Search Results

My adventure at university is continuing and, whilst it’s full on, with many lectures and extra work, I’m loving it. My adventure at university is continuing and, whilst it’s full on, with many lectures and extra work, I’m loving it. Going to university means meeting new people I wouldn’t necessarily encounter. Coming from a working-class town in Yorkshire, the ‘posh rugby lad’, with Rugby lad culture, is a type I’ve not met until now—I wish I never had. Arrogant, entitled, privileged young men, unfortunately, ruin the experience of university somewhat. It’s not every posh boy, but it does seem that the majority carry a disdain for working-class people—they don’t even try to hide their disrespectful opinions. They think they’re better than most other university students because Daddy paid their tuition fees. With the greatest of respect, we’re all at the same Russell group university. We all achieved the required grades to get there. Just because I’ve been loaned the tuition fees does not make me any less entitled to a place on my course. Luckily, because I’ve chosen to study computer science, the rugby lads aren’t constantly around me. Had I been on an engineering or economics course, however, my lecture theatre would’ve been full of Schöffel jackets, signet rings and mullets. Is this a generalisation? Yes. But generalisations are usually correct! This isn’t a depiction of every ‘rugby lad’, of course. I’ve met some rugby players who are genuine, kind, respectful people—but I do feel they’re in the minority. The consequence of the ‘posh boy’ culture means that some freshers, who would’ve liked to have played rugby at university, have become disengaged; they’ve looked elsewhere for something to do in their downtime. Some have turned to American Football, which appears to perpetuate a positive culture that allows for fun and banter whilst still remaining respectful. In other words: normalcy. The disrespect these posh rugby lads give women is of particular concern to me. Whilst it isn’t obvious at first, should you find yourself in a pub with a group of them, watch how they treat girls. Whilst their behaviour isn’t abusive, they appear to project a sense of ownership. They often throw their arms around females’ necks, in what I consider an almost aggressive manner, in order to assert their dominance. What infuriates me is how those around them accept their actions. The women they mix with don’t seem to have an issue with it— probably because they’re used to it—but when a rugby lad tries to do the same with a girl from a working-class background, she, quite rightly, reprimands their pathetic behaviour. I’m not alone in my opinion. As I write, I’m surrounded by my flatmates who are working hard on their many different courses; they all agree that most rugby lads are disrespectful, or at the very least, irritating. Alcohol is definitely a factor in determining the level of respect these young men are able to show. Whilst sober, they can appear normal, and I can actually enjoy having a conversation with them. When drunk, however, their Dutch courage is far too high, and their sense of entitlement becomes intolerable. It’s a shame, as I really enjoy watching rugby, but as soon as a drop of booze hits these guys’ bloodstreams, I don’t want to be in their company, as they simply resort to disrespecting or belittling anyone who’s not one of them. I’ll conclude by again reiterating that there are exceptions to every rule. Whilst ‘posh rugby lads’ are not my favourite type of person, that doesn’t make them awful human beings. It’s just a case of different upbringings—and this is why university is so good. It brings people together from all walks of life. Learning how to accommodate and appreciate others is one of the greatest lessons available at university…it’s just not on the curriculum.

A few days ago, like many others my age, I found myself mindlessly scrolling through TikTok. In the midst of this digital detour, a familiar clip caught my attention: a 45-second snippet from Dexter, season one. Instantly, memories of the dark and captivating show flooded back. Dexter, with its unique twist on the crime drama formula, follows the life of a forensic expert who moonlights as a vigilante serial killer. The series masterfully combined psychological drama and thrilling suspense, as viewers were constantly on edge, wondering if Dexter would be caught or if he'd continue balancing his double life. So, naturally, it being TV Gold, I decided to revisit it. Once again, I was pulled into Dexter's world—watching him struggle to control his urges, manage his personal life, and wrestle with his growing understanding of human emotion. Everything was just as gripping as I remembered... until I reached season 6. For anyone familiar with the show, it's no secret that this is where Dexter started its infamous decline. The storytelling faltered, and the final season's ending is still regarded as one of the most disappointing conclusions in TV history. But Dexter isn't the only show to fall victim to this curse. Many series, once beloved, have suffered from sudden drops in quality or finales that left fans feeling betrayed. In this article, I'll explore some of the biggest offenders—shows that, like Dexter, failed to stick the landing after soaring to early success. The Walking Dead After finishing The Walking Dead, it’s hard not to feel like the show lost its way. In the beginning, it was an intense, character-driven drama set against the backdrop of a zombie apocalypse, with real emotional weight behind every death and decision. The stakes were high, and the early seasons kept us on edge, wondering who would survive and how the group would navigate a world torn apart by the undead. But as the seasons dragged on, the magic faded. Storylines became repetitive, characters seemed to be stuck in endless cycles of conflict, and the tension that once defined the show slowly fizzled out. What started as a groundbreaking series with gripping moments ended up feeling more like a long, drawn-out battle that never quite delivered the payoff we’d been waiting for. Lost: And then there’s Lost, a show that, for a while, felt like it was rewriting the rules of television. It wasn’t just a drama, it was a puzzle. The characters, the cryptic Dharma Initiative, the ever-present smoke monster, and the constant flashes between past, present, and future had viewers hooked. Week after week, it had fans theorising about everything from the meaning of the island to the fate of each survivor. We all became armchair detectives, analysing every detail, convinced that it was all leading to some grand revelation. But as the seasons progressed, cracks started to show. Plotlines became more convoluted, and it felt like the writers were piling on mysteries without offering satisfying explanations. By the time we reached the finale, what was once a show driven by its intricate mysteries collapsed under the weight of them. The ending was deeply polarising, what should have been a mind-blowing resolution ended up being a confusing spiritual conclusion that left far too many questions unanswered. Why was the island so special? What was the purpose of the countless twists? And what happened to half of the things we spent seasons obsessing over? For many, Lost wasn’t just a disappointment, it was a betrayal. After six seasons of investing in the characters, the lore, and the endless mysteries, fans were left with a conclusion that felt like it abandoned the very things that made the show so compelling in the first place. It wasn’t just about unanswered questions; it was about the feeling that all that suspense and excitement had led nowhere. The show that started as a cultural phenomenon ended with one of the most divisive finales in TV history. How I Met Your Mother: How I Met Your Mother was a sitcom that captured hearts with its humour, quirky characters, and narrative structure that kept fans hooked. The show’s premise—a father recounting the long story of how he met his kids’ mother—was a clever twist that gave the series emotional depth beyond the usual sitcom fare. For nine seasons, we followed Ted and his friends through their highs and lows, eagerly anticipating the moment he would meet "the one." As the seasons progressed, fans became deeply invested, not just in the romantic journey, but in the friendships and life lessons woven throughout. But when the much-anticipated finale arrived, it left many viewers disappointed. After all the build-up surrounding the mother, she was introduced only to be quickly written out, dying off-screen. In a final twist, the story pivoted back to Robin, Ted’s original love interest, undoing much of the character development and emotional investment in Ted’s journey. What could have been a heartwarming conclusion felt rushed and out of sync with the show’s previous messages. Fans were left feeling cheated, as years of storytelling and character growth were overturned in a matter of minutes. The finale didn’t just underdeliver—it reshaped the entire narrative, leaving a once-beloved show with one of the most divisive endings in TV history. Game Of Thrones: Game of Thrones was a cultural phenomenon, renowned for its intricate storytelling, complex characters, and shocking twists. For much of its run, the show masterfully blended political intrigue, epic battles, and morally ambiguous characters, keeping viewers on the edge of their seats. It wasn’t just the spectacle that drew people in—it was the rich, layered narrative that left fans debating theories and dissecting every detail between seasons. From the brutal power struggles of Westeros to the looming threat of the White Walkers, Game of Thrones felt like it was building toward an epic, unforgettable conclusion. But in its final season, the show’s momentum came to a screeching halt. With just a few episodes to wrap up years of intricate plotlines, the pacing felt rushed, and character arcs that had taken seasons to develop were abruptly abandoned. Daenerys Targaryen’s sudden descent into madness, Jaime Lannister’s unexpected reversal, and the underwhelming resolution of the White Walker threat all left fans reeling. The once carefully plotted political intrigue gave way to hasty decisions that felt out of sync with the slow-burn storytelling the show was known for. The final episode, in particular, was a point of contention, as the fate of the Iron Throne and the series' main characters left many feeling unsatisfied. What could have been a legendary, lasting legacy was instead marred by an ending that felt rushed and disjointed, turning one of the greatest TV shows of all time into one of the most controversial.

A generic trademark (sometimes called a genericised trademark or proprietary eponym) is a brand name that becomes so synonymous with a particular item that it effectively ‘becomes’ that item. The best examples of generic trademarking (in the UK) are Hoover and Sellotape. Hoover, in particular, is the most generic term for a vacuum cleaner in the United Kingdom. So much so that, when I worked for a high street electronics retailer, customers would come in and ask for a ‘Dyson Hoover’ or ‘LG Hoover’.  This can be both a blessing and a curse. It's nice to think that your brand or product is so synonymous with a particular item that people don't refer to it any other way; however, it can mean losing legal trademarking and protection over that name.  ‘ Sellotape ’, owned by a company in Winsford, Cheshire, is a generic term for adhesive tape. ‘Trampoline’ is originally a trademark of the Griswold-Nissen Trampoline and Tumbling Company. Both companies have lost any legal protection against their brand names being used as generic terms for the items they’re associated with.  Many companies today will seek any means necessary to stop their trademarks and products becoming generic. The biggest of these is Google.  Google have actively discouraged various publications from referring to web searches as ‘googling’, to avoid their brand becoming a generic trademark. In fact, both the UK’s Oxford English Dictionary and the US’s Websters Dictionary define google (all lower case) as a verb with the meaning ‘to use the Google search engine to obtain information on the Internet.’ Some companies have fallen foul of their own hubris on certain products. The Otis Elevator Company lost both trademarks for ‘elevator’ and ‘escalator’ because they excessively used the terms in their own advertising campaigns. This saw the public use the term whenever they referred to a ‘vertical cable transport machine’ or ‘motor driven staircase’. When Westing House Electric Corporation made their own escalators, the courts and trademark office concluded that, as Otis had used its own trademarks in a generic way, the terms would be subject to genericisation, which allowed Westing House and anyone so inclined to use the names freely. Generic terms can be country- and even age-based. My daughter, who’s thirteen, turned to me recently and asked for a ‘band-aid’ to cover a blister. I would have asked for a ‘plaster’, a word derived from the company name Elastoplast, which is the biggest seller of adhesive bandages in the UK. My daughter, however, watches a lot of US television and (with my approval) some American YouTube channels; these use the term ‘band-aid’ to describe adhesive bandages.  Below are more generic trademarks, some of which may surprise you: Aspirin Still trademarked in several countries, but it’s now a generic term for basic pain relief tablets.  Airfix Used in the UK to describe plastic scale model kits that are put together by hand.  Astroturf Artificial grass, trademarked by Monsanto Company. Biro Used commonly in the UK to describe a ballpoint pen. Owned by Societe Bic. Bubble wrap Common term for inflated/cushioned packaging-type material. Trademark owned by the Sealed Air company. Cashpoint A common way to describe cash machines; this trademark is owned by Lloyds Bank. ChapStick Lip balm brand owned by Pfizer. Comic Con A shortened term used for comic book conventions, this is actually a trademark owned by San Diego Comic-con international.  Dictaphone Used to describe a dictation machine trademarked by Nuance Communications.  Ditto This was initially used to describe the Spirit Duplicator, which was manufactured by the Ditto Corporation of Illinois. It was initially a term for ‘copying’. Filofax Term used to describe a personal organiser, the trademark was originally owned by the Letts Filofax Group.  Frisbee A flying disc toy initially created by Wham-O. Hoover Widely used as a noun and verb for a vacuum cleaner.  Hula Hoop Another trademark by Wham-O. Jacuzzi Referring to a hot tub or whirlpool bath created by the Jacuzzi company. JCB Commonly used in the UK to refer to an excavator with both a front loader and backhoe. Owned by J. C. Bamford. Lava lamp Refers to a liquid motion lamp made by Mathmos.  Mace Term used for pepper spray. Memory stick Owned by the Sony corporation, it’s typically used to refer to all USB flash drives. Nintendo Used mainly in the 1980s and early 90s to refer to a Video Games Console. ‘He’s been playing Nintendo,’ was a common phrase.  Onesies Used to describe an adult bodysuit and was initially trademarked by the Gerber Products company. Photoshop Photoshop is a software program owned by Adobe, though it’s often used a term for any software that edits photos. Ping Pong Trademarked by Jaques and Son and later passed to Parker Bros, who still try to enforce the trademark in the US. Plasticine Modelling clay that has a putty-like substance to it. Often used for clay animation.  Powerpoint Slide show presentation software owned by the Microsoft corporation. Used commonly to refer to all presentations.  Pritt Stick Owned by Henkel, it’s common in the UK to be as a generic term for any glue stick. Rollerblade A specific type of inline skate made by Nordica.  Scalextric Generic term, mainly in the UK, to describe slot car races. Owned by the Hornby Railway company. Stanley Knife A utility knife popularised by Stanley Works in the UK. Styrofoam The common term for polystyrene foam. Incorrectly used in the US for disposable cups plates and coolers, which are actually made from a different type of polystyrene.  Super Glue A name for the Cyanoacrylate adhesive made by the Super Glue Corporation, the term is interchangeable for all brands of glue. Tannoy Commonly used in the UK for any Public Address (or PA) system. Tannoy was a British manufacturer of loudspeakers and PA systems. Tarmac Used to describe asphalt road surfaces. Surprisingly, the trademark is owned by the Tarmac company. Thermos A vacuum-insulated flask initially trademarked by Thermos GmbH. Tipp-Ex Common in the UK to refer to any brand of white correction fluid. Owned by Tipp-Ex GmbH & Co. Tupperware Trademarked by Earl Tupper after they made plastic storage containers popular in the 1940s.  Uber A relatively new term for any online taxi service.  Vaseline Often used by consumers as a generic term for petroleum jelly. Owned by Unilever. Velcro Still trademarked by Velcro Companies, this has become a verb for a hook-and-loop fastening. Walkman Sony Corporation lost the use of this trademark in Austria in 2002, as it was deemed to have passed into common use. Used to describe a personal stereo player (usually, the cassette variant).  Zeppelin This is a common term used to describe a rigid airship that was initially developed by German company Luftschiffbau Zeppelin. The company is still in operation today with over 7000 employees.  Zimmer Frame Many walking frames are referred to as Zimmer Frames, the trademark for which is owned by Zimmer Holdings.

On Friday the 20th of September, McDonalds fans across the UK received an email that would later become a major point of conversation. The email appeared to be sent out by mistake to people who had signed up for the McDonald’s marketing emails for new promotions but what made this email different to previous ones was the content of it. The email was simply titled “McRib_Test.email” and featured an image that linked to a 404 page on the McDonald’s website with the image being simply titled “McRib_Image_Final_Final_16.10.24.jpg”. This has led fans to believe the beloved limited time item might be making a return to British shores. The McRib made its UK debut in 1981, not long after it was introduced in the United States. McDonald’s hoped that the sandwich, featuring a boneless pork patty moulded to look like ribs, would be a hit in the UK as it had been in select markets in the U.S. However, it failed to resonate with British consumers, possibly due to differing tastes and unfamiliarity with barbecue flavours that weren't as widespread in the UK at the time. By 1985, the McRib was quietly pulled from UK menus due to low demand, marking the end of its initial run. While it vanished in the UK, its cult following in the U.S. began to grow, slowly turning the sandwich into a beloved (and missed) item, known for its scarcity After three decades of absence, the McRib made a brief but celebrated return to the UK in 2015. This limited-time promotion lasted only five weeks, during which die-hard fans and curious newcomers flocked to McDonald’s to try the fabled sandwich. Its return was part of a global McDonald’s strategy to generate excitement by reintroducing popular discontinued items for short periods. But why is the McRib so elusive in the UK compared to America where it routinely reappears? Well it's not just a clever marketing plot, it turns out its a logistical issue. The primary reason McDonald’s UK has limited the McRib’s availability is tied to how their kitchens are set up. The McRib patty is made from pork, and McDonald’s UK restaurants generally lack the grill capacity to cook pork and beef products at the same time. Since McDonald’s typically prioritises beef burgers, offering the McRib on a permanent basis would require significant changes to their cooking processes. Maybe McDonald’s have found a solution to this issue which could be why the item is rumoured to reappear in October or maybe this was just a way to generate buzz and get people talking and thinking about McDonalds again after the company has had a slump in profits in 2024.

The Humble Origins: KêChiap in Ancient China In today’s world, it’s hard to imagine a kitchen without a bottle of ketchup nestled among the condiments. It’s the beloved companion of fries, burgers, and all things grilled. But little do most people know, the journey of ketchup started long before tomatoes and burgers even existed. Our story begins centuries ago, not in America or Europe, but in the bustling markets of ancient China. There, among the fragrant herbs and spices, merchants traded a peculiar sauce known as “kêchiap.” Unlike the thick, red ketchup we recognize today, this sauce was dark, thin, and salty. It was made from fermented fish, brine, and spices—a far cry from the sweet tomato concoction now adorning modern dinner tables. This early version of ketchup was highly prized for its umami-rich flavour, the kind that made even the simplest dishes more delicious. Crossing Oceans: British Sailors and the Birth of Ketchup in Europe As kêchiap spread across Southeast Asia, it took on new names and forms. Sailors from the British Empire, always on the lookout for new flavours to take home, stumbled upon this sauce in the 17th century while trading in Malaysia and Indonesia. Fascinated, they decided to bring back the recipe to England. Back home, British cooks began experimenting, trying to recreate this exotic sauce using ingredients available in their own cupboards. However, without the proper fish and spices of Southeast Asia, they had to improvise. Mushrooms, walnuts, oysters—nothing was off limits in the pursuit of that savoury depth. For decades, ketchup in England was more likely to resemble a tangy mushroom sauce than anything we’d put on a burger today. The Tomato Revolution: Ketchup Takes a New Turn Then came the tomato. In the early 19th century, this curious fruit was still a novelty in Europe and America. Enter James Mease, an American horticulturist, who in 1812 penned what is believed to be the first recipe for tomato ketchup. His version mixed tomato pulp with brandy and spices, setting the stage for a transformation that would change ketchup’s fate forever. But there was still a problem. Early tomato ketchups lacked the shelf life needed to be stored for long periods, often turning rancid. Preserving Perfection: Vinegar, Sugar, and the Modern Ketchup Recipe Along came the mid-1800s, and with it, an innovation that would solidify ketchup’s place in culinary history: vinegar. By adding vinegar to the mix, manufacturers found they could extend the sauce’s life. To balance the acidity of the vinegar and tomatoes, sugar was added. This tweak made the sauce not only last longer but also gave it the sweet, tangy flavour profile that began to capture the hearts—and taste buds—of the masses. Heinz and the Rise of Commercial Ketchup By the late 19th century, the Heinz company, known for its commitment to quality, began mass producing tomato ketchup, bottling the new and improved recipe for households across America. Unlike its early fermented fish sauce ancestor, Heinz ketchup was smooth, sweet, and thick—perfect for dipping, dolloping, and spreading. It quickly became a household staple, finding its way to dinner tables, diners, and fast food restaurants around the globe. A Condiment with an Unexpected Past And so, what started as a fermented fish sauce in ancient China has taken an extraordinary culinary journey across centuries and continents, transforming into the iconic tomato ketchup we now know and love. It’s a story of adaptation and global influence, proof that even the simplest of condiments can have a rich and surprising history. Next time you reach for that bottle of ketchup, remember that you’re tasting the legacy of sailors, chefs, and centuries of flavour experimentation—a condiment with an unexpected past, now living on in its perfect place beside fries and burgers.

As a long-time Warhammer 40,000  fan and a self-proclaimed fanboy of the grimdark universe, I’ve been eagerly awaiting Warhammer 40,000: Space Marine 2 . After spending several hours diving into both the single-player and multiplayer modes, I can confidently say this game ticks all the boxes for what I love about the Warhammer 40K  franchise—gore, absurd violence, and religious fanaticism. Whether you're a veteran of the lore or new to the world of 40K, this game brings the brutality and richness of the universe to life in spectacular fashion. A Return to the Grimdark Future Developed by Saber Interactive and published by Focus Entertainment, Space Marine 2  is the highly anticipated sequel to the original Space Marine  game. Released for PlayStation 5, Xbox Series X|S, and PC, this third-person action game places you once again in the power-armoured boots of Lieutenant Titus, a character who has undergone significant changes since the events of the first game. Titus, once Captain, was demoted to Lieutenant after being censured for his exposure to Chaos during the events of the original Space Marine . His censure and subsequent fall from grace add depth to his character, and it’s fascinating to see how the narrative addresses this as Titus returns to the battlefield to defend humanity. The Imperium of Man, as always, is in peril, and it’s up to the Ultramarines, led by Titus, to fend off a massive Tyranid invasion. Space Marine 2 Story and Setting In Space Marine 2 , Titus faces the Tyranid Swarm, a biological horror that consumes everything in its path. The game takes players to various stunningly crafted locations, from war-torn cities to alien-infested worlds. Saber Interactive has done a remarkable job of capturing the grim beauty of the Warhammer 40K  universe, where every battlefield feels monumental and suffocatingly hopeless—exactly as it should in a universe defined by eternal war. The story focuses on Titus' redemption and his role as a battle-hardened veteran. The fact that he was demoted adds a layer of intrigue to the plot, showing that even Space Marines, the Imperium’s greatest defenders, are not immune to the machinations of the Inquisition. Gameplay and Co-op Excellence One of the highlights for me has been the cooperative experience. Last night, my brother and I spent several hours playing the PvE section called ‘Operations’, and it was nothing short of fantastic. The missions are beautifully designed and expertly set up for players versus computer play. As we fought alongside other Ultramarines, battling endless waves of Tyranids, the sense of scale and danger was palpable. The three-player co-op mode is fluid and engaging, allowing friends or random players to team up online to take down the Tyranid hordes. The tactical synergy required for this co-op makes it a highly satisfying experience, especially as each player’s chosen Space Marine class complements the others. In addition to the PvE Operations, Space Marine 2  also features a solid single-player campaign, where you can play solo or bring friends along to experience the carnage in co-op mode. This option adds an extra layer of replayability, allowing for multiple approaches to each mission depending on your team setup. Multiplayer Mayhem Beyond the co-op campaign, Space Marine 2  boasts a 12-player PvP mode called Eternal War , which is perfect for those looking for competitive multiplayer action. In this mode, players can choose between different Space Marine classes, such as Tactical, Assault, Vanguard, Sniper, Heavy, and Bulwark. Each class has its unique abilities and gear, offering a diverse experience that’s deeply customizable. What’s more, players can unlock Chapter presets or even kitbash their own custom Space Marine Chapters, adding a fun layer of personalization to the gameplay. The PvP battles are intense, with various factions going head-to-head, including Ultramarines versus Heretic Legionaries, each class offering specific combat advantages. The frenetic pace of these multiplayer skirmishes is further enhanced by the wide variety of maps and free updates promised by the developers, which include new enemies and weapons to keep things fresh. Why Every 40K Fan Should Play This Game For me, Warhammer 40,000: Space Marine 2  is an absolute joy to play. It captures the essence of the 40K universe—relentless warfare, towering Space Marines, and a galaxy in eternal conflict. The visceral combat, deep customization, and stunning environments all add to the immersive experience that fans of Warhammer 40K  have come to expect. Whether you’re a fan of the Adeptus Astartes, a lore enthusiast, or just love an action-packed game with breathtaking visuals, Space Marine 2  should be on your radar. Even if you’re not particularly fond of Space Marines, the sheer scale and spectacle of this game make it a must-play for anyone invested in the Warhammer 40K  universe. This is a game made by fans, for fans, and it delivers in every aspect. For any die-hard Warhammer 40K  fan, Space Marine 2  is not just a game—it’s an essential experience that brings the grim darkness of the far future to life in a way that few other games have. Prepare to dive into the madness, and remember: in the grim darkness of the far future, there is only war. Space Marine 2 is available from several online stores including the Microsoft Store , the PS Store and Steam

According to Paul Young, co-owner of Spiffy, The Happiness Shop, we should build time into our busy schedules to worry. This may sound a strange thing to do; however, unnecessary worrying affects many people, and it can have a detrimental effect on their lives.   Human beings, in their caveman days, worried only about where their next meal was coming from, and ensuring they were not on the menu of hungry sabre-toothed tigers on the prowl. The worry as to whether their basic needs would be met was still inherent in Homo Sapiens in 10,000BC, which isn’t that long ago when you consider that they first appeared approximately 288,000 years prior.   In 2022AD, food is plentiful. We also have heat, shelter, clean(ish) air, access to clean water, clothing and the safety to go to sleep at night, etc. Most human beings’ needs on our planet today are easily met.   We don’t often find ourselves in life-threatening situations in the modern world; however, our brains have not adapted to this shift. They may not need to be concerned about sabre-toothed tigers, but that doesn’t mean they switch off. Instead, they create worries and problems for their hosts to solve.   There’s a well-known piece of advice relating to stress: will what you’re fretting over matter in five years’ time?  If it’s not significant enough to impact your life in the not-too-distant-future, it’s not worth worrying about in the here and now, experts claim.   I get the premise behind that well-meaning advice, but often, I don’t feel in control of my worry. I suffer from acute anxiety in a number of real-life situations; however, once I’m out of, or away from, these scenarios, my anxiety disappears. Aimless worrying, in comparison, tends to stick around.   Though I don’t sit and worry for hours on end, as a woman of a certain age, I’m not immune to the menopausal hormone drop that occurs between 2am and 4am. Should I wake during this time window, I may as well not bother trying to get back to sleep—and this is when my worrying mind is most active.   In the early hours, I worry about job-related work I’ve to complete the next day, even though I know it will all be in hand when I get going. I worry about the life admin I’ve to sort. I worry about little details that are important and which I’d forgotten, and I worry whether I’ll still remember them when I wake up. I worry about my kids, even though they’re both adults with their own lives. Like everyone, I worry about money and whether I’m spending too much. I worry about things I’ve said, the things I’ve done. I ultimately worry that my worries are preventing me from getting much-needed sleep.   It's exhausting.   Young suggests setting time aside to address your worries rather than letting them pop up whenever they please. When you are able to concentrate on them, he recommends writing down your concerns on a piece of paper, so that you can scrutinise them properly. He believes this will give you some perspective, and seeing them written down may also make it easier to apply logic, which will help you determine the most appropriate solution. It’s important to remember that there’s only so much of your daily life that’s within your control. You’re not responsible for the emotions/actions of other people or outside influences such as the economy and the weather. Your first task, therefore, it to eliminate any worry about such things—it’s simply a waste of your energy if you can’t do anything about the outcome. What will happen will happen, regardless of any mental anguish you extol.   Young suggests that freelancing individuals can particularly benefit from this approach. As people who tend not to have a regular income, finances may be a particular worry amid the current cost-of-living crisis.   If worries are left to fester, they can affect an individual’s focus, which will have its own detrimental impact on their productivity, which surely makes Young’s suggestions worth a try.   Paula Gardner of the The Good Therapy Practice  agrees that freelancers can be more susceptible to worry, which could be, she suggests, a result of remote working. When working from a shared office space or your employer’s business premises, it’s satisfying to physically shut the door on your working day. This sense of closure helps individuals exercise their boundaries, which may be a task more difficult for remote workers, whose home lives and working environments exist in the same space.   Because we don’t have to hunt for our food anymore or switch into survival mode umpteen times a day, we need to give our mind enough to do so that it doesn’t turn rogue and create mountains out of molehills. Read, take up a hobby, practice mindfulness, go for a walk, or just zone out in front of the TV if this is distracting enough for you. Get into a good routine before bedtime to ensure a decent night’s sleep—such as no phones or tablets in the bedroom, a relaxing bath, a milky drink…there are lots of suggestions online in this regard, just find what works for you.   Worrying for worry’s sake is unhealthy and a waste of your time. Put pen to paper and proactively tackle your concerns head on.

The long-anticipated showdown between Manchester City and the Premier League has officially begun. A legal saga four years in the making is now set to unfold as the current Premier League champions face an unprecedented 115 charges of financial misconduct. This case could not only shake the foundations of Manchester City but also redefine the financial landscape of English football. The consequences? Potentially game-changing for the Premier League and beyond. The Stakes: More than Just a Points Deduction While football clubs have previously faced sanctions for financial mismanagement, Manchester City’s case is of an entirely different magnitude. The accusations date back to the 2009-10 season and encompass a broad spectrum of alleged violations. From financial dealings with sponsors linked to club owners to understated player and managerial contracts, these charges paint a picture of systematic rule-breaking. If the club is found guilty, the repercussions could be seismic. While a points deduction is the most likely immediate consequence, the spectre of more severe penalties looms large. The idea of title stripping—potentially erasing some of the club's glory years—or even expulsion from the Premier League are on the table. A ruling of this scale could throw the current season into chaos and forever alter the club’s history. Comparisons to Past Offenders: How Does Manchester City Stack Up? City isn't the first club to find itself in hot water over financial rule breaches. The recent case involving Everton Football Club provides an intriguing point of comparison. In 2023, Everton was found guilty of breaching the Premier League's profit and sustainability rules. Their punishment was a 10-point deduction—significant, but not nearly as earth-shattering as what Manchester City could face. Everton’s violations were largely centred around accounting practices and financial losses over a specific period. In contrast, Manchester City’s case covers a nine-year span, with allegations including failure to disclose full manager remunerations, potentially through secret contracts. Manchester City's Defence: Confidence or Bluff? Manchester City maintains a steadfast public front. The club has welcomed the independent commission, eager to present its “comprehensive body of irrefutable evidence.” Club manager Pep Guardiola has echoed the club’s position, emphasising the importance of due process and asserting that "everyone is innocent until guilt is proven." For City, the stakes are not just about maintaining their place in the Premier League but safeguarding their reputation as one of the elite footballing giants of the modern era. A Verdict That Could Shake Football to Its Core While the hearing is set to last around ten weeks, the decision, expected early next year, could become a watershed moment in football history. The potential penalties—points deductions, fines, or even relegation—could serve as a stern warning to other clubs about the strict enforcement of financial regulations. But if Manchester City is cleared of all charges, it would highlight the limitations of the current regulatory system and force the Premier League to reconsider its approach to financial governance. The outcome might also open a floodgate of legal battles. Rival clubs who feel disadvantaged by Manchester City’s alleged financial misconduct could seek compensation, potentially leading to a series of lawsuits that further entangle the league in legal complexities. Comparisons to UEFA's Past Financial Scrutiny This isn’t the first time Manchester City has faced accusations of financial foul play. In 2020, UEFA handed the club a two-year ban from European competitions for alleged breaches of Financial Fair Play (FFP) regulations, a decision that was later overturned by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS). However, City still received a €10 million fine for obstructing the investigation. The Premier League's current charges go even further, suggesting potential systematic rule-breaking over a longer period. The club's prior brush with UEFA adds an extra layer of tension, as the ongoing case could either validate or undermine the integrity of financial regulations in European football. Conclusion: The Wait for Justice As the hearing gets underway, football fans and clubs around the world are watching with bated breath. Manchester City’s fate hangs in the balance. Whether the club emerges vindicated or faces unprecedented sanctions, the decision will undoubtedly set a precedent for how financial conduct in football is scrutinised and punished in the future. Should City be found guilty, it would serve as a clear signal that no club, no matter how powerful or successful, is beyond the reach of the rules. However, an acquittal would raise serious questions about the Premier League’s ability to govern its clubs and enforce financial fair play. In either scenario, English football is bracing itself for a defining moment. The game is changing, and today marks the start of its most pivotal trial.

There I was, on a crisp summer’s morning on the first weekend in September. Going about my usual day of food shopping at our local supermarket when I noticed something peculiar. As the temperature caused me to sweat with a nice cool 20C, a strange sight lay before me. “It’s Christmas Time!” the newly opened section of the supermarket proclaimed. Filled to the brim with perishable Christmas foods and Christmas themed gifts. Bemused by the sight, I pulled out my phone, wondering if between the freezer sections I had time travelled to the middle of November when these sections are usually up and everywhere. Only to see that the date read “4th September”. Confused, I wondered, why are the Christmas items and sections out for sale in early September? Surely most people would think this is too early to start getting into the Christmas spirit and filling yourself full of mince pies. After all, if you bought them now they’d pass their best before or use by dates before Christmas was even upon us. So my question is, when is too early for Christmas for these supermarkets? Every year since I can remember it’s felt like supermarkets are opening their Christmas sections earlier and earlier. It used to be reserved for December and maybe November, but now you’d have a harder time finding a supermarket without a Christmas section in the summer. What is it that is driving this? Well for starters about 30% of Brits reportedly start their christmas shopping in September so maybe these sections are to cater to this sizable portion of the public that are in need of things like wrapping paper, gift bags, and christmas cards so that they can get things ready as they go throughout the months towards the big day. But whilst this answers the question about gift wrapping and gift bags etc it then raises the question of, why do they need baked goods like mince pies that will go off before December even arrives? Well apparently, once again, another sizable portion of the population do. By the time November comes around a reported 5.5 million mince pies were sold. So despite them being a very seasonal item that people tend to enjoy in the days leading up to winter, a good portion of our nation loves this British sweet treat so much that they’ll have it as soon as they hit shelves in early September. So I guess the lesson from this is that there apparently isn't a too early. The supermarkets make money off it otherwise they wouldn’t do it which means plenty of people are buying these goods all across the UK. Even if most of us wouldn't want to be reminded of the fact that the summer is coming to an end and with it comes the cold and ice of winter and of course the rapid commercialisation of our longest traditions.

As a huge fan of Ahoy, I can confidently say that there’s nothing quite like the unique art and video style that Stuart Brown presents on his channel. From the first time I watched one of his videos, I was captivated by the meticulous attention to detail, the clean and minimalist visuals, and the soothing cadence of his narration. Stuart Brown’s voice is in a league of its own—both informative and comforting, guiding viewers through complex histories and technical analyses with an ease that few can match. But What Is Ahoy? Ahoy is a YouTube channel created by Stuart Brown, a master of video essays primarily focused on video games, gaming history, and the technology that powers them. The channel is renowned for its deep research, high production quality, and engaging storytelling. Each video is not just a presentation of facts but a carefully crafted narrative that ties together historical, cultural, and technical insights in a way that feels both educational and entertaining. Stuart Brown  himself is a bit of an enigma—a meticulous researcher, a talented storyteller, and a skilled visual artist. His work on Ahoy reflects his deep passion for gaming and technology, but it’s also clear that he has a broader interest in history and culture. Brown’s ability to connect these fields makes Ahoy’s content appeal not just to gamers but to anyone with an interest in media studies, history, or technology. The target audience  of Ahoy is diverse. While the core viewership undoubtedly consists of gamers and tech enthusiasts, the channel’s reach extends to historians, artists, and educators. Ahoy’s content is accessible to a wide range of viewers because it transcends the typical boundaries of gaming channels—each video is a piece of art, a historical document, and a narrative journey all rolled into one. Unveiling the Gems: Ahoy’s Must-Watch Videos With a catalogue of exceptional content, selecting the best Ahoy videos is a challenging task, but there are certain videos that stand out for their depth, creativity, and impact. Here are five of the most remarkable ones: "The First Video Game" (2014): This video dives into the origins of video games, exploring early contenders for the title of "first" video game. From "Tennis for Two" to "Spacewar!," Stuart Brown uncovers the roots of gaming with his signature blend of thorough research and engaging storytelling. It’s a fascinating exploration of how the medium began, and it raises thought-provoking questions about what truly constitutes a video game. "A Brief History of Graphics" (2016): A visual and historical journey, this video tracks the evolution of computer graphics from the earliest pixelated images to the stunning photorealism of today’s games. Brown’s ability to explain complex technical concepts in an accessible way makes this video a must-watch for anyone interested in the intersection of art and technology. "The Story of Doom" (2017): "Doom" is one of the most iconic first-person shooters ever made, and this video tells the story of its creation, impact, and enduring legacy. Brown delves into the cultural phenomenon that "Doom" became, offering insights into why it continues to be a touchstone in gaming history. The video is a perfect blend of technical analysis and cultural commentary. "Polybius: The Game That Doesn't Exist" (2017): One of Ahoy’s most popular and talked-about videos, this documentary explores the urban legend of "Polybius," a mysterious arcade game rumoured to cause psychological effects in players. Brown’s investigation into the myth is masterful, blending history, speculation, and eerie storytelling in a way that keeps viewers on the edge of their seats. Community Favorite: "Iconic Arms: The AK-47" (2015) No discussion of Ahoy would be complete without mentioning the "Iconic Arms" series, and the video on the AK-47 is a standout. In this video, Brown explores the history of the AK-47, its cultural significance, and its representation in video games. It’s a fascinating look at how a single piece of military hardware became an icon, both in the real world and in the digital realms of gaming. The video is a community favourite for its in-depth analysis and the way it ties together historical and cultural threads. The Four-Byte Burger: A Symbol of Digital Ingenuity One of the more unusual but deeply fascinating topics covered by Ahoy is the "Four-Byte Burger," which Stuart Brown discusses in his video "A Brief History of Graphics." The "Four-Byte Burger" is an early piece of computer art, representing a hamburger created using only 4 bytes of data—just 32 bits. When this artwork was created, computer memory and processing power were extremely limited. Despite these constraints, early digital artists and programmers managed to create recognizable images like the "Four-Byte Burger." This piece of art is not just a quirky footnote in the history of computer graphics but also a testament to the ingenuity of early digital pioneers. It’s a symbol of how creativity can flourish even within the strictest of limitations and a reminder of the humble beginnings from which modern digital art has evolved. Why Ahoy Deserves Your Attention Ahoy is not just a YouTube channel—it’s a masterclass in how to create compelling, informative, and visually stunning content. Stuart Brown’s unique approach to video essays makes each upload a treat for anyone interested in video games, history, or technology. Whether you’re drawn in by the minimalist art style, the meticulously researched content, or Brown’s soothing narration, there’s something in Ahoy’s catalogue for everyone. For those of us who are fans, Ahoy is more than just a source of entertainment—it’s a source of inspiration, education, and a deeper appreciation for the rich tapestry of gaming history. https://www.youtube.com/@XboxAhoy/featured

Yesterday, McDonald’s introduced an exciting new range of menu items across the UK, including an entirely new drink and the return of some fan-favourite offerings. The latest addition to the menu is the never-before-seen Twix Latte, a coffee-based drink infused with Twix-flavored syrup, topped with caramel cream, and finished with a sprinkle of Twix crumbs. Priced at £2.69 for a medium and £3.29 for a large, this drink promises to satisfy both your caffeine and chocolate cravings. Alongside the new latte, McDonald’s has brought back the popular Philly Cheese Stack burger and Mozzarella Dippers. The Philly Cheese Stack, a hit when it debuted last October, is packed with two beef patties, a rich cheese sauce, two slices of cheese, crispy and grilled onions, and pickles, all served in a toasted bun. It’s available for £5.29 on its own or £7.19 for a medium meal. The Mozzarella Dippers, which are breadcrumb-coated mozzarella sticks served with a salsa dip, return in packs of three for £2.39 or a sharebox of nine for £6.49. Other returning favorites include the Chicken Big Mac, Galaxy Chocolate McFlurry, and Twix Caramel McFlurry, offering even more variety to the McDonald's experience. Yesterday, we went to sample some of these new and returning items ourselves, opting for the Mozzarella Dippers and the Philly Cheese Stack. The Mozzarella Dippers are one of those items that can be hit or miss, depending on how fresh they are. When freshly made, as they were during our visit, they were warm, gooey, and satisfying. However, once they cool down, they lose their appeal, becoming cold chunks of cheese encased in breadcrumbs. If you're dining in, these can be a worthwhile choice, but if you're planning to take them away, you may be left disappointed. The Philly Cheese Stack, on the other hand, is a standout. It first launched last October and immediately became one of my favourite burgers at McDonald’s. The combination of beef patties with both grilled and crispy onions gives it a unique "fairground" burger vibe, unlike anything else on the menu. The patties are distinct in size—not as thick as a Quarter Pounder, but not as slim as those in a Double Cheeseburger—and the creamy cheese sauce elevates this burger to near gourmet status. I personally would love to see this become a permanent fixture on the menu. If you haven’t had the chance to try these new items yet, I recommend giving them a go. Whether you’re craving something sweet like the Twix Latte or looking to indulge in the rich, savoury flavours of the Philly Cheese Stack, there’s something for everyone to enjoy.

The Unbelievable Happened In a twist that no one saw coming, Oasis, the band that defined British rock in the '90s, is reuniting. Liam and Noel Gallagher are putting aside their infamous feud (for now) to bring the music back. For fans who’ve spent the last 15 years holding onto the hope that this day would come, the announcement felt like a dream come true. But as with anything involving the Gallaghers, the news has sparked a whirlwind of reactions, ranging from pure elation to utter disbelief. Social Media Erupts: A Collective Cheer and a Few Chuckles As soon as the reunion was confirmed, social media practically melted down. For many, the return of Oasis is a cultural event on par with the second coming exaggeration, perhaps, but the passion is real. Fans immediately flooded platforms like Twitter and Instagram with a mix of memes, nostalgic tributes, and tongue-in-cheek comments. One particularly viral post quipped, "The world has healed," a sentiment echoed by thousands who saw the reunion as a sign of better times ahead. Ticketmaster Chaos: The Price of Nostalgia The initial euphoria was soon tempered by frustration as fans tried to get their hands on tickets. The rush to secure seats for what’s being dubbed "the reunion of the century" led to widespread complaints about Ticketmaster’s handling of sales. The site crashed repeatedly under the demand, leaving many fans fuming. Worse still, Ticketmaster’s controversial dynamic pricing system sent ticket costs soaring, with some fans reporting prices jumping to as much as £415 for standard seats. The backlash was swift, with many calling for an investigation into the fairness of these practices. Yet, despite the outrage, tickets for the reunion shows sold out almost instantly. For those lucky enough to snag one, the anticipation is palpable. For the rest, the hope of additional dates rumoured to be in the works offers a glimmer of hope. From Celebrities to Supermarkets: Everyone Has Something to Say It’s not just the fans who are buzzing. Celebrities and public figures have been quick to join in the conversation. Manchester’s Mayor, Andy Burnham, took to social media to declare that the city was "having another moment," hinting at the cultural resurgence that the Oasis reunion could spark. Even brands got in on the actionJohn Lewis cheekily noted a spike in searches for bucket hats, a nod to Liam’s enduring influence on British fashion. And then there are the musical tributes. Irish pop duo Jedward celebrated the news with a cover of "Wonderwall," a moment that perfectly encapsulated the blend of reverence and lightheartedness that surrounds Oasis’s music. The reunion isn’t just a big deal for rock fans; it’s a cultural event that’s resonating across the board. The Fans’ Perspective: This Means Everything For Oasis fans, this reunion is much more than a concert tour; it's a chance to reconnect with a band that shaped their lives. The band’s music, with its raw emotion and anthemic sound, captured the spirit of a generation. Songs like "Live Forever" and "Don’t Look Back in Anger" are more than just tracks; they’re the soundtrack to countless personal stories. The thought of hearing those songs live again, with Liam’s gravelly voice and Noel’s impeccable guitar work, is enough to bring grown men to tears. But this reunion also comes with a sense of trepidation. The Gallaghers are famous for their volatility, and many fans are wondering whether the brothers can keep it together for the entire tour. There’s a certain thrill in the unpredictability, though after all, part of Oasis’s appeal has always been the drama. As one fan wryly noted on Twitter, "Oasis is back, and so is the drama. I wouldn’t miss it for the world." Conclusion: The Rollercoaster Begins As the world prepares for Oasis’s return in 2025, one thing is clear: this reunion is already making history. Whether it will lead to new music or simply serve as a nostalgic farewell, the impact is undeniable. Fans are gearing up for what could be the most talked-about tour of the decade, and the world is watching to see if the Gallaghers can pull it off.