Stop crying your heart out,   Oasis is reuniting!  The moment fans have been dreaming of for 15 years, Liam and Noel Gallagher have put their differences aside to put on a show, touring the UK.  Talk Tonight?  Clearly, they finally did! Oasis's rise to fame started in 1991, in Manchester. Liam Gallagher was the singer, and Noel the guitarist and songwriter. Their album Definitely Maybe, released in 1994, became the fastest-selling debut in UK history at the time. This was then followed by (What's the Story) Morning Glory?, released in 1995, which included Wonderwall, Don’t Look Back in Anger, and Champagne Supernova, all now iconic songs. Alongside Blur, they became the face of Britpop. Oasis are unique because they symbolised 1990s working-class pride and British spirit through both their personalities and their music. They famously played to over 250,000 fans over two nights at Knebworth in 1996. Oasis eventually split in 2009 in Paris after Noel said that he "simply could not go on working with Liam." Both brothers moved on to solo careers, throwing jabs at each other in interviews and on social media. Once this iconic duo split, Noel Gallagher formed Noel Gallagher’s High Flying Birds, which earned him successful solo albums. Liam Gallagher formed Beady Eye with other former Oasis bandmates and later released his own solo albums, As You Were and Why Me? Why Not. Liam often begged for Oasis to reunite, but Noel didn’t like the idea and said it was "not worth it." Both Gallagher brothers hinted at a reunion; for example, Liam aimed songs at Noel during live shows, and Noel hinted that "the door was never completely closed" in an interview in 2023. When Oasis finally confirmed the reunion, the initial announcement included a world tour, starting with major UK cities. However, there are rumours that they could headline Glastonbury, Reading, and Leeds. Noel and Liam are both involved, but Bonehead and Guigsy’s return hasn’t been confirmed. They have also hinted at making one or two new tracks to perform on the tour, but Noel has said that they want to "celebrate the old songs first." The main focus will be on Definitely Maybe and (What's the Story) Morning Glory?. In their interviews, it is clear that there is still tension between the two, but they are putting their differences aside for the fans and, most likely, the money. So even though they say they’ve made peace, I say we shouldn’t  put our lives in the hands of a rock ’n’ roll band  just yet. The Oasis reunion isn’t just another tour; it’s history, the revival of an era that shaped Britpop. Fans never thought they would see the day. However, I think we are all wondering: can the Gallagher brothers really stay civil? Maybe they will live forever … or at least long enough to play Wonderwall one more time.

If you know me, you know I love a good Marvel film.  So when news broke about the recent title change for the upcoming Thunderbolts movie, I had to dive into it.   Let’s talk about the marketing behind this move and why it has fans split. From Thunderbolts* to The New Avengers Originally, the film was listed with a temporary title: Thunderbolts, a name familiar to Marvel fans who know it represents a team of anti-heroes and morally grey characters.  But recently, the title was updated to The New Avengers, and yes, that asterisk was intentional.  It allowed Marvel to keep the placeholder flexible and change it later.  Now, it’s been changed, and people have noticed. A smart marketing move? Personally, I think this was a clever marketing strategy.  By dropping such a loaded title change, Marvel ensured that people would be talking, and they are. This shift has sparked online conversation, speculation, and fan theories.  The name “The New Avengers” instantly brings weight, suggesting a new chapter and possibly a merging of characters from different corners of the MCU.  It builds excitement and keeps the buzz going. Or a spoiler too soon? However, not everyone is thrilled.  Some fans feel the title gives away too much and spoils what could have been a major reveal in the film.  If you’re someone who avoids trailers and rumours to go into a movie fresh, this kind of update might feel like it ruins the surprise. My take While I get why spoiler-averse fans are frustrated,  I also think the backlash might be a little overblown.  The title change suggests a direction but doesn’t necessarily give away the how or why. In a cinematic universe this complex, a name alone rarely tells the full story. In the end, I’d call this a bold and calculated move by Marvel, one that got people talking, and that’s what great marketing often aims to do. What do you think? Was this a smart strategy or a spoiler misstep?

Rating: 7.5/10 – A strong post-Mania outing with memorable moments and well-executed storytelling Copyright WWE WWE Backlash 2025 came live from the Enterprise Centre in St. Louis, Missouri, and it delivered a night full of solid wrestling, intriguing developments, and a few genuine surprises. While not every bout was a show-stealer, the overall presentation and narrative progression made for an enjoyable evening. Let’s break it down in match card order. United States Championship Fatal 4-Way: Jacob Fatu (c) vs. Damian Priest vs. Drew McIntyre vs. LA Knight The perfect choice to open the show - fast-paced, high-energy, and dripping with tension. Each competitor brought something unique: Drew’s brute force, Priest’s unpredictability, LA Knight’s charisma, and Fatu’s raw dominance. This match didn’t just entertain - it moved storylines forward beautifully. The real headline was the surprise debut of Jeff Cobb, who intervened to help Fatu retain his title, seemingly under orders from Solo Sikoa. What made the moment particularly compelling was Fatu’s visible confusion—he clearly hadn’t been clued in on the plan, and it sets up fascinating internal tension within this Bloodline 2.0 which was absolutely needed particularly with the injuries to Tama Tonga and Tonga Loa. A thrilling way to start the night and a great bit of storytelling. Women’s Intercontinental Championship: Lyra Valkyria (c) vs. Becky Lynch Match of the night, no question. This was the moment Lyra Valkyria needed, and she delivered in spades. Becky was superb in the veteran role, pushing Lyra to her limits, while Lyra finally got to showcase her full potential on a major stage. The in-ring storytelling was layered and emotionally charged, with well-timed false finishes and a clear narrative arc of the underdog stepping up. This didn’t just get Lyra over with the fans - it got her over with me. A star-making performance, and a brilliant match from start to finish. Intercontinental Championship: “Dirty” Dominik Mysterio (c) vs. Penta This was good, but not their best. The action was crisp and engaging, and both men put in a solid shift, but it didn’t quite match the level of their previous clash on RAW, which still stands as their strongest effort to date. Still, it served its purpose in advancing the ongoing story. JD McDonagh’s presence added tension, and Dom retained in typical fashion, keeping his heel momentum rolling. Not a show-stealer, but a decent middle-of-the-card contest. Gunther vs. Pat McAfee This turned out far better than I anticipated. I expected a semi-competitive match that would risk diluting Gunther’s aura, but instead, we got a masterclass squash. Gunther dominated, as he should, but Pat McAfee played his part to perfection and even got a few hope spots, even if they were quickly put back down again by the Ring General. There was just enough drama to give fans a sliver of hope, without ever truly threatening Gunther’s dominance. It protected both men—Gunther remained a beast, and McAfee left with his credibility intact thanks to his resilience and the crowd’s support. A brilliant bit of booking. Main Event – Undisputed WWE Championship: John Cena (c) vs. Randy Orton This was a classic - everything a final chapter between two legends should be. Cena and Orton crafted a bout steeped in nostalgia, packed with callbacks to their many battles over the years. The pacing was deliberate, the crowd was hot, and every near-fall had weight. Orton, performing in his hometown, gave it everything. Cena matched him step for step. The late interference from R-Truth was a fun call back to the previous Smackdown's where Truth had said he wanted to help his childhood hero, and most importantly,y didn’t take anything away from this spectacle. If this really was their last encounter, it was a fitting and emotional conclusion to one of WWE’s greatest rivalries. Backlash 2025 may not be remembered as an all-time classic, but it absolutely delivered where it needed to. It elevated new stars, progressed key storylines, and gave fans plenty to talk about. With standout performances from Lyra Valkyria, the surprise debut of Jeff Cobb, and the powerful send-off for Cena vs. Orton, it was a well-rounded and thoroughly enjoyable event. A strong 7.5 out of 10, and a reminder that Backlash can still feel like a big deal when booked right.

In an age of rapid technological advancement, surveillance is no longer a passive act. Live Facial Recognition (LFR) technology has moved from science fiction into the heart of modern policing and commercial security systems. Able to scan faces in real time and match them to watchlists within seconds, it promises efficiency, safety, and even crime prevention. But with these promises come serious questions about legality, accuracy, ethics, and trust. As this technology continues to spread across public streets and private retail spaces alike, we must ask: is LFR ready for widespread use, or is it running ahead of the safeguards designed to protect our rights? What is Live Facial Recognition? Live Facial Recognition (LFR) is a biometric surveillance tool that uses real-time video feeds to detect and identify faces. Unlike static facial recognition, which analyses images after an event has occurred, LFR operates live. Cameras scan crowds, extract facial features, and compare them to a database of preloaded images. If the system detects a potential match, it alerts a human operator to intervene or investigate. LFR is being trialled and used by several police forces in the UK, including the Metropolitan Police and South Wales Police. Retailers, stadiums, and event organisers are also deploying the technology in an attempt to identify shoplifters or detect banned individuals before trouble starts. How Does It Work? A Closer Look LFR involves several distinct technical steps. At its core, it is powered by artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms trained on vast datasets of facial images. The process typically unfolds as follows: Face Detection First, the system identifies a face within a video frame. This step uses computer vision models to detect facial structures such as the eyes, nose, and jawline. This is not identification yet; it is simply recognising that a face is present. Alignment and Normalisation Once detected, the system adjusts the face to account for differences in head tilt, lighting, or distance. This is known as normalisation. The aim is to ensure that all faces are processed in a similar format so that they can be compared reliably. Feature Extraction The system then uses a deep learning model, often a convolutional neural network, to extract features from the face. These are translated into a biometric template, a mathematical vector that represents the unique aspects of that person’s face. Matching This template is then compared against a watchlist. The system calculates a similarity score between the live face and each entry in the database. If the score passes a predefined threshold, the system flags it as a match. A human operator is usually involved at this stage to confirm or reject the result. This entire process happens in seconds, enabling real-time surveillance across public or private spaces. The Case For LFR Proponents argue that LFR is a valuable tool for modern policing. It can identify wanted criminals, locate missing persons, and even prevent terrorist acts before they happen. In retail settings, it promises to reduce shoplifting and protect staff from repeat offenders. Unlike traditional methods, it allows for rapid identification without the need for physical interaction or delays. The technology also allows for more efficient use of resources. Officers can be directed to individuals flagged by the system, rather than relying solely on observation or tip-offs. In theory, this reduces the burden on police and enhances public safety. The Case Against LFR Despite its promise, LFR is far from perfect. One of the main concerns is accuracy . Studies have shown that LFR systems are more likely to produce false positives for people with darker skin tones and for women. These errors are not trivial. A mistaken identity can result in an innocent person being stopped, searched, or even arrested. There is also the issue of bias in training data . If an algorithm has been trained primarily on certain demographics, it will perform less effectively on others. In real-world conditions, such as low lighting or crowd movement, these problems can become even more pronounced. Beyond technical flaws, legal and ethical questions loom large . In the United Kingdom, there is currently no specific law governing the use of LFR. Its deployment relies on a complex mesh of data protection laws, human rights principles, and operational guidance. Critics argue that this legal uncertainty leaves too much room for misuse. A 2020 Court of Appeal ruling found South Wales Police’s use of LFR to be unlawful, citing insufficient safeguards, inadequate impact assessments, and the risk of discriminatory practices. The ruling did not ban the technology outright but signalled that current uses are walking a legal tightrope. Potential Misuse and the Chilling Effect One of the most troubling aspects of LFR is its capacity for mass surveillance . By scanning every face in a crowd, it treats everyone as a potential suspect. This blanket approach has been described as disproportionate and invasive by privacy groups such as Big Brother Watch and Liberty. There is also the risk of function creep . A system introduced to identify serious offenders could, over time, be expanded to monitor protests, track political activists, or even control access to public spaces based on social or behavioural metrics. Furthermore, the use of LFR by private companies raises concerns about data ownership and accountability . Retailers may share watchlists across multiple sites or even with law enforcement, all without the consent or knowledge of the individuals being scanned. This could lead to people being unfairly banned, blacklisted, or targeted, based on secretive and unchallengeable criteria. Is It Fit for Purpose? At present, the evidence suggests that Live Facial Recognition technology is not ready for widespread deployment. While it offers considerable potential, its use is outpacing the development of ethical, legal, and technical safeguards. In its current state, LFR is more likely to erode public trust than to enhance security. Without robust legislation, transparent oversight, and significant improvements in accuracy and fairness, LFR risks doing more harm than good. Surveillance should not come at the cost of civil liberties or human dignity. As with all powerful technologies, its benefits must be balanced against the risks, and right now, that balance appears off. LFR is a powerful tool with a fragile foundation. Its strengths lie in speed and scale, but its weaknesses—bias, error, and lack of transparency—cast a long shadow. Until these flaws are addressed, caution must guide its use. In the race to embrace smart surveillance, we must not forget the human rights and democratic values that underpin our society. Watching the watchers may be just as important as watching the streets. Images provided by Leonardo AI

Let’s be blunt: Trump’s back, and he’s at it again.  This time, the world's loudest ego has aimed his firehose of bluster at - wait for it - the film industry . Yes, the man who once appeared in "Home Alone 2" for a blink-and-you’ll-miss-it cameo now believes he’s the saviour of American cinema. His brilliant plan? A 100% tariff on all foreign-made movies . Image created on Leonardo AI From where I sit here in the UK, knee-deep in actual film production work, this idea isn’t just bonkers - it’s catastrophic . For the global film ecosystem, for creative freedom, and, ironically, for the very American workers Trump claims to protect. Britain’s Booming Film Industry? Consider It Gutted The UK has spent decades building a reputation as a world-class production hub. Studios like Pinewood and Leavesden are not just film sets - they’re economic engines. Hollywood giants come here for our talent, locations, tax breaks, and yes, our tea. It's a beautiful partnership. Trump’s tariffs threaten to destroy that. A 100% levy on films made abroad? That turns a financially smart decision - filming in the UK - into a fiscal nightmare for American studios. Why pay double to shoot here when you can stay in Georgia or New Mexico, even if it means compromising creative vision? The knock-on effect? Job losses. From camera operators and costume designers to local vendors and VFX artists, thousands of British workers could lose gigs overnight - all thanks to a man who thinks trade policy is a blunt instrument to be swung like a golf club. The Irony of “America First” Trump says he wants to bring jobs home. But in reality, he's undercutting the very global partnerships  that sustain the U.S. industry. Hollywood doesn’t exist in a vacuum. It thrives on international collaboration. You can’t “America First” a Marvel movie when half the VFX are done in London, the score’s recorded in Prague, and you’re shooting in the Scottish Highlands because Los Angeles doesn’t have castles. And let's not forget: foreign markets are keeping Hollywood alive . China, the UK, South Korea, Germany - all contribute billions in box office revenue. Piss off your partners with idiotic tariffs, and don’t be surprised when they stop importing your movies. Creativity Shouldn’t Be Nationalised Filmmaking is, at its core, a borderless art. It’s the alchemy of cultures, influences, and shared storytelling. Trying to dictate where stories can be told - under the guise of “economic patriotism” - is creative suffocation. Imagine telling Denis Villeneuve he can’t shoot in Budapest, or Greta Gerwig she must ditch that Parisian dream sequence. Art doesn't respond well to artificial walls. A Final Word from Across the Pond To my American friends in the industry: we stand with you. We know this isn’t your doing. But we also urge you to speak up, loudly. Because if Trump’s tariffs become reality, it’s not just the UK that suffers - it’s all of us. Audiences will get fewer films. Creators will face tighter constraints. And the film industry, once a shining example of international cooperation, will be reduced to another casualty of one man’s nationalist fantasy. Call it what it is: protectionism wrapped in paranoia. And the world deserves better.

On May 7th, India confirmed that three of its fighter jets were downed following retaliatory strikes by Pakistan , marking the most significant military escalation between the two nuclear-armed neighbours in years. This follows India’s May 6th operation, dubbed “Operation Sindoor,” in which precision air and missile strikes were launched against alleged terrorist infrastructure across the Line of Control in Pakistan-administered Kashmir. Why Did India Strike Pakistan? The Indian government stated the strikes were a direct response to the April 22nd terrorist attack in Pahalgam , Indian-administered Kashmir, which killed 26 civilians, most of them Hindu tourists. India has attributed the attack to Pakistan-based militant groups , including Lashkar-e-Taiba  and Jaish-e-Mohammed . Pakistan has denied involvement, claiming the groups act independently of the state and condemning the Indian operation as an act of aggression that killed civilians, including women and children. The Kashmir Conflict: A Flashpoint Since 1947 Tensions between the two nations are rooted in the 1947 partition of British India , which led to the creation of India and Pakistan and triggered the first Indo-Pakistani war over the princely state of Jammu and Kashmir . That conflict left the region divided, with both countries administering separate portions but each claiming it in full . The Kashmir dispute has been the cause of three full-scale wars—in 1947, 1965, and 1999 —and numerous cross-border clashes. Terrorism and Retaliation: The Ongoing Security Dilemma India continues to accuse Pakistan of sponsoring cross-border terrorism , while Pakistan views India’s presence in Kashmir as an occupation. The long-standing proxy war  dynamic makes accountability difficult and de-escalation complicated. The latest strikes represent a notable shift from surgical, covert operations to open military engagements,  with both countries engaging in tit-for-tat air operations. International Reactions to the India–Pakistan Conflict The United Nations  and major global powers have called for calm. The United States , China , and Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC)  countries are pushing for diplomatic dialogue  to prevent a broader conflict. Meanwhile, international air travel across South Asia  has been disrupted as tensions rise, with numerous flights cancelled or rerouted. What’s Next for India and Pakistan? Both governments face domestic pressures  that make diplomacy difficult. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has taken a hardline stance on national security, while Pakistan’s leadership—amid fragile economic recovery—must also show strength to domestic audiences. As military assets mobilise on both sides, the risk of escalation remains high . Without clear diplomatic engagement, the region faces the danger of an extended conflict between two nuclear-armed states.

In an age where truth is often a casualty of war, Ukrainian journalist Victoria Roshchyna stood as a defiant exception. A fearless voice amidst chaos, her commitment to reporting from the frontlines of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine cost her everything—including, ultimately, her life. AI image of Press officer in a Warzone A Promising Voice from Zaporizhzhia Born in 1996 in the industrial city of Zaporizhzhia, Victoria Roshchyna began her journalistic career young, covering courts and crime as a teenager. But it was the seismic shock of Russia’s full-scale invasion in 2022 that reshaped her path—and gave rise to some of the most courageous journalism of the war. Working with outlets such as Hromadske, Ukrainska Pravda, and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, Roshchyna became known for going where few dared. She reported from the besieged city of Mariupol, from occupied territories, and from communities terrorised by Russian shelling. Her focus wasn’t just on bombs and battle lines, but on the people living through them. Victoria Roshchyna First Detention - and Defiant Return In March 2022, Roshchyna was detained by Russian forces while reporting in Berdiansk, southeastern Ukraine. She was held for 10 days, subjected to interrogation, and coerced into recording a video thanking her captors. The experience would shake many—but not Victoria. She published her harrowing account of that detention, then returned to the front. Later that year, she was awarded the International Women’s Media Foundation’s Courage in Journalism Award—an honour she declined to collect in person, choosing instead to continue her work in the field. Disappearance in Occupied Territory On August 3, 2023, Roshchyna vanished while investigating alleged secret detention facilities near the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant—an area under Russian control. For months, her family and colleagues pleaded for answers. Russian authorities refused to confirm her whereabouts until April 2024. By then, it was too late. Torture and Tragedy According to official statements, Roshchyna died on September 19, 2024, during a transfer to Moscow, allegedly as part of a prisoner exchange. But the circumstances of her death—and the condition of her body—told a far more disturbing story. Her remains were returned to Ukraine months later, mislabelled as those of an “unidentified male.” Forensic experts discovered her body bore signs of extreme torture: broken bones, electrocution marks, and the removal of her eyes, brain, and larynx—presumably to hide evidence of how she died. She had been held in Penal Colony No. 77 in Berdiansk, and later transferred to SIZO-2, the notorious pre-trial detention centre in Taganrog. Investigations by human rights groups have linked both sites to systemic torture, starvation, and abuse of Ukrainian detainees. A Chilling Pattern Roshchyna’s death fits a grim pattern of violence against journalists in occupied Ukraine. Her case is a searing indictment of how the Kremlin seeks not only to suppress information—but to punish those brave enough to uncover it. Her story also speaks to a broader crisis: the dangers facing reporters who challenge authoritarian narratives, especially women. Despite the personal risk, Roshchyna refused to be silenced. And for that, she paid the ultimate price. Remembering Victoria Tributes have poured in from around the world, honouring Roshchyna as a symbol of fearless journalism. But perhaps the most enduring tribute is the legacy of her reporting—accounts that give voice to civilians under occupation, to families ripped apart, and to lives lived under threat. Her colleagues remember her as warm, sharp-witted, and deeply committed to the truth. “She wanted to show the human face of war,” one wrote. “And she never stopped trying.” In remembering Victoria Roshchyna, we are reminded of the essential—and dangerous—role of journalism in conflict. Her story must not be forgotten. Her work must continue. Citations and Sources The Guardian  – ‘Numerous signs of torture’: a Ukrainian journalist's detention and death in Russian prison https:// www.theguardian.com/world/2025/apr/29/viktoriia-roshchyna-ukrainian-journalist-death-russian-prison The Washington Post  – Russia’s detention of civilians: secret prisons and torture https:// www.washingtonpost.com/world/interactive/2025/russia-detention-ukraine-civilians-occupation Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty (RFE/RL)  – Ukrainian Journalist Missing In Russian-Occupied Area Has Been Detained, Relatives Say https:// www.rferl.org/a/ukrainian-journalist-roshchyna-missing-russia-detention/ Hromadske International  – Victoria Roshchyna’s First-Person Account of Her 2022 Detention https:// en.hromadske.ua/posts/journalist-victoria-roshchyna-released-from-captivity International Women’s Media Foundation (IWMF)  – Courage in Journalism Award: Victoria Roshchyna (2022) https://www.iwmf.org/community/victoria-roshchyna/ New York Post  – Body of Ukrainian journalist returned with signs of torture https:// nypost.com/2025/04/29/world-news/body-of-ukrainian-journalist-kidnapped-by-russia-returned-with-eyes-brain-removed-likely-to-hide-signs-of-torture-report

The once-mighty co-producer of The Matrix , Joker , and Mad Max: Fury Road  has hit a critical crossroads. In March, Village Roadshow Entertainment Group (VREG) , the U.S. arm of the iconic Australian brand, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection , citing nearly $400 million in secured debt . This event marks a pivotal moment for the global film industry, where shifting models, legal disputes, and post-pandemic economics are converging in disruptive ways. While Village Roadshow’s Australian operations — including its studio, cinema, and theme park divisions — remain stable, the collapse of its American entertainment group raises pressing questions about the future of film financing, content ownership, and production geography . The repercussions are likely to extend beyond the company itself, affecting studios, investors, talent, and streaming platforms. Who Is Village Roadshow? A Legacy of Entertainment Founded in 1954 in Melbourne  by Roc Kirby, Village Roadshow began as a suburban drive-in cinema operator and evolved into one of Australia’s largest entertainment conglomerates . The name became synonymous with cinema culture across the country and, later, with Hollywood-level film production. Expansion into Global Film Production In the 1990s and early 2000s, Village Roadshow established Village Roadshow Pictures , headquartered in Los Angeles. The company entered a long-standing co-financing relationship with Warner Bros. , helping bankroll a string of major commercial and critical hits. Key productions include: The Matrix  trilogy and The Matrix Resurrections Joker  (2019) Ocean’s Eleven  and its sequels American Sniper Mad Max: Fury Road Sherlock Holmes  (Robert Downey Jr. series) Ready Player One Edge of Tomorrow The Lego Movie This co-financing model allowed studios to reduce risk while giving Village Roadshow a lucrative stake in high-performing properties. At its height, Village Roadshow Pictures helped raise billions of dollars in private equity and debt financing , aligning Wall Street capital with Hollywood creativity. What Went Wrong? VREG’s bankruptcy filing in Delaware outlines $393 million in secured debt  and reveals the fallout of years of shifting strategies and legal turmoil. 1. Legal Battles with Warner Bros. In 2022, Village Roadshow filed a high-profile lawsuit against Warner Bros., claiming that the simultaneous release of The Matrix Resurrections  in theatres and on HBO Max violated their contract. They argued that the move deliberately undermined box office revenue and devalued the IP. The lawsuit reportedly cost over $18 million in legal fees , draining resources with a limited return. 2. Unsuccessful Diversification After a change in leadership and investor pressure, VREG expanded into independent film and TV production , moving away from its historic studio-aligned model. However, the returns on these projects failed to match expectations. As the market tilted further toward streaming dominance, the company struggled to secure distribution and capital. 3. The Post-COVID Industry Reset The broader film industry continues to recover from the pandemic-induced collapse of theatrical exhibition . With fewer high-budget projects being greenlit and a saturated streaming market, independent co-financiers like VREG have found themselves squeezed between risk-averse studios and demanding capital markets. Australian Operations: Stable, but Splitting Importantly, Village Roadshow’s Australian business is not part of the bankruptcy proceedings . Now under the control of private equity firm Bain Capital, the Australian division includes: Village Roadshow Studios  (Queensland), one of the top film production facilities in the Southern Hemisphere. Theme Parks  including Warner Bros. Movie World, Sea World, and Wet’n’Wild. Village Cinemas , a major theatre operator across Australia. The Australian business has revoked VREG’s licence to use the “Village Roadshow” name , effectively creating a branding and operational divorce  between the two entities. Australian CEO Clark Kirby emphasised the company’s independence, citing profitability and a strong production pipeline, including: A new Monsterverse  film, injecting $93 million  into the local economy. A live-action Voltron  adaptation starring Henry Cavill , with a projected $100 million+  spend in Queensland. What This Means for the Industry The collapse of VREG is more than the downfall of a single co-producer — it signals deeper changes in how film and television content is financed, produced, and controlled. 1. The Death of the Co-Financing Era? Village Roadshow was one of the last major players in the co-financing model , a structure that allowed outside investors to share in the upside of blockbuster filmmaking. As studios consolidate (e.g. Warner Bros. Discovery, Disney-Fox) and pivot to in-house streaming content, external financiers are being squeezed out. This bankruptcy may signal the end of an era where companies like VREG played a vital supporting role in tentpole cinema. The risks are higher, the margins lower, and legal complications around distribution are more complex in a post-streaming world. 2. Back Catalogue Wars Village Roadshow's bankruptcy filing includes plans to sell its film library , comprising 108 titles  that generate around $50 million in annual income . If acquired by a firm like Content Partners, the rights to iconic films may be broken up, restructured, or withheld from public platforms . This could complicate availability for streaming services, international licensing deals, and even the development of sequels or remakes. For audiences and creatives alike, the fragmentation of IP ownership  represents a growing obstacle to cohesive storytelling across platforms. 3. Australia’s Rise as a Production Hub While VREG falters, Australia is gaining ground  as a global production location. Tax incentives, world-class facilities, and pandemic-era reliability have drawn productions from Netflix, Warner Bros., and Disney. Village Roadshow Studios alone has hosted major projects including: Elvis  (Baz Luhrmann) Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Men Tell No Tales Aquaman This trend may accelerate as international producers seek stable, cost-effective locations outside the U.S. and UK. Australia could emerge as a geopolitical counterweight to Hollywood , particularly in Asia-Pacific content strategies. 4. A Legal Precedent in the Streaming Wars The Matrix Resurrections  lawsuit foreshadowed a broader reckoning over day-and-date releases . Studios, investors, and talent agents now insist on clearer contractual protections around streaming distribution. Future financing agreements may need to explicitly account for digital release strategies , backend deals, and windowing rights, or risk collapse. A Turning Point for Global Entertainment Village Roadshow’s financial unravelling is not an isolated event — it is a symptom of a deeper transformation in the film and television business. The collapse of a major co-financing pillar exposes the fragile economics behind even the most beloved blockbusters. At the same time, it offers opportunities for production hubs like Australia to redefine where — and how — global content is made. As the industry reorients around streaming, IP control, and international expansion, the legacy of Village Roadshow serves as both a cautionary tale and a blueprint for the next generation of media companies.

Laptop with graphs Google Ads is one of the most powerful tools available for businesses aiming to grow online. Whether you want to drive more website traffic, increase sales, or generate local enquiries, Google Ads offers a flexible, fast, and measurable way to reach your audience. In this article, we’ll cover the essentials: what Google Ads is, how it works, why it’s valuable, and a few basics to help you get started. What is Google Ads? Google Ads (formerly Google AdWords) is an online advertising platform where businesses pay to display adverts across Google's vast network — including the search engine, YouTube, Google Maps, and millions of partner websites. The most common types of adverts are: Search Ads: Text adverts that appear when users search for specific keywords on Google. Display Ads: Visual adverts shown on websites within Google's Display Network. Video Ads: Short promotional videos displayed on YouTube. Shopping Ads: Product listings shown directly in Google search results. How Google Ads Works At its core, Google Ads operates on a pay-per-click (PPC) model. You bid on keywords you want your adverts to appear for. When someone searches for that keyword, Google runs a rapid auction to decide which adverts are shown and in what order. Several factors determine whether your advert appears: Bid Amount: How much you are willing to pay for a click. Quality Score: Google’s assessment of your advert’s relevance and user experience. Ad Rank: A combination of your bid and Quality Score that determines your advert's position. You only pay when someone clicks on your advert (or takes another action you have defined, such as calling your business). Why Use Google Ads? Immediate Visibility: Appear at the top of search results quickly — ideal for new businesses. Highly Targeted Reach: Advertise to specific locations, devices, times of day, and customer interests. Flexible Budgets: Spend as little or as much as you wish. You control your daily budget. Measurable Results: Track exactly how many clicks, calls, sales, or sign-ups your adverts generate. Scalable Growth: Start small, test your adverts, and expand your campaigns as you find what works. Basic Steps to Get Started Set Your Goal: What do you want to achieve? More calls, website visits, online purchases? Choose Your Campaign Type: Search, Display, Video, Shopping, or Smart campaigns. Pick Your Audience: Define your location, language, device targeting, and demographics. Select Keywords: Choose the words and phrases your customers are likely to search for. Write Your Adverts: Create compelling and relevant text or visuals. Set Your Budget and Bidding Strategy: Decide how much you are willing to spend. Launch and Monitor: Go live and track performance, making improvements as needed. Tips for Beginners Start small: Run a few adverts with a modest budget to familiarise yourself with the system. Focus on relevance: Ensure your adverts closely match what users are searching for. Use negative keywords: Prevent your adverts from appearing for irrelevant searches. Track conversions: Set up conversion tracking to measure actual business results, not just clicks. Review and optimise regularly: Monitor performance and make adjustments to adverts, keywords, and bids. Final Thoughts Google Ads can be a game changer for businesses of all sizes. However, success does not happen automatically — it requires careful planning, smart targeting, and ongoing optimisation. When used properly, Google Ads can deliver more leads, more customers, and genuine business growth. If you are new to Google Ads, start with a small trial campaign, monitor it closely, and scale as you learn what works. Mastering Google Ads could very well become one of the best investments you make in your business.

the klop end of anfield stadium On an evening stitched into the grand tapestry of Anfield history, Liverpool stood once more at the summit of English football. The night was more than just a coronation; it was a love letter, a requiem for the past and a triumphant overture for a future reborn. This was not merely a title win. It was Liverpool’s 20th English championship — an exalted milestone that sees them stride shoulder-to-shoulder with their eternal rivals, Manchester United, atop the pantheon of the English game. For a club whose very identity is carved from history and pride, parity at last has the feeling of destiny fulfilled. And how poignant, how achingly beautiful, that it came with their people. Five years ago, the pandemic had stolen from Liverpool the communal ecstasy of their first Premier League crown. In 2025, no such cruel fate intervened. Anfield throbbed, pulsed, sang as one; banners wept colour and song spilled into the Mersey air. This was a title cradled not in silence but lifted aloft on a chorus of hearts. The final act was devastating in its certainty. Tottenham drew first blood, but Liverpool, stirred by history and driven by new dreams, responded with thunderous grace. Luis Díaz, Alexis Mac Allister, Cody Gakpo — each name a stanza in a poem of redemption. Mohamed Salah, king of this new court, crowned the evening not just with a goal, but with the burden and brilliance of his 28th of the season. And who would have dared to script this? A new figurehead on the touchline, Arne Slot, in his maiden voyage across England's stormy seas, guiding Liverpool with poise and precision. In an age of dizzying transfer fees and fevered expectation, Slot’s side achieved immortality not through gaudy spending but through belief, unity, and a football so vivid it seared itself into the soul. This was not victory born of money, but of memory — a triumph wrought from the relentless spirit that draped the Kop in scarves and song for generations. It was as if Shankly, Paisley, and Dalglish whispered from the shadows, urging them forward. Come May 26th, Liverpool will parade their prize before a city that has waited not five years, but five decades for a night like this — a night when history does not weigh heavy, but dances light upon red shoulders.

Facebook Marketplace has become a go-to platform for buying and selling items locally. With millions of users and a wide range of listings, it's easy to see why people turn to it instead of traditional selling platforms. But like anything, it has its ups and downs. Here's a breakdown of the pros and cons from both a seller’s and buyer’s point of view. Pros for Sellers 1. It’s Free to Use Unlike some other platforms, Facebook Marketplace doesn’t charge listing fees or take a cut from your sales, making it a great option for casual sellers. 2. Local Audience Because it connects you with people in your area, it’s easier to sell items quickly without the hassle of shipping. 3. Quick and Easy Listings You can post an item in just a few minutes, complete with photos, descriptions, and pricing. 4. Wide Reach With so many people using Facebook daily, your items can get a lot of visibility quickly. Cons for Sellers 1. Scams and Fake Buyers Scams are common. From fake payment screenshots to phishing links, sellers need to stay alert. 2. Unreliable Buyers People may agree to buy something and never show up, or they might go quiet after expressing interest. 3. Haggling and Low Offers You’ll often get offers far below your asking price, even when you’ve already priced your item fairly. 4. No Guarantees or Support If something goes wrong, Facebook support can be difficult to reach and offers limited resolution tools. Pros for Buyers 1. Affordable Prices Many items are secondhand and priced to sell quickly, which means you can snag some serious bargains. 2. No Shipping Fees Because most items are picked up locally, you don’t have to worry about paying for shipping. 3. Useful for Everyday Items From furniture to electronics to kids’ toys, Marketplace can be a goldmine for practical purchases. 4. Easy Communication You can message sellers directly through Facebook, making the buying process simple and fast. Cons for Buyers 1. Risk of Scams Just like sellers, buyers need to be cautious of scams, such as fake products or misleading listings. 2. Unresponsive Sellers Some sellers post items and then disappear, or they don’t respond to questions. 3. No shows Buyers can waste time arranging a meetup only for the seller to cancel last-minute or not show up at all. 4. Lack of Buyer Protection Unlike platforms like eBay or Amazon, there’s very little recourse if you buy something and it turns out to be faulty or different from what was advertised. Final Thoughts on Facebook Marketplace Facebook Marketplace can be a great tool whether you're trying to make some quick cash or find a good deal. It’s convenient, easy to use, and cost effective, but it’s not without its flaws. Whether you're buying or selling, always stay cautious, meet in safe locations, and trust your gut. With the right approach, Facebook Marketplace can be both a practical and rewarding experience.

Cheers and Chants, Boos and Tweets: The Verdict is In WrestleMania 41 came, saw, and - depending on who you ask - either conquered expectations or crumbled beneath the weight of its own spectacle. Image of Wresltemania 32 by Miguel Discart from Bruxelles, Belgique Fans around the world were quick to voice their thoughts, and they weren't shy about it. Social media was ablaze the moment the lights dimmed in Las Vegas' Allegiant Stadium. From historic highs like John Cena’s record-breaking win to eyebrow-raising absences (we're looking at you, Rock), the WWE Universe had plenty to celebrate - and criticise. Some called it the most emotionally charged 'Mania in years, others dubbed it overbooked chaos wrapped in celebrity fluff. Either way, WrestleMania did what it always does: dominate the cultural conversation. What Is WrestleMania, Anyway? Photo by Diego Serrano WrestleMania isn’t just a wrestling event - it’s the wrestling event. Dubbed the “Grandest Stage of Them All,” it’s WWE’s annual Super Bowl, Oscars, and rock concert rolled into one. Since its debut in 1985, WrestleMania has been the launchpad for legends, dream matches, and moments that define eras. Who can forget Hulk Hogan slamming Andre the Giant at WrestleMania III? Or Shawn Michaels' emotional farewell at XXVI? More recently, Sasha Banks and Bianca Belair made history in 2021, lit up the world with representation and power. In essence, WrestleMania is where the myths of pro wrestling are born. WrestleMania 41: The Good, the Bad, and the Confusing The Good? John Cena’s 17th World Championship had the crowd exploding. History was made, and even sceptics had to admit - it was a goosebumps moment. CM Punk’s return to the WrestleMania main event, complete with tears backstage and emotional callbacks, reminded fans why he’s one of the most compelling figures in wrestling. Dominik Mysterio unexpectedly won fans over with his Intercontinental Title victory - perhaps turning a new page with the WWE Universe. And perhaps the biggest surprise of all: TNA World Champion Joe Hendry making his WrestleMania debut against Randy Orton . While the match was relatively short, it became one of the most talked-about moments of the night. The crowd sang Hendry’s entrance theme in full twice, and the "Say His Name and He Appears" catchphrase rang through the stadium like a battle cry. Hendry lost the match to Orton, but it hardly mattered. In that moment, he arrived. The crossover moment was unexpected, refreshing, and hinted at WWE’s increasingly open door to the wider wrestling world. The Bad? Matches like Jey Uso vs. Gunther felt rushed and disjointed, leaving fans scratching their heads. Becky Lynch’s surprise tag title win (replacing Bayley last-minute) drew ire from fans who saw it as behind-the-scenes politicking. Travis Scott’s heavy involvement in the event’s climax had some fans wondering if the show had veered too far into pop culture stunt casting. But all of this paled in comparison to the elephant in the ring... Where Was The Rock? Heading into WrestleMania 41, the anticipation of a clash-or at least an appearance-from Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson had been built up for months. From his involvement in earlier segments, to backstage teases, to his apparent alignment with The Bloodline… fans were ready. The table was set. Then he didn’t show. The reaction? Volcanic. On Twitter (now "X"), #WhereIsTheRock trended before the show even ended. Fans speculated everything from creative disputes to last-minute schedule conflicts. Some believed The Rock opted out to allow Cena the spotlight, as later confirmed in interviews, but that explanation didn’t sit well with many who had bought into the storylines building to a showdown. More than just a missed cameo, The Rock’s absence left a gaping hole in the narrative. Story arcs were left dangling, tensions unresolved. And while Cena’s record-breaking moment was monumental, a large segment of the audience couldn’t shake the feeling of what could have been. Fan Voices: Mixed But Passionate “Cena breaking Flair’s record was incredible. But The Rock going ghost? It’s like watching Avengers: Endgame without Iron Man.” — @HeelTurnTim “WrestleMania is about moments, and this one had a few. But it also had a few missed ones that sting more than they should.” — Reddit user ‘SuplexSavage’ “Punk crying backstage, Cena rewriting history… yeah, I’ll remember this one for a while. Just wish The Rock hadn’t vanished.” — @WrestleMama “Joe Hendry at WrestleMania singing with the crowd? I didn’t have that on my 2025 bingo card. TNA just got a whole lot more eyes on them.” — @VoiceOfKayfabe Final Bell: Legacy in the Balance WrestleMania 41 will be remembered - no question about it. Whether as a triumphant milestone or a missed opportunity depends on where you were sitting, and maybe who your favourite is. It was a reminder that pro wrestling isn’t just about who wins the match, but who shows up at all. And next year? Well, let’s just say fans will be watching the horizon for one very famous eyebrow to finally raise again.