Why Greenland Matters to the United States, and Why Some People Are Sceptical

8 January 2026

Paul Francis

Want your article or story on our site? Contact us here

Greenland has become an increasingly prominent part of global geopolitical discussion, particularly in relation to the United States. On the surface, the interest can appear puzzling. Greenland has a small population, harsh conditions, and limited infrastructure. Yet for Washington, it represents one of the most strategically significant territories in the world.

Snow-covered mountains and rocky peaks rise above a deep blue sea, under a clear sky, creating a serene and majestic landscape.

At the same time, recent events elsewhere have led many observers to question whether security alone explains American interest in regions rich in natural resources. Greenland now sits at the intersection of strategic necessity and public scepticism.

Greenland’s strategic importance to US security

The primary and most consistently stated reason for US interest in Greenland is security.

Greenland occupies a crucial geographic position between North America and Europe. It sits along the shortest route for ballistic missiles travelling between Russia and the United States. This makes it essential for early warning systems and missile defence.

The US has maintained a military presence in Greenland since the Second World War. Today, Pituffik Space Base plays a key role in monitoring missile launches, tracking satellites, and supporting NATO defence architecture. These systems are designed to protect not only the United States but also its allies.

As Arctic ice continues to melt, the region is becoming more accessible to military and commercial activity. Russia has expanded its Arctic bases, and China has declared itself a near-Arctic state. From Washington’s perspective, maintaining influence in Greenland helps prevent rivals from gaining a foothold in a region that directly affects North Atlantic security.

The Arctic, climate change, and future competition

Climate change has transformed Greenland’s relevance. What was once largely inaccessible is now opening up.

New shipping routes could shorten trade paths between Asia, Europe, and North America. Scientific research, undersea cables, and surveillance infrastructure are all becoming more viable. Greenland’s location places it at the centre of these emerging routes.

For the United States, this makes Greenland less of a remote territory and more of a forward position in an increasingly contested region.

Red Mobil barrel secured with ropes on wood structure, against a cloudy sky. Blue pipes and rusty metal bar in background.

Oil and resource speculation as a secondary factor

While security dominates official policy discussions, resource speculation is often raised as an additional reason for interest in Greenland.

Greenland is believed to hold potential offshore oil and gas reserves, as well as deposits of rare earth elements, lithium, graphite, and other critical minerals. These materials are essential for electronics, renewable energy systems, and defence technologies.

It is important to note that Greenland currently restricts new oil and gas exploration licences, largely due to environmental concerns. Large-scale extraction remains difficult, expensive, and politically sensitive.

For the United States, oil is not a strategic necessity in Greenland. The country is already one of the world’s largest oil producers. However, critical minerals are a longer-term concern. The US remains heavily dependent on foreign supply chains, particularly from China, for many of these materials.

This makes Greenland attractive as a potential future partner rather than an immediate resource solution.

Why scepticism exists

Despite official explanations, scepticism persists, and not without reason.

In recent years, the United States has taken highly visible actions elsewhere that involved control over oil production and transport. These actions have reinforced a long-standing public perception that resource interests sometimes sit beneath security justifications.

The Iraq War remains a powerful reference point. Although the official rationale focused on weapons and security threats, the protection and control of oil fields became a defining feature of the conflict in the public imagination. That perception continues to shape how many people interpret US foreign policy today.

More recently, actions involving sanctions, tanker seizures, and control of oil revenues in other regions have revived these concerns. When military or economic pressure coincides with resource-rich territories, scepticism follows.

Against this backdrop, even legitimate security interests can be viewed through a lens of historical mistrust.

Greenland is not Iraq, but history shapes perception

Greenland differs significantly from past conflict zones. It is an autonomous territory within the Kingdom of Denmark, a NATO ally. The United States does not dispute Danish sovereignty and has repeatedly stated that Greenland’s future must be decided by its people.

US engagement in Greenland has focused on diplomacy, scientific cooperation, and defence partnerships rather than intervention. There has been no military conflict, no occupation, and no attempt to forcibly extract resources.

However, history matters. Public opinion is shaped not only by current actions but by patterns over time. When people see strategic interest combined with resource potential, they naturally draw comparisons.

Denmark’s role as a stabilising factor

Denmark plays a crucial role in shaping how Greenland is engaged internationally. As the sovereign state responsible for defence and foreign policy, Denmark ensures that US involvement occurs within established legal and diplomatic frameworks.

This partnership reduces the likelihood of unilateral action and helps keep Greenland’s development aligned with environmental standards and local governance.

The broader reality

Greenland’s importance to the United States is real, and it is primarily rooted in geography and defence. Resource speculation exists, but it is not the driving force behind current policy.

At the same time, scepticism is understandable. History has taught many people to question official narratives when strategic interests and natural resources overlap.

The truth lies in the tension between these two realities. Greenland matters because of where it is, what it enables, and what it may one day provide. How it is treated will determine whether it becomes a model of cooperation or another chapter in a long story of mistrust.

Greenland is not a prize to be taken, but a partner to be engaged. Whether that distinction holds in the long term will depend not just on policy statements, but on actions.

In a world shaped by climate change, great power competition, and historical memory, even legitimate interests must contend with the weight of the past.

Current Most Read

Why Netflix Is Circling Warner Bros, and How a Century-Old Studio Reached This Point

What Christmas 2025 Revealed About the Future of Consoles

The Timeless Allure of LEGO: A Christmas Gift That Unleashes Creativity

Paul Francis
Nov 22, 2023
3 min read

Young boy playing with Green Lego aircraft with a Christmas Tree in the Background

In a world dominated by digital entertainment, one classic toy continues to capture the imagination of both young and old – LEGO. As the holiday season approaches, LEGO sets become not just toys but gateways to endless possibilities. Did you know that an astounding 30 LEGO sets are sold every second in the run-up to Christmas? The appeal is undeniable, and it goes beyond just being a toy; it's a cultural phenomenon that has touched over 48% of the UK population at some point.

LEGO's success story is no accident. Amidst a landscape where many children are engrossed in video games, LEGO has not only maintained its relevance but has grown to become the world's largest toy company, surpassing even industry giants like Mattel. What's remarkable is that LEGO achieved this feat with a brick design that has remained relatively unchanged for over 60 years.

The enduring success of LEGO can be attributed to a few key factors:

1. Simple Yet Versatile Design: At the heart of LEGO's success is the iconic brick design – simple, versatile, and capable of sparking boundless creativity. This design has stood the test of time, proving that innovation doesn't always mean drastic change.

2. Recognizable Brand Equity: LEGO isn't just a toy; it's a brand that resonates globally. Loved by kids and adults alike, the brand has become synonymous with play, imagination, creativity, fun, learning, caring, and quality. The LEGO logo is a stamp of timeless entertainment.

3. Core Values: LEGO's commitment to core values such as "Play Well," fostering imagination, and creativity, and ensuring quality has built a strong foundation for the brand. These values are not just slogans but guiding principles that influence product development and experiences.

LEGO understood early on that the bricks, on their own, are just bricks. It's the experiences created around them that elevate LEGO to something extraordinary. From Legoland theme parks to blockbuster movies and engaging video games, LEGO has ventured into creating immersive experiences.

On a smaller scale, LEGO regularly collaborates with well-known brands, turning partnerships into unique experiences. Collaborations with NASA for space education, creating videos for Facebook's "Kronkiwongi" project, and crafting LEGO Speed Champions Series of vehicles with renowned car brands like Ferrari, McLaren, and Porsche are testament to their adaptability and innovation.

Young boy happy in front of a Pile of Lego

But what about the future? With projects like Augmented Reality in the works, LEGO is not merely resting on its laurels; it's actively evolving with the times. The company remains dedicated to enhancing the play experience, embracing technology while staying true to its core values.

As we marvel at the LEGO sets adorning store shelves this Christmas, let's appreciate not just the bricks but the enduring legacy of a brand that has shaped the childhoods of millions. In a world that constantly changes, LEGO stands as a beacon of timeless joy and creativity, promising to be a cherished part of our lives for generations to come.

LEGO lovers, Dive into these Captivating LEGO Facts:

LEGO’s founder, Ole Kirk Christiansen, crafted the name “LEGO” from the Danish words LEG GODT, meaning “play well.”
If you lined up the 340 million Minifigures produced last year, it would stretch almost 7,900 km – from London, UK to Beijing, China!
The famous LEGO brick we play with today is over 50 years old, with bricks from 1958 still fitting seamlessly with those made today.
The moulds used to produce LEGO bricks are accurate to within 0.002 mm, ensuring high quality; only about 18 bricks in a million fail to meet standards.
The world’s tallest LEGO tower is 28.7m high, made with 465,000 bricks!
LEGO Minifigures are the world’s largest population, with over 4 billion around the globe!
During Christmas, almost 28 LEGO sets are sold every second.
LEGO attractions like LEGOLAND Discovery Centre Manchester hire "Master Model Builders" – a dream job!
Laid end to end, the number of LEGO bricks sold in a year would circle the globe over five times.
On average, there are 80 LEGO bricks for every person on Earth.