Artemis II Returns From the Moon as Old Conspiracies Find New Life Online

9 April 2026

Paul Francis

Want your article or story on our site? Contact us here

A Mission in Motion, Not Preparation

Artemis II is no longer a promise or a plan. It is a live, unfolding mission.

Having successfully travelled beyond low Earth orbit and looped around the Moon, the crew are now on their return journey to Earth. In doing so, they have already secured their place in history as the first humans in more than half a century to venture into deep space. The mission itself has been widely followed, not just through official NASA channels but across social media, where images, clips and astronaut updates have circulated in near real time.

Among the most striking moments so far have been the views of Earth from lunar distance. These are not abstract renderings or archival references. They are current, high-resolution visuals captured by a crew physically present in deep space. For many, it has been a powerful reminder of both scale and perspective, reinforcing the reality of human spaceflight beyond Earth orbit.

Yet as these images spread, something else has travelled with them.

Earthrise over the Moon's horizon, showing Earth partially lit against the blackness of space. The Moon's surface is grey and textured.

The Return of a Familiar Narrative

Alongside the excitement and global attention, Flat Earth narratives have begun to reappear with renewed visibility. As with previous milestones in space exploration, the mission has acted as a catalyst rather than a cause.

Footage from Artemis II, particularly anything showing Earth as a curved, distant sphere, has been picked apart across various platforms. Claims of digital manipulation, lens distortion and staged environments have resurfaced, often attached to short clips or isolated frames removed from their original context.

This is not evidence of a growing movement in terms of numbers. It is, however, a clear increase in visibility. The scale of Artemis II has pulled these conversations back into mainstream timelines, where they sit alongside genuine public interest and scientific engagement.

Real-Time Content, Real-Time Reaction

What distinguishes Artemis II from earlier missions is the immediacy of its coverage. This is not a mission filtered through delayed broadcasts or carefully edited highlights. It is being experienced as it happens.

That immediacy has a double edge. On one hand, it allows for unprecedented access and transparency. On the other, it provides a constant stream of material that can be reinterpreted, clipped and redistributed without context.

A reflection in a window, a momentary visual artefact in a video feed, or even the way lighting behaves inside the spacecraft can quickly be reframed as suspicious. Once those clips are detached from their technical explanations, they take on a life of their own within certain online communities.

The speed at which this happens is key. Reaction no longer follows the event. It unfolds alongside it.

Scepticism in the Age of Algorithms

Flat Earth content does not exist in isolation. It is sustained by a broader culture of scepticism towards institutions, particularly those associated with government and large-scale scientific endeavour.

NASA, as both a symbol of authority and a source of complex, hard-to-verify information, naturally becomes a focal point. Artemis II, with its deep space trajectory and high visibility, fits neatly into that framework.

Social media platforms then amplify the effect. Content that challenges, contradicts or provokes tends to perform well, regardless of its factual basis. As a result, posts questioning the mission often gain traction not because they are persuasive, but because they are engaging.

This creates a distorted sense of scale. What is, in reality, a fringe viewpoint can appear far more prominent than it actually is.

The Broader Public Perspective

Outside of these pockets of scepticism, the response to Artemis II has been largely one of fascination and admiration. The mission has reignited interest in human spaceflight, particularly among audiences who have never experienced a live crewed journey beyond Earth orbit.

There is also a noticeable difference in tone compared to previous eras. The Apollo missions were moments of collective attention, where a single narrative dominated public consciousness. Artemis II exists in a far more fragmented environment, where multiple conversations unfold simultaneously.

In that landscape, it is entirely possible for celebration, curiosity and conspiracy to coexist without directly intersecting.

A Reflection of the Modern Media Landscape

The re-emergence of Flat Earth narratives during Artemis II is not an anomaly. It is part of a broader pattern that defines how major events are now experienced.

Every significant moment generates its own parallel discourse. One is grounded in reality, driven by science, engineering and exploration. The other is shaped by interpretation, scepticism and the mechanics of online engagement.

Artemis II, currently making its way back to Earth, sits at the centre of both.

The mission itself is a clear demonstration of human capability and technological progress. The conversation around it, however, reveals something different. It highlights how information is processed, challenged and reshaped in real time.

In that sense, Artemis II is not just a journey through space. It is a case study in how modern audiences navigate truth, trust and visibility in an increasingly complex digital world.

Current Most Read

Streamlining Small Business Operations for Maximum Efficiency

Posts Are Down, But Scrolling Isn’t: Are We Watching More and Sharing Less on Social Media?

Why your business should use Hashtags

ITK Magazine
Feb 26, 2024
2 min read

the Word Hashtags on a cave background covered in green moss — Image by Leonardo AI

A hashtag is a way of categorizing your content so that it can be found under a specific topic, event, theme, or conversation. Hashtags effectively gather together all types of content with the same ‘label’.

Your hashtag must always start with the hashtag symbol #, and they won’t work if you start adding spaces, punctuation or symbols. It’s worth doing a little research to ensure you’re using relevant and specific hashtags for your content.

So, why should your business use hashtags?

Your business can create its very own branded hashtags. This is useful when you wish to access UGC (User Generated Content). It makes it easy to find content that mentions you and your business, content that you can also share.

Hashtags can lead to increased engagement on your posts and can boost your brand's visibility - through likes, comments, and shares.

They can also help you summarise your social media post so that your audience knows which topic you’re talking about. This is good when you have a character limit, as you can save vital space by giving context to your post with a simple hashtag.

How do you find the right hashtags?

Now you know why you should be using hashtags, it’s time to find the best hashtags for you. One of the easiest ways to find relevant and effective hashtags is to monitor social media influencers who have an affinity with your topic - see what hashtags they’re using.

If you’re searching on Instagram for a hashtag, the app will show you hashtags that are relevant to the one you’re searching for. This can help you build an archive of related hashtags that you can refer back to.

Hashtags can also highlight news/trends and tell you what people are talking about. It’s then possible to ‘piggyback’ on these current news affairs or trends with relevant content. You can also purchase software that finds and analyses hashtags for you, so you don't have to do the hard work, which is perfect if you don’t have the time.

How many hashtags should you use on social media?

This depends on which social media platform you're using.

X (Twitter) - They recommend using no more than 1-2 hashtags, but there is no limit as long as you stay within your character limit.

Facebook - Just like Twitter, Facebook recommends sticking to 1-2 hashtags.

Instagram - There’s a limit of 30 hashtags for your Instagram feed and up to 10 in your stories. They recommend using between 5-10 on your feed posts.

YouTube - They limit the user to 15 hashtags, but advise that you use 2-3 hashtags in your posts.

LinkedIn - LinkedIn recommends using 1-2 hashtags on your posts.

Now you know how to use hashtags and how many to include, you’re ready to increase reach and engagement across your social media profiles.