6 British Products That Are Surprisingly Banned in Other Countries (Here’s Why)

26 June 2025

Connor Banks

Want your article or story on our site? Contact us here

From haggis and Marmite to Kinder Eggs, there are everyday British staples that raise eyebrows (and red tape) overseas. Some of these familiar items are considered risky, unhealthy, or just plain illegal in countries like the USA and Canada, even though they’re part of everyday life in the UK.

Here are six things that are completely normal in Britain — but are either banned, heavily restricted, or controversial abroad.

1. Haggis – Off the Menu in the USA

A brown haggis on a dark plate with a spoon resting beside it on a woven mat. Two glasses with amber liquid in the blurred background.

Haggis may be divisive, but for many Scots (and those who appreciate a bit of tradition), it’s part of the national identity. Made from minced sheep offal — including lungs, which is the sticking point here — haggis has been banned in the US since 1971.

The US Department of Agriculture considers sheep lungs unsafe due to the potential risk of contamination during slaughter. Even though millions of people in the UK eat it without issue, American regulations err on the side of caution. So if you're wondering, "Can you bring haggis into the US?" The answer is no.

2. Kinder Surprise – A No-Go in the States

Kinder Surprise egg leaning against a white candle on a beige surface. Soft focus background with neutral tones.

Yes, really. Those little chocolate eggs with the plastic toy inside are illegal in the US. According to FDA regulations, food products cannot contain non-edible embedded objects, due to choking hazards for children.

While they’ve got a separate version called Kinder Joy (which splits the toy and chocolate into two compartments), it lacks the charm of the original. So if you're searching "Why are Kinder Eggs banned in the US?" It's all about safety laws.

3. Raw Milk – A Legal Grey Area Abroad

Cow with yellow ear tags in field, looking at camera under a clear blue sky with scattered white clouds. Bright, calm setting.

In Britain, raw (or unpasteurised) milk is a niche but legal product, often sold at farm shops or directly from dairies. It’s appreciated for its richness and flavour, and seen by some as a more "natural" option.

However, in many US states, Canada, and other countries, raw milk is either banned or tightly regulated. Public health authorities warn about the risks of bacterial contamination, including Listeria, E. coli, and Salmonella.

So while it’s legal and available in the UK under certain conditions, in the US, it’s largely treated as a public health risk.

4. Marmite – Once Banned in Denmark

Marmite jar with yellow lid labeled "Elton John Limited Edition" on patterned surface, spotlighted against a dark background.

Marmite is a uniquely British staple. But in Denmark, it was temporarily removed from shelves in 2011 because of its added vitamins and minerals, which hadn’t been pre-approved under Danish food regulations.

It wasn’t banned due to any direct health risk; it simply didn’t meet bureaucratic requirements. So, "Is Marmite banned in Denmark?" Technically, it was, though it can now be found in limited quantities.

5. Irn-Bru (Original Recipe) – Banned in Canada

Scotland’s iconic bright-orange soft drink, Irn-Bru, used to contain a synthetic dye called Ponceau 4R (E124). While permitted in the UK, it’s banned in Canada due to concerns about hyperactivity in children and allergic reactions.

Though Irn-Bru has since been reformulated, the original recipe remains banned. So if you’re Googling "Is Irn-Bru banned in Canada?" — the answer is yes, at least in its original form.

6. Toys Inside Food – Not Allowed in the USA

Cute pink-eared figure sits atop a creamy dessert in a hand. Urban street with soft lights in the blurry background. Playful mood.

The US really doesn’t like surprises in its food, especially if they’re small plastic toys. Beyond Kinder Surprise eggs, any food product that contains a hidden non-edible object is considered a choking hazard and banned by the FDA.

So even if something passes UK and EU safety regulations, in America it’s a no-go. That includes novelty sweets or promotional snacks with toys hidden inside.

It’s interesting how the same everyday product can be perfectly acceptable in one country and completely banned in another. Whether it’s due to food safety concerns, bureaucratic red tape, or simply different cultural norms, these bans show just how subjective "safe" can be.

So if you're travelling or posting a parcel abroad, it’s worth double-checking what’s allowed. That jar of Marmite or humble Kinder egg might just be contraband where you’re headed.

Current Most Read

Nuclear Tensions Today: Understanding the Risks and Diplomatic Efforts

TikTok Ban Looms: Millions of Users Could Be Affected

Paul Francis
Jan 9
3 min read

On January 19, 2025, TikTok, one of the world’s most popular social media platforms, faces a potential ban in the United States. If enacted, the ban could impact over 170 million U.S. users who rely on the platform daily for entertainment, education, and business. This significant move stems from a 2024 law requiring ByteDance, TikTok’s Chinese parent company, to divest its U.S. operations. Failure to comply would result in TikTok being removed from app stores and blocked by internet service providers across the country.

TikTok: A Short History of Global Success

TikTok’s journey began in September 2016, when ByteDance launched the app as Douyin in China. Within a year, ByteDance released an international version, rebranding it as TikTok. The platform exploded in popularity after its 2018 merger with Musical.ly, a U.S.-based app that focused on lip-syncing videos. This move not only expanded TikTok's user base but also solidified its foothold in Western markets.

TikTok's algorithm, which curates personalized content for users based on their interests and interactions, became its defining feature. By 2024, TikTok had over 1.04 billion monthly active users worldwide, with U.S. users alone spending an average of 95 minutes per day on the app. This translates to nearly 24 hours a month of consistent engagement, with content spanning everything from viral dance challenges to educational tutorials.

The platform is not just a hub for creators; it has become an essential marketing tool for brands and a primary income source for influencers. Businesses of all sizes use TikTok to reach younger demographics, with Gen Z and millennials making up the majority of its user base.

The Court Case: Allegations of Spying and National Security Risks

The legal controversy surrounding TikTok stems from concerns that ByteDance could share U.S. user data with the Chinese government, an allegation TikTok and ByteDance have consistently denied. In April 2024, the U.S. government passed the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act (PAFACA). This legislation required ByteDance to sell TikTok’s U.S. operations or face a nationwide ban by January 19, 2025.

The Department of Justice has emphasized that the app poses a significant national security risk. They argue that the Chinese government could exploit TikTok’s access to U.S. user data for espionage purposes, despite ByteDance’s assertions that U.S. data is stored on servers outside of China.

ByteDance has countered with legal challenges, claiming that the law infringes on First Amendment rights and suppresses free speech. As the deadline looms, the Supreme Court is set to make a critical decision, balancing concerns about national security with the constitutional rights of millions of users and creators.

Potential Fallout for the Tech Industry

A TikTok ban could send ripples across the tech industry, especially for foreign-owned applications operating in the U.S. If TikTok is banned due to its ownership structure, other non-U.S.-based platforms could face heightened scrutiny. This could result in stricter regulations, potential bans, or even demands for foreign companies to establish U.S. subsidiaries or sell assets.

The case raises broader questions about the future of the global tech landscape. Could governments worldwide follow suit, restricting access to apps based on their country of origin? Such actions could lead to a fragmented internet, where digital platforms are siloed based on national boundaries and geopolitical alliances.

Implications for Creators and Businesses

For creators and businesses, the stakes are high. TikTok has become an indispensable platform for reaching audiences, generating income, and driving brand awareness. A ban would force creators to migrate to other platforms, potentially disrupting their income streams and reducing their reach. Businesses reliant on TikTok advertising would need to pivot their strategies, potentially investing more heavily in alternative platforms like Instagram Reels, YouTube Shorts, or Snapchat.

The Future of TikTok

As the January 19 deadline approaches, millions of users, creators, and businesses are left in limbo. The Supreme Court’s ruling will not only determine TikTok’s fate in the U.S. but also set a precedent for how governments regulate foreign-owned technology in the future. Regardless of the outcome, this case underscores the complex intersection of technology, politics, and national security in an increasingly interconnected world.

TikTok’s potential ban serves as a wake-up call for businesses and creators to diversify their digital strategies and consider the broader implications of a globalized tech landscape shaped by geopolitical tensions. The next few weeks will be critical for the platform’s future—and for the millions who depend on it.