance of 145,298 fans and over 660 million people watching over both nights, Wrestlemania XL showed that wrestling can be mainstream again and be successful at it by making it the most successful show in company history. Following a streak of sold-out weekly shows, WWE has shown that its renaissance in popularity seen over the last few months was not a “fluke” but instead a growing trend towards growth.

Let me start with the elephant in the room that people always need to talk about, yes wrestling is “fake” and the people who watch every week know it is. It’s the same as any other scripted media like films and theatre except in the world of Professional Wrestling the bad guy often wins, in fact, they usually win. This is what makes it more unpredictable and much more fun for people who can suspend that disbelief.

But like many others, I fell out of love with wrestling. For numerous reasons, the product had gotten stale, the booking was awful, and the storylines were drawn out and dull. Often set with no clear end goal in mind but a “we’ll figure it out later” approach of the previous leadership, Vince McMahon.

Two Professional Wrestlers squaring up against each other in the ring.

But that’s all changed within the past year or so, thanks in large part to Vince McMahon being removed from the company and therefore allowing Paul “Triple H” Levesque to take control of creative. Triple H took a different approach to creating a wrestling show and brand. He focussed on long-term storytelling, foreshadowing things to come in later plots, and most importantly to fans, not letting his ego get in the way and letting the talent pitch ideas to him to then implement whilst also not actively punishing people for getting popular with the fans when they weren’t supposed to.

With that, the overall quality of the shows started to noticeably increase. With WWE under Triple H’s creative control, the company started to see ratings and buys increase. An increase in social media presence on apps like TikTok and YouTube allowed a new audience to become aware of the stories and moments that only Professional Wrestling is capable of.

For example, the storyline involving The Bloodline is a multi-year story that has drawn on events from the past involving Roman Reigns and his family members. Or with Cody Rhodes and his return to WWE, with his struggle to win the one title that his father The American Dream Dusty Rhodes never got to hold. This was then all enhanced further when Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson decided to take a stake in WWE’s parent company and decided to get involved again with the wrestling scene. Even played a key role in the major storyline of Cody Rhodes vs The Bloodline at last weekend's show.

This all culminated in last weekend's big show, which has been the largest Wrestlemania to date breaking almost every single previously held company record for one event. This was my first Wrestlemania back watching the product and honestly, this was one of the best bits of television I’ve watched. Multiple multi-year storylines all culminated together into one bigger-than-reality event, wrestling’s Avengers: Endgame, which was enhanced further by returning legends that many would recognise such as Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson but all this star power was matched with fantastic in-ring storytelling and highly skilled athletic manoeuvres. This event has been considered by many to be one of the greatest Professional Wrestling events of all time, only being rivalled by Wrestlemania X-7.

As the dust settles on Wrestlemania XL, it's clear that professional wrestling, under the innovative guidance of Paul "Triple H" Levesque, has entered a new golden age. This resurgence is not just about the record-breaking attendance or the millions glued to their screens; it's about a revitalised storytelling ethos that honours the legacy of wrestling while boldly steering it into the future. The success of WWE today, marked by intricate storylines and captivating characters, reflects a profound understanding of what fans crave: a blend of athletic prowess, narrative depth, and unexpected turns.

Wrestlemania XL wasn't just an event; it was a statement. A statement that professional wrestling has evolved beyond its perceived limitations, weaving the athleticism of sports and the drama of cinema into a unique experience that captivates audiences worldwide. As WWE continues to build on this momentum, the growth potential seems boundless. With a focus on long-term storytelling, embracing new media platforms, and fostering talent, the stage is set for an era where professional wrestling reclaims its spot not just as a niche entertainment form but as a mainstream spectacle.

In this renaissance, we are reminded that professional wrestling, at its core, is about the stories we see ourselves in – the struggles, the triumphs, and the unexpected twists of fate. As we look to the future, one thing is certain: the squared circle will continue to be a mirror to the human experience, reflecting our deepest desires for heroism, redemption, and the eternal battle between good and evil. The renaissance of professional wrestling is not just a revival; it's a reinvention, promising a future as bright and unpredictable as the storylines it weaves.