Search Results

The UK’s new Online Safety Act has introduced sweeping age verification rules for a wide range of digital services. From social media platforms to music streaming apps, users now face requests to prove their age through ID uploads, facial scans or other forms of verification. The majority of these checks are being handled by specialist third-party companies, often based overseas. They act as intermediaries, confirming whether a user is old enough to access certain content. In many cases, they do not share the full ID with the platform, instead sending back a simple “pass” or “fail”. How the system works Under the new law, platforms must ensure that children cannot access content deemed harmful. That includes explicit music lyrics, violent games, pornography, gambling, and online discussions of subjects such as eating disorders or suicide. To meet this “highly effective” requirement, most companies have opted not to build their own systems. Instead they have signed contracts with external providers such as Yoti, Persona and Kids Web Services. These services use techniques like: Scanning an official document such as a passport or driving licence. Estimating a user’s age through a selfie analysed by AI. Linking to government databases or credit card checks. Some verification companies promise to delete personal data within days. Others may retain information for months or years, raising concerns among privacy advocates. Critics point out that once this infrastructure is in place, it could, in theory, be used for purposes beyond child safety. MPs’ VPN expenses draw attention While the public adjusts to this new reality, attention has turned to how some politicians manage their own online access. A POLITICO  review of parliamentary expenses found that several MPs, including Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds, claimed subscriptions for virtual private networks (VPNs). Reynolds expensed a two-year NordVPN subscription in April 2024. Other MPs, such as Labour’s Sarah Champion and Alex Sobel, and Conservative MPs Gareth Davies and Chris Heaton-Harris, have also claimed for VPN services. VPNs encrypt internet traffic and can hide a user’s location, making them harder to track. They are often used by businesses and journalists to protect sensitive information. However, they can also bypass regional restrictions, including those imposed by age-verification systems. The revelation has sparked criticism online, with some pointing out the apparent contradiction between MPs approving legislation that pushes the public into using third-party age checks while themselves claiming tools that can avoid such checks. What it means for ordinary users For people who rarely think about online privacy, the combination of mandatory age verification and rising VPN usage can seem confusing. In practical terms, the new rules could mean: You may need to upload official documents or scan your face to access websites you have used freely for years. Your personal data may be handled by a company you have never heard of and which may be outside the UK. Content you regard as harmless could still be blocked unless you verify your age. Some smaller websites may block UK visitors altogether rather than invest in compliance systems. Meanwhile, VPNs remain legal in the UK, but their usage is being monitored more closely. Providers have reported sharp rises in new subscriptions since the age verification rules came into effect. Privacy campaigners warn that this creates a two-tier internet where tech-savvy or wealthier users can pay for workarounds while others cannot. The bigger picture Supporters of the law, including many parents’ groups, argue that the measures are long overdue to protect children in an increasingly digital world. The government insists that the age checks are proportionate and that privacy is being respected. Opponents counter that the approach is heavy-handed, ineffective against determined users, and potentially damaging to free expression. They also highlight that the involvement of overseas verification companies gives the UK little control over how data is stored or processed. As the Online Safety Act’s child safety duties become fully enforceable, the divide between public compliance and private circumvention may continue to grow. The irony that some MPs are expensing VPNs while the public is told to trust age-checking systems has not been lost on critics. For the average person, the choice is stark. Accept a new layer of ID checks to keep using familiar online services, or follow the lead of some elected representatives and invest in a VPN — with all the technical know-how and potential legal scrutiny that entails.

Once again, Meta is in the spotlight, and not for the reasons it might hope. This time, it finds itself under renewed legal and regulatory scrutiny across both the UK and United States, as fresh allegations emerge about its continued tracking of user data without full consent. Despite previous fines and public outcry, the tech giant behind Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp is facing a storm that may be more difficult to weather. New Legal Pressure in the United States In the US, Meta is currently facing multiple class action lawsuits, many of which revolve around privacy breaches, exploitative platform design, and the targeting of young users. One of the most prominent ongoing cases was filed in 2023 by dozens of US states. The lawsuit accuses Meta of deliberately designing features on Instagram and Facebook that exploit young users' psychological vulnerabilities, encouraging addictive use of the platforms. The company is alleged to have known about the harm these features could cause, particularly to teenage mental health, but did little to change the design. Another class action is gaining traction over the unauthorised tracking of user behaviour on third-party websites. This includes the alleged misuse of tracking pixels to collect data even when users are not logged into Meta’s platforms. Users claim they were unaware that their health, financial, or browsing information was being collected in the background. These lawsuits follow in the wake of a $725 million settlement Meta agreed to pay in 2022 over the Cambridge Analytica scandal. The current cases suggest that regulatory and legal appetite for holding Big Tech accountable is only increasing. Investigations and Pressure in the UK Across the Atlantic, Meta is facing scrutiny from the UK’s Information Commissioner's Office (ICO). Though details of ongoing investigations remain confidential, the ICO has expressed growing concern about the use of data tracking in digital advertising. The regulator is reportedly investigating whether Meta’s ad targeting systems and platform architecture violate UK privacy laws, especially in light of recent Online Safety Act provisions. In addition, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has launched probes into how Meta collects and uses consumer data, particularly around its growing integration with virtual and augmented reality services. The UK’s appetite for action follows similar moves in the European Union. In 2023, Ireland’s Data Protection Commission issued Meta with a €1.2 billion fine for unlawful data transfers to the United States, the largest GDPR-related fine ever issued. A Pattern of Privacy Failures Meta’s defenders often argue that the company is simply evolving in a fast-moving tech environment. However, critics point to a repeated pattern of behaviour that undermines public trust. From Cambridge Analytica to hidden tracking pixels and now algorithms that allegedly harm young people, Meta’s record on user data is far from spotless. Regulators and campaigners say this pattern suggests systemic issues rather than one-off mistakes. James Steyer, CEO of Common Sense Media, said: "Tech giants like Meta have failed to put the wellbeing of users first. We have seen this time and again. Fines may not be enough to drive real change." What Could This Mean for Meta? The potential financial impact of these actions could be considerable. Under GDPR, fines can reach up to 4 percent of global turnover. With Meta reporting revenue of around $135 billion in 2024, this could mean penalties in the multi-billion range. Beyond the fines, Meta faces restrictions on how it can collect and use data. Some legal experts believe upcoming rulings may force the company to overhaul its ad systems entirely, particularly those built around inferred personal data and behavioural tracking. There is also reputational risk. Consumers, particularly younger ones, are increasingly conscious of how their data is handled. With rival platforms emerging and concerns around AI-generated content on the rise, Meta’s grip on digital culture may be slipping. Why It Matters to Everyone These legal actions may feel distant from everyday life, but they reflect a deeper issue about how much control individuals have over their digital lives. Most users never read the fine print or understand the scope of the data being collected. Meta’s platforms remain free to use, but the cost is increasingly paid in privacy. There is also a broader societal question at play. If companies continue to operate in a way that values data extraction over transparency, can regulation ever catch up? Or are we simply witnessing the beginning of a new kind of digital economy, one where personal information is the price of entry? A Familiar Story with Higher Stakes Whether this new wave of lawsuits and investigations leads to genuine change is yet to be seen. Meta has the resources to fight prolonged legal battles, and history has shown the company is rarely forced into long-term reform. But there is a sense that the tide is turning. Public sentiment is shifting, and regulators appear more coordinated than ever. If Meta is once again under fire for failing to respect data boundaries, this time it may find the consequences harder to brush off. Sources and Further Reading FTC vs Meta Lawsuit (USA) Meta $1.2B Fine – Irish DPC UK ICO Comments on Ad Tracking Common Sense Media: Youth Lawsuit Meta’s Cambridge Analytica Settlement

Following a busy and surprise-laden first night, WWE returned with the second chapter of its SummerSlam double-bill. The matches on Sunday delivered more stipulation-based brawls, intense title fights, and the most talked-about return of the weekend. Naomi (c) vs IYO SKY vs Rhea Ripley Women’s World Championship – Triple Threat Match Naomi entered SummerSlam as champion with momentum following her return to the spotlight earlier in the year. After turning heel during the build-up, she found herself in the crosshairs of two of WWE’s most dangerous women: the acrobatic IYO SKY and the returning powerhouse Rhea Ripley. The triple threat format allowed for creative spots, with SKY using ladders and springboards to her advantage, while Ripley dominated with hard-hitting offence. Naomi, however, worked opportunistically, targeting whichever woman was isolated. In the final moments, Ripley hit Riptide on SKY but was thrown out of the ring by Naomi, who swooped in to steal the pin. The finish sparked crowd boos, reinforcing Naomi’s new villainous persona. Winner and Still Champion : Naomi Becky Lynch (c) vs Lyra Valkyria Women’s Intercontinental Championship – No Disqualification, Last Chance Stipulation The feud between Becky Lynch and Lyra Valkyria had been simmering since Valkyria’s rapid rise through the women's ranks. This match came with high stakes—if Lyra failed to win, she could never challenge for the title again during Becky’s reign. Both women brought passion and intensity to the no-disqualification rules. Steel chairs, kendo sticks, and even a table were used liberally. At one point, Valkyria landed a moonsault through a table, nearly securing a pin. Becky’s veteran savvy paid off in the end. She dodged a high-risk top-rope move and locked in the Dis-Arm-Her with a chair wrapped around Valkyria’s arm. With nowhere to go, Lyra tapped out. Winner and Still Champion : Becky Lynch Solo Sikoa (c) vs Jacob Fatu United States Championship – Steel Cage Match This was the most brutal match of the night. Solo Sikoa, now firmly established as the violent centre of the post-Bloodline landscape, defended against the explosive and unpredictable Jacob Fatu. The cage added an extra layer of carnage. The match was less about finesse and more about destruction. Both men slammed each other into the steel repeatedly. Fatu attempted to escape mid-match but was dragged back in for a superkick followed by a Samoan Spike. Despite a late comeback from Fatu that included a top-rope splash, Sikoa kicked out and used the cage to trap Fatu's arm. A second Samoan Spike sealed the win. Winner and Still Champion : Solo Sikoa Dominik Mysterio (c) vs AJ Styles Intercontinental Championship Dominik Mysterio’s controversial title reign had seen him escape with the belt repeatedly, often due to outside interference. This match, however, was a straight one-on-one against AJ Styles, who returned from injury looking to remind fans he was still a world-class performer. Styles controlled the early stages with technical precision, grounding Dominik and teasing a submission finish. Dominik turned the tide with a thumb to the eye and a snap DDT, then used the ropes for leverage during a near-fall that had the crowd furious. Styles mounted a final flurry, hitting the Phenomenal Forearm. But Dominik rolled out of the ring, pulled Styles into the steel steps, and finished with a Frog Splash after slipping back into the ring unnoticed. Winner and Still Champion : Dominik Mysterio The Wyatt Sicks vs Fraxiom, Andrade & Rey Fénix, Motor City Machine Guns, #DIY, Street Profits Six-Team TLC Match – WWE Tag Team Championship This chaotic, high-risk encounter featured six teams and the return of the Tables, Ladders, and Chairs stipulation. It was the most action-packed match of the night, full of wild dives, broken furniture, and blink-and-you-miss-it moments. The Wyatt Sicks, introduced earlier in the summer as a new horror-themed faction, were not favourites going in. But their dark presence dominated the match, with Bo Dallas (as Uncle Howdy) using psychological tactics and brawling style to throw off the competition. Highlights included a triple ladder suplex spot involving Fraxiom and DIY, a Spanish Fly from the top of a ladder by Rey Fénix, and a spear through a table by Montez Ford. The ending saw the Wyatt Sicks’ tag members climb opposite ladders and simultaneously unhook both belts after incapacitating the Machine Guns with chair shots. Winners and New Champions : The Wyatt Sicks John Cena (c) vs Cody Rhodes Undisputed WWE Championship – Street Fight In a rematch from Money in the Bank, John Cena entered as champion and icon, while Cody Rhodes carried the weight of legacy and expectation. Their previous encounter had been clean and respectful, but this time the gloves were off. Both men used the street fight stipulation to full effect—trash cans, steel steps, kendo sticks, and even the commentary desk came into play. Cena delivered a brutal Attitude Adjustment through the announce table. Rhodes responded with a Cody Cutter from the barricade. The decisive moment came when Cena tried to lock in the STF with a chain. Cody slipped out, landed three Cross Rhodes in a row, and pinned Cena to reclaim the title. After the match, the lights cut out. To the shock of everyone, Brock Lesnar  returned, stormed the ring, and dropped Cena with an F5. The move wasn’t part of the match, but it was a clear message. Whether it was revenge, a statement, or both, Lesnar’s presence changed the entire feel of the show’s final moments. Winner and New Champion : Cody Rhodes Location: MetLife Stadium, New Jersey Date: Sunday, August 3, 2025 Attendance: Combined weekend crowd estimated over 140,000 Host: Cardi B While Night One featured title changes and twists, Night Two upped the physicality and chaos. From the carnage of the steel cage and TLC bouts to Lesnar’s surprise return, the second half of SummerSlam 2025 delivered high-impact entertainment and launched several new storylines heading into the autumn. Cody Rhodes reclaimed gold, the Wyatt Sicks made their mark, and Naomi’s championship run continued. WWE’s two-night experiment gave room for a wide range of talent to shine and left fans talking well beyond the final bell.

SummerSlam returned in 2025 with a bold shift in format. For the first time in its long history, WWE's summer classic spanned two nights. Night One delivered a mix of storytelling, athleticism, and surprises, as rising stars met seasoned veterans in a card that set the tone for the weekend. Roman Reigns & Jey Uso vs Bron Breakker & Bronson Reed Roman Reigns, who had been off television since his WrestleMania defeat earlier in the year, made a dramatic return to tag with his cousin Jey Uso. The Bloodline's future has been uncertain since internal splits began in 2023, and this match marked the first time Reigns and Uso had teamed up since their highly publicised feud. Bron Breakker and Bronson Reed, two of WWE's strongest powerhouse competitors, controlled the early stages. Their size and raw aggression made them difficult to counter, but the Reigns-Uso pairing brought familiarity and resilience. The turning point came when Breakker set up for a spear on Jey. Reigns intervened, taking the brunt of the move to protect his cousin. The moment felt symbolic, possibly hinting at a more honourable Reigns going forward. Jey capitalised with a Superkick and a splash for the win. Winners : Roman Reigns & Jey Uso Charlotte Flair & Alexa Bliss vs Raquel Rodriguez & Roxanne Perez Women’s Tag Team Championship This match marked the surprise formation of a new alliance between Charlotte Flair and Alexa Bliss. Flair had been chasing a record-breaking tag title run, while Bliss had returned from maternity leave earlier in the year with a more aggressive in-ring persona. Raquel Rodriguez and Roxanne Perez entered as champions, combining strength and speed. They looked well-matched on paper, but cracks began to show mid-match when communication broke down between the two. Flair hit a Natural Selection on Perez after Bliss took Rodriguez out with a DDT on the floor. With Perez isolated, Bliss landed Sister Abigail and covered her for the pin. Winners and New Champions : Charlotte Flair & Alexa Bliss Logan Paul & Drew McIntyre vs Randy Orton & Jelly Roll In one of the night's more unpredictable attractions, internet star Logan Paul teamed up with Drew McIntyre to face the veteran Randy Orton and country singer Jelly Roll, making his in-ring debut. While many fans assumed Jelly Roll would serve as comic relief, the musician held his own surprisingly well, even landing a solid elbow drop and a spinebuster with Orton’s guidance. However, inexperience caught up with him. After a missed tag attempt and a cheap shot from Paul behind the referee’s back, McIntyre landed a Claymore on Orton, knocking him out of the ring. Paul then pinned Jelly Roll after a springboard lariat. Winners : Logan Paul & Drew McIntyre Sami Zayn vs Karrion Kross Sami Zayn has been teetering on the edge of a character shift for months. His promos have hinted at internal conflict, and this match against Kross, a brutal and psychologically intense performer, felt like a crossroads moment. Kross dominated the first half of the bout, grinding Zayn down with methodical holds and repeated suplexes. Scarlett’s presence at ringside added an uneasy tension, but Zayn began to rally with a series of dives and a Blue Thunder Bomb. The ending came as Zayn resisted the temptation to use a steel chair introduced by Scarlett. He instead countered Kross’s finisher with a Helluva Kick and scored the pin. The crowd appreciated the show of honour, but there was still an uneasy undertone to Zayn’s demeanour. Winner : Sami Zayn Tiffany Stratton (c) vs Jade Cargill WWE Women’s Championship This was a battle of athleticism and ego. Tiffany Stratton, the self-described "centre of the universe," defended against the physically dominant Jade Cargill, who had arrived in WWE with major buzz following her time in AEW. Cargill’s strength overwhelmed Stratton in the early minutes, with a series of deadlifts and press slams. But Stratton showcased her experience, targeting Cargill’s legs and slowing the pace with technical submissions. The match concluded with Stratton slipping out of Jaded and landing her Prettiest Moonsault Ever, a triple jump moonsault, to retain her title in decisive fashion. Winner and Still Champion : Tiffany Stratton Gunther (c) vs CM Punk World Heavyweight Championship Gunther had held the World Heavyweight Championship for nearly a year, bringing a sense of legitimacy and brutality to the belt. CM Punk, returning to main event form after months of injury and controversy, stepped up as challenger in what was billed as a clash of philosophies: discipline versus defiance. The match was slow-building but intense. Gunther’s powerful chops and suplexes wore Punk down, while Punk countered with submission attempts and gritty determination. Punk managed to roll out of a powerbomb attempt and locked in the Anaconda Vise. Gunther nearly reached the ropes but eventually tapped, ending his title reign. Just as Punk began to celebrate, Seth Rollins’ music hit . Limping down the ramp on crutches, Rollins revealed he was faking the injury, cashed in his Money in the Bank contract, and hit a Stomp on Punk as the referee rang the bell. Three seconds later, Rollins was the new World Heavyweight Champion. Winner : CM Punk New Champion (via Cash-In) : Seth Rollins Location : MetLife Stadium, New Jersey Date : Saturday, August 2, 2025 Attendance : Over 70,000 Host : Cardi B SummerSlam’s first night combined emotional beats with fast-paced action. Reigns’ return, Rollins’ shock cash-in, and Stratton’s successful title defence were among the highlights. While not every bout was a show-stealer, the groundwork laid here added depth and anticipation for Night Two.

For many in the UK, loneliness is no longer just a private struggle—it has become a public crisis. Understanding Loneliness in Britain Office for National Statistics (ONS) data shows that between November 2022 and February 2023, about 7.08% of people  reported feeling lonely often or always. That adds up to roughly 3.7 million people  across Great Britain. A decade ago, that number stood at just 5%. Younger people bear the burden more heavily. Adults aged 16–29 are over twice as likely  to report chronic loneliness than those over 70. In fact, nearly half of UK women aged 18–24 say they feel lonely some or all of the time. Why the Spike? Pandemic After‑Effects and Remote Work Although lockdowns may be over, questions remain. Many people, especially young adults, are struggling to rebuild social confidence or rebuild connections. A sense of isolation lingers, even where opportunities now exist. At the same time, remote working has reduced daily social contact. One study found that 67% of telecommuters  reported feeling lonely—compared to none of those working from an office. Meanwhile, workplace loneliness costs the UK economy around £2.5 billion a year , due to reduced productivity and higher turnover. Urban Life and Mobility Large cities, especially London, demonstrate a paradox: more people yet less rootedness. High living costs and frequent relocation make it harder to form friendships. Reddit users in London describe moves every few years, making long‑term relationships nearly impossible. The Real Cost of Loneliness Health & Wellbeing Loneliness does more than hurt emotionally. Research indicates: A 26% higher risk  of premature death A 30% increase  in risk of heart disease or stroke A 50% greater chance  of developing dementia in older adults. Nearly 62% of chronically lonely young adults  report losing self-confidence, and almost half say loneliness has dampened their ambition at work . Social & Economic Impact Loneliness is not evenly distributed. Charities like Marmalade Trust and the Campaign to End Loneliness note that: Around 940,000 older people  in the UK often feel lonely 270,000 people aged 65+  go a week without speaking to anyone Older carers and those with health issues face compounded isolation Not Just Talking, But Practising Connection Public Awareness and Stigma Reduction Despite high rates of loneliness, over 56% of Brits  say they are reluctant to discuss it due to shame or vulnerability fears . Nearly one in ten adults  is thought to have no close friends at all. Community Initiatives Britain led the world by appointing a Minister for Loneliness and launching a national strategy in 2018. Community-led efforts have followed: The Chatty Café Scheme , which marks tables where strangers are encouraged to talk, now spans over 1,400 venues . Lonely Girls Club , founded in London in 2018, reached over 93,000 members across UK cities, hosting social events and shared experiences. The Silver Line , a telephone helpline for older people, handles thousands of weekly calls—many first-time callers reaching out for human contact. Age UK warns that if loneliness is not addressed, 1.2 million older adults  in England could feel lonely by 2034. Are We Just Talking More? Some of the rise in reported loneliness reflects changing norms. As stigma falls, people are more willing to say how they feel. Experts caution this doesn’t necessarily mean we are lonelier, but that we are more honest about it. Still, even when taking openness into account, current rates significantly exceed pre-pandemic levels and remain elevated. Potential Paths Forward Encouraging Real Connection Government support of social prescribing , where GPs refer lonely individuals to group activities or befriending schemes. Local investment in “third places”—cafes, clubs, libraries—to rebuild social infrastructures. Supporting initiatives like Chatty Cafés, friendship clubs, and intergenerational programmes. Workplaces Taking Action Employers are starting to embed social wellbeing into corporate culture and training for managers to recognise and address loneliness. Embracing and Valuing More Than Just Digital Connection Screen-time detox initiatives—such as Offline Club meet-ups or phone-free events—are gaining popularity in the UK and beyond. Platforms encouraging in-person connections—book clubs, walking groups, and community events—are helping people meet meaningfully offline. Loneliness in the UK is not increasing simply because people talk about it more. It is rising because societal patterns have shifted. From remote work and fragmented communities to urban roots that never take hold, many factors have deepened isolation. The rise in awareness is welcome, but awareness alone will not solve it. Rebuilding community, recognising loneliness as a public health issue, and creating spaces—both online and offline—where people can genuinely connect will matter more than ever. Because loneliness is not just sadness in solitude. It is the absence of belonging in a crowded world. Sources and Further Reading Campaign to End Loneliness – Facts and Statistics Campaign to End Loneliness – Younger Brits Report Higher Levels of Loneliness GOV.UK – Employers and Loneliness ITV News – Almost Half of Young Women Feel Lonely in the UK Age UK – Building on Success to Beat Loneliness Marmalade Trust – Loneliness Statistics Friendship Project – Loneliness Research The Silver Line – Supporting Older People The Chatty Café Scheme Lonely Girls Club Jo Cox Commission on Loneliness Time Magazine – How the World's First Loneliness Minister Will Tackle the Sad Reality of Modern Life The Sun – Over Half of Brits Feel Lonely but Are Ashamed to Admit It WIRED – Ditch Screens to End the Global Friendship Recession Reddit Thread – Moving Often in London Makes Friendships Difficult The Australian – The Epidemic of Loneliness Nobody Wants to Talk About

On a damp Thursday evening in Barnsley, a group of friends gather around a table at a dedicated wargaming club filled with laughter, dice rolls, and the comforting thud of cardboard game boards. Several streets away, a shop specialising in vinyl records is preparing for its busiest weekend of the year and in a nearby hobby shop, hobbyists paint miniature soldiers for a tabletop battle set in the distant future. None of it is digital, and none of it is accidental. A game of Terraforming Mars Across the UK and much of the world, there is a growing cultural shift. People are quietly turning away from screens and rediscovering the tactile joys of the physical world. Board games, vinyl records, typewriters, film cameras, and even wargaming are experiencing a boom. For many, this return to analogue is not about rejecting technology completely, but about regaining a sense of connection, community, and control. Rolling the Dice Again Board games are one of the clearest success stories of this analogue revival. Once dismissed as the preserve of children and rainy-day entertainment, modern board games are booming. Strategic, cooperative, competitive, and creative titles now line the shelves of dedicated board game cafés and independent shops. Global hits like Catan , Wingspan , and Ticket to Ride  have helped reshape the market, while indie publishers have brought fresh storytelling and art into play. In Germany, often considered the spiritual home of board games, more than 50 million are sold each year. In the UK, the market is growing by between 5 and 10 per cent annually. And crucially, it is not just families playing, it is adults in their twenties, thirties and forties, eager for face-to-face interaction after years of online-only living. "People are craving social experiences again," says Sarah, co-owner of a Leeds board game café. "You sit at a table with real people, make eye contact, laugh, and compete. You can't get that from a screen." Spinning Back to Vinyl Vinyl records, too, are having their moment. In 2024, vinyl sales in the UK reached over 6.7 million units, a level not seen in more than three decades. Gen Z, often thought of as digitally native, is leading much of the charge. Nearly 40 per cent of Gen Z adults say they have bought a vinyl record in the past year. For many, vinyl is not just about sound. It is about ritual, the physical act of placing a record on a turntable, flipping it halfway through, and admiring the artwork. It is music with weight and presence. “Streaming is convenient, but it’s passive,” says 22-year-old Owen from Manchester. “With vinyl, I feel like I’m really listening. Plus, it looks great on the shelf.” The appeal is emotional as much as practical. Vinyl offers a connection to the past, a sense of owning something tangible in a digital world full of fleeting playlists and lost files. Record Store Day has become a cultural event, and vinyl is once again a staple in major retailers like HMV and John Lewis. The Rise of Wargaming Clubs Perhaps more surprising is the quiet resurgence of tabletop wargaming, a hobby long seen as niche. Games like Warhammer 40,000 , Bolt Action , and Star Wars: Legion  are seeing renewed interest. Wargaming combines strategy, creativity, and social interaction, and local clubs across the UK are reporting increased attendance. "We’ve seen a huge influx of new players since the lockdowns eased," says Paul, organiser of a long-running wargaming club in Doncaster. "People are looking for hobbies that get them out of the house and let them be creative and sociable again. Wargaming ticks all those boxes." Many returning players cite nostalgia, often having played as teenagers. Others are completely new, drawn in by detailed models, expansive universes, and a slower, more hands-on hobby than gaming on a console. Social media has helped create vibrant communities, with Instagram feeds full of hand-painted miniatures and YouTube tutorials offering guidance for newcomers. But the core of the hobby remains deeply analogue, with brushes, paint pots, and battles fought on felt-covered tables with measuring tape and imagination. A Desire for the Tangible So what is driving all this? Part of it is digital fatigue. After years of Zoom calls, remote work, and scrolling through social media, many people are actively seeking experiences that feel more present. Board games and vinyl demand attention. Wargaming and model-building take time and patience. There is satisfaction in doing things with your hands, and a mental break in slowing down. There is also a strong current of nostalgia. Even younger generations are embracing retro objects they never grew up with. Film cameras, cassettes, and typewriters are being used not for irony, but for authenticity. These items offer a sense of permanence and identity in a fast-changing digital landscape. Finally, it is about community. Whether through gaming clubs, record shops, or hobby groups, people are coming together again. These are spaces where strangers become friends, where conversation happens face-to-face, and where the pace of life is just a little bit slower. Not Anti-Tech, Just Pro-Choice None of these signals a full rejection of technology. Most of these communities still have a strong online presence. Events are organised through Facebook groups, collections are shared on Reddit, and tutorials are watched on YouTube. But the analogue revival is a reminder that digital convenience is not always enough. In an era when everything is streamed, downloaded, or delivered instantly, there is a growing appreciation for the physical, the deliberate, and the meaningful. Whether it is dropping a needle on a record, placing a game piece on a board, or rolling dice in a miniature war, people are rediscovering what it means to feel present. And in doing so, they are quietly building a future that borrows the best of the past.

It started with a row of birthday cards. While shopping at a local Tesco, I spotted a display full of birthday cards that didn’t look quite right. At first glance, they seemed like any other range of quirky illustrations and sentimental messages, but something was off. The characters had odd expressions, the hands and proportions weren’t quite human, and there was that unmistakable uncanny quality that comes from AI-generated art. I work in the creative industry and regularly use tools like Leonardo AI. I recognised the signs immediately. Every single one of those cards had been made by a machine. It was a quietly shocking moment. Not because AI art exists, we’ve all seen it by now, but because it has gone mainstream, tucked into a supermarket aisle where once there had been work by real illustrators and designers. The thought struck hard: this is already happening, and it’s happening faster than people realise. But as creative work becomes cheaper to generate, a bigger question emerges: when most people have lost their jobs to AI, who will still have the money to buy what these companies are selling? The Jobs at Risk Freelance illustrators designing cards and similar products might typically earn between £30 and £250 per piece, depending on the client and usage. Over the course of a year, a dedicated freelancer might bring in between £25,000 and £35,000, though that varies with commissions and demand. It’s not a high-income job, but it supports a wide network of creative professionals, from recent graduates to long-time freelancers. These are the very people now being undercut by companies using generative AI tools to produce hundreds of designs in hours. AI-generated content is already appearing in online marketplaces, book covers, and even music videos. It’s a quiet revolution, and not one that has left much time for retraining or regulation. If Jobs Go, What Happens Next? The reality is simple: if creative workers lose their incomes, their ability to participate in the economy vanishes with it. One widely discussed solution is Universal Basic Income (UBI). The concept involves giving every citizen a regular, unconditional payment to cover essential living costs. Trials in Finland, Canada and the United States have shown promising results. People were able to focus on long-term goals, retrain, or pursue creative work without the pressure of living month to month. However, critics argue UBI could be expensive to sustain and difficult to fund without significant changes to taxation. Even so, in a world where AI threatens jobs across multiple industries, such support systems may soon become a necessity. New Creative Roles With AI in the Loop Some companies are working towards new hybrid roles. Instead of replacing creative professionals, they aim to involve them in the AI process. Examples include: AI Prompt Artists, who specialise in writing detailed inputs to guide AI tools. Creative Curators, who review AI-generated work and refine it for production. AI Trainers, often artists themselves, who help improve how generative models understand style and composition. While these roles are still emerging, they offer a glimpse into a future where creativity doesn’t disappear, but shifts into new forms. Protecting the Artists Who Came First There’s growing pressure on governments and platforms to protect the rights of original artists. Most AI tools are trained on vast datasets scraped from the internet, often without consent. Several lawsuits are already underway, challenging the legality of this training data. In response, the EU’s AI Act and similar legislation in the UK may soon require greater transparency, and even give artists the option to opt out of training datasets. Some creatives are also calling for a royalties system. Just as musicians earn money when their songs are streamed, visual artists could receive micropayments when their style or content is used in an AI-generated image. Consumer Power and the "Human Made" Movement A growing number of consumers are beginning to notice when something is made by AI. In response, some companies are experimenting with Human Made labels, signalling when a product or design is created without AI tools. This shift could give consumers the power to support real artists directly. Subscription platforms like Patreon and Ko-fi already allow for fan-driven support, and ethical marketplaces are beginning to highlight human creators. But the movement needs wider awareness to have a lasting impact. The Bigger Picture No technology arrives in isolation. AI isn’t just changing how we work; it’s changing how we value work. If companies can produce products without human labour, but also eliminate the spending power of the people they replaced, they risk breaking the cycle that keeps economies turning. The Tesco card display was a small moment, but it points to a much larger shift. As a creative, it made me question where things are heading, and what it might take to ensure there’s still room for real human talent in the world ahead. The machines are here. What happens next is up to us.

Sunset Over Truss Bridge in Vietnam, Photo by Đan Thy Nguyễn Mai: https://www.pexels.com/photo/sunset-over-truss-bridge-in-vietnam-32476661/ Bridge engineering has seen some of the greatest improvements in the entire architectural industry, as there have been green innovations that have not only made the process more sustainable but also improved the quality of the bridges being constructed in the 21st century. For decades, the world has been moving towards becoming more eco-friendly as we look for new ways to create structures like the Golden Gate Bridge while having minimal effect on the environment. These new sustainable designs aren’t just about getting a vehicle from point A to B; they’ve now become thriving green spaces. Many modern-day bridges have begun adding elements like solar lighting, shaded seating areas and green grass accents to improve the overall appearance of the structure. This makes them more pleasing to the eye and excuses the fact that they need to be built across picturesque rivers and lakes. This guide will explore modern bridges and how they’ve been engineered to be more sustainable. Continue reading to find out more about how bridges are constructed in the 21st century. Green and Sustainable Bridge Design While many people consider green and sustainable design to be the same thing, they can actually mean different things, but can both be leveraged to benefit the environment. Often, both of these are done simultaneously, but it’s important to know how they differ. Green Design Green design is an approach to building bridges that focuses on minimising the harmful effects it causes to the environment, as well as the health and well-being of humans located close to the build. Extra steps are usually taken to ensure that the air, water, wildlife and other aspects are protected at all times through zero waste construction practices and using sustainable materials. Sustainable Design This is a broader, more holistic approach that considers the environmental, social and economic implications throughout the entire lifecycle of a building like a bridge. This approach is often referred to as the "three pillars of sustainability". An example of this is designing a building that not only uses renewable energy but also promotes occupant wellbeing, provides flexible spaces for future adaptation and contributes positively to the local community.  Principles of Greener Bridge Engineering Bridge engineering should address certain concepts to be considered green and sustainable construction while also ensuring the infrastructure is good enough to cross in a safe and efficient way. Some of these concepts include: Make a positive impact on the environment, the community around it and the people who will experience the bridge on a regular basis. Support multiple forms of transportation, such as bicycles and scooters to promote the use of more eco-friendly vehicles. Built in a way that doesn't use up more natural resources or create more waste than the Earth can handle. Limit land usage, so less of the natural landscape is jeopardised for the construction of the bridge. Consider environmental issues throughout its lifespan. This means during construction, while it is being maintained and if it’s one day replaced or demolished. Ensure that the bridge is affordable to build, operate, maintain, repair and replace. Allow it to generate revenue for the community surrounding it. This can then be put into other aspects to make the area greener. How to Design a Green and Sustainable Bridge Early bridge designs were all about building something that both looked good and was functional, without taking into account the effect it would have on the environment. These bridges, often built from wood or stone, required large quantities of trees to be cut down, leading to deforestation and habitat destruction.  The construction process itself, involving tools and methods that were less precise, also caused soil erosion and sedimentation, impacting water quality. Now, with better quality plant hire  machinery, the process is much more streamlined and accurate. This means that there is less negative impact on the surrounding land. These aspects need to be considered when you’re designing a green and sustainable bridge: Lifecycle and Longevity : Designing for the long term reduces the need for frequent replacement, thereby cutting down on resource consumption, energy use and disruption. Material Selection : Using recycled and corrosion-resistant materials that are locally sourced will lower the carbon emissions of the bridge. Environmental Impact Mitigation : Implement robust erosion control measures during construction that prevent water pollution. Design for effective stormwater management on the bridge deck to prevent runoff from degrading water quality. Renewable Energy : Explore integrating solar panels or small wind turbines to power bridge lighting, monitoring systems or adjacent facilities. LED lighting can also be used for better sight at nighttime. Examples of Green Bridge Engineering 11th Street Bridge Park - Washington D.C Due to its comprehensive integration of environmental sustainability, ecological restoration and community wellbeing, the 11th Street Bridge Park is considered to be eco-friendly. Its mission is deeply rooted in green principle, and it also has a good amount of plantation implemented into its design. One of the main features of this bridge is Stormwater Management and Water Quality Improvement. The bridge incorporates features specifically designed to improve the health of the Anacostia River. This includes: Water filtration systems : Some elements of the design are linked to systems that actively filter water, helping to clean the river. New wetland areas : Adjacent to the bridge piers, new wetlands are being created. Wetlands are natural purifiers, filtering pollutants and providing critical habitat. Rainwater capture for irrigation : The park will capture rainwater  to be used for irrigating the extensive landscaping, minimising the need for potable water. The Onion Ditch Bridge - Logan County, Ohio The Onion Ditch Bridge in Logan County, Ohio, is considered a green bridge primarily due to its innovative use of 100% recycled materials in its construction. It’s made from 80% post-consumer plastics, such as detergent bottles, shampoo bottles and milk jugs. The other 20% is comprised of recycled car bumpers and dashboards, which diverts a significant amount of waste from landfills Mile End Green Bridge - London, UK Unlike a typical concrete or steel pedestrian bridge, the Mile End Green Bridge literally carries the landscape of Mile End Park over the busy A11 Mile End Road. It has soil, grass, trees and other planting on its surface, making it feel like a continuous part of the park rather than a separate structure. The bridge also incorporates features like rainwater harvesting, where water running off the bridge is collected in tanks and recycled to irrigate the planting, reducing the need for external water sources.

Concert Campers, people camping outside concert venues, have become a popular trend. Fans hoping to get front row spots often wait for hours, or even days, before the show. But as this has become more common, so have the problems that come with it. Many fans, artists, and even people on TikTok are now speaking out.  AI Image generated by Leonardo AI It's unhygienic and unsafe Let’s be honest, sleeping outside on the street for a concert is not the cleanest idea. Most campers don’t have access to bathrooms or places to wash their hands. Some even eat and sleep in the same spot for days. On TikTok, fans have shared gross stories from inside the venues. One person said a camper peed in a cup and spilled it on the floor. Another said the pit smelled bad because some people hadn’t showered for days. This kind of situation isn’t fair to other fans, and it creates health and safety risks for everyone at the show. The mess left behind Campers often bring snacks, drinks, chairs, blankets, and even tents. But many don’t clean up after themselves. After the crowd goes in, the area is often left covered in litter. It’s not just a bad look, it’s disrespectful to the venue staff who have to clean it up. If you say you love and respect an artist, leaving a pile of rubbish behind for someone else to deal with doesn’t match that message. It goes against what artists stand for Take Billie Eilish, for example. She hasn’t directly said anything about camping, but she’s very vocal about protecting the environment. She promotes recycling, reducing waste, and being eco-friendly at her shows. But at some of her concerts, fans who camped outside left huge messes behind. It goes completely against what Billie stands for. The barricade isn’t yours Another issue is the attitude that some campers bring into the venue. Because they waited so long outside, they think they “own” the front row. But most venues use general admission rules, meaning it’s first come, first served once doors open. Pushing, shoving, or arguing with other fans about who “deserves” the barricade is not okay. This kind of gatekeeping ruins the vibe for everyone else who just wants to enjoy the show. Fans are speaking out against Concert Campers More and more fans are calling out camping behavior online, especially on TikTok. What used to be seen as “dedication” is now viewed by many as rude, selfish, and unnecessary. People are starting to realise that being a fan doesn’t mean you get to treat others badly or make a mess for someone else to clean up. There are better ways Some venues already use fair systems like numbered wristbands, timed entry, or digital queues. These options help everyone get in more smoothly, and safely, without the need to camp out. It’s time to think twice about concert camping. If it causes health issues, leaves a mess, and creates drama, maybe it’s not worth it.

When Final Fantasy VII Rebirth , Resident Evil 4 , and The Last of Us Part I  hit the shelves, fans knew what they were getting. Nostalgia, polish, and plenty of marketing. But as remakes and remasters continue to dominate release calendars, some are beginning to ask the uncomfortable question: are original ideas in gaming being pushed aside? It is not a new debate, but it is growing louder, especially as independent developers struggle to get noticed and big studios appear more focused on revisiting past successes. A safe bet in uncertain times For publishers, remakes are attractive for obvious reasons. They come with built-in fanbases, familiar characters, and proven mechanics. In a risk-averse industry, where development costs for blockbuster titles regularly exceed £100 million, returning to a game that worked once is seen as a safer investment than creating something from scratch. “When you consider the cost of failure, a remake of a well-loved game starts to look like a smart move,” says Maria Lowe, a game development consultant based in Sheffield. “You already know there’s an audience, you already have the world-building in place, and it often just comes down to updating graphics and systems.” In some cases, those updates are more substantial. The Resident Evil  remakes, for example, have not only overhauled visuals and controls but also made significant narrative changes. Critics have praised them as examples of how to do a remake well, reinterpreting rather than simply recycling. But not all efforts are as ambitious. Some titles are essentially repackaged versions of the originals, sometimes sold at full price, and with minimal new content. In 2023, The Last of Us Part I  was re-released less than a decade after the original PS4 remaster, raising eyebrows among players who questioned whether graphical upgrades alone justified the £70 price tag. Remakes: A risk to creativity? The concern for many players is not that remakes exist, but that they are becoming the dominant form of output for major studios. Looking at recent and upcoming releases, many of the biggest titles are either remakes, sequels, or adaptations. From Metal Gear Solid Δ  to Silent Hill 2 , the trend is hard to ignore. Meanwhile, wholly original AAA games — those not based on existing properties — have become relatively rare. “It used to be that the biggest games each year were new ideas. Now they’re mostly remakes or sequels,” says Chris Molyneux, who runs a retro gaming community in Manchester. “I get the nostalgia, but it feels like we’re stuck in a loop.” There are exceptions. Elden Ring  and Death Stranding , for example, offered fresh concepts from big-name creators. But these are often the outliers, not the norm. Independent developers are still innovating, of course, but they often lack the marketing power and visibility of the major publishers. A groundbreaking game made by a small team can still struggle to find an audience in a marketplace dominated by familiar titles. What players want Remakes do sell — and often sell well. Capcom reported that Resident Evil 4 Remake  sold over five million copies in its first year. Meanwhile, Square Enix’s remake of Final Fantasy VII  has been a commercial success across multiple instalments. For many players, these releases are welcome. They offer a chance to relive games from their youth, often with improvements that make them more accessible or enjoyable. In some cases, they provide an introduction to classic titles for younger audiences who missed them the first time around. “Not everyone had a PS1 or a GameCube,” says Zara Hopkins, a game streamer based in Leeds. “A good remake means a new generation gets to experience a story that deserves to be remembered.” But there is a line between celebrating the past and ignoring the present. When most major releases each year are remakes or remasters, players may start to wonder what they are missing out on. A balancing act Game studios are in a tough position. Rising costs, cautious investors, and high player expectations make remakes an appealing solution. But an industry that relies too heavily on its past may find itself stagnating. There is also the risk that younger studios and original IPs are pushed to the margins. Creative risk-taking is vital for any medium to evolve, but it becomes harder to justify when publishers can rely on nostalgia-fuelled hits. Some have suggested that remakes could support creativity, rather than replace it. A financially successful remake could, in theory, fund the development of new projects. But whether that happens depends on priorities set behind closed doors. At the moment, the market still seems to reward familiarity. Looking ahead The remake trend shows no signs of slowing down. With titles like Max Payne , Knights of the Old Republic , and even Minecraft  being rumoured or confirmed for re-releases, publishers are clearly banking on our collective appetite for the past. But players are also showing signs of fatigue. On forums and social media, the excitement that once greeted remakes has become more cautious. Fans are asking for balance, not the abandonment of remakes, but a future where they sit alongside, not instead of, fresh ideas. In the end, the gaming industry, like any other, will reflect the audience it serves. If players keep buying remakes, publishers will keep making them. But if demand shifts towards originality and experimentation, studios may be forced to rethink the formula. Whether that shift happens or not is, for now, anyone’s game.

There are people who train ferrets to run through drainpipes, others who iron shirts on mountain tops, and at least one society in Cumbria dedicated to racing wheelbarrows in full Edwardian dress. Cheese Rolling image by ninjawil on Flickr Britain has long had a reputation for eccentric pastimes, but many of these niche hobbies are far more serious, and far more competitive, than they first appear. From toe wrestling to conker championships, welcome to the quietly intense world of niche hobby competitions, where pride, planning, and decades-old rivalries are very much in play. From Oddity to Obsession What might look like a bit of harmless fun at the village fête often hides a fierce undercurrent of strategy and commitment. Take the World Toe Wrestling Championships , held each summer in Derbyshire. Established in 1976, the sport involves two barefoot opponents locking toes and trying to pin each other’s foot down. Matches are officiated. Spectators gather. There are title holders. Training is involved. A collection of Toe Wrestling Trophies, image from Wiki Commons Then there is the World Pea Shooting Championship , hosted annually in Witcham, Cambridgeshire. Competitors use laser-guided blowpipes to shoot dried peas at a target board. The record to beat is three perfect shots. The youngest entrant on record was just four years old. The oldest? In his nineties. “It looks silly from the outside, but there’s real skill involved,” says Norman Hartley, who has competed in the event since 1994. “You have to factor in wind speed, moisture in the peas, and keep your aim steady. It’s not just puff and pray.” It’s almost like being in on a joke the rest of the world hasn’t clocked yet. But you also get quite good at it. Why We Love the Weird Sociologists suggest that niche hobbies, especially competitive ones, satisfy a deep need for identity, ritual, and community. In a world that often feels chaotic, small traditions offer structure and shared purpose. “There’s something very human about inventing a new way to compete,” says Dr Elaine Keating, a behavioural psychologist at Leeds Beckett University. “Niche hobbies often start as a joke or tradition, but over time they become a point of pride. And when you’re the best in the world at something — even if it’s underwater knitting — that title still means something.” In many cases, these hobbies have decades of history. Some, like cheese rolling at Cooper’s Hill  in Gloucestershire, have origins dating back to pagan festivals. Others were started on a whim and simply stuck. The Extreme Ironing Bureau , founded in Leicester in 1997, was initially a satirical art piece. It soon developed a following, with people ironing in forests, on mountains, and mid-skydiving jumps. Even new hobbies are finding their moment. The rise of social media has introduced global audiences to competitions such as spoon balancing , speed cubing , competitive duck herding , and air guitar battles , all of which now boast global events, livestreams, and sponsorship deals. A Bit of Britishness Many of these hobbies reflect something quietly British: a love of the underdog, the eccentric, and the proudly impractical. The World Stone Skimming Championships , held on Easdale Island in Scotland, welcomes competitors from around the world each September. To qualify, the stone must skip at least twice across the water. Skimming experts bring specially chosen slate discs, sometimes wrapped in chamois leather for grip. Officials measure every bounce with tape and telescope. The British Lawnmower Racing Association , meanwhile, oversees dozens of events each year, including endurance races. Competitors remove the cutting blades, kit themselves out in protective gear, and race around muddy fields at speeds of up to 50 mph. The prize? Usually a trophy, sometimes a pint, always bragging rights. What Drives People? One constant across these competitions is a strong sense of belonging. “ You come for the novelty, but you stay for the people ,” says Kat McGill, a champion in the UK Rock Paper Scissors League . “ There’s a shared absurdity. It’s almost like being in on a joke the rest of the world hasn’t clocked yet. But you also get quite good at it, and then you want to win .” Many hobbyists also point out that these events are deeply inclusive. Unlike mainstream sports, niche competitions often level the playing field, allowing people of all ages and backgrounds to take part. In many cases, newcomers are welcomed with open arms and a set of surprisingly detailed rules. More Than a Laugh It is easy to dismiss niche hobbyists as eccentric or unserious. But to those who compete, these events are more than a weekend lark. They are social lifelines, creative outlets, or reminders that joy can be found in the unlikeliest of places. In an era dominated by screens and scrolling, getting together for a bog snorkelling championship or a black pudding toss is, perhaps, more important than it sounds. And as long as there are people willing to balance eggs, race snails, or build tiny vegetable cars, the spirit of niche British competitiveness is likely to keep rolling. Quite literally, in the case of the cheese. Would you like image suggestions for this piece as well, or perhaps a list of real UK events or locations readers could visit if they wanted to experience these hobbies in person?

Ozzy Osbourne, born John Michael Osbourne, passed away on 22 July 2025  at age 76. He was surrounded by his family in his native England, leaving behind a legacy that changed music forever. The Birth of Heavy Metal Raised in the industrial city of Birmingham, Ozzy co‑founded Black Sabbath  in 1968. With guitarist Tony Iommi, bassist Geezer Butler and drummer Bill Ward, they created a darker, heavier sound unlike anything heard before. Their 1970 debut album Black Sabbath , followed by Paranoid  and Master of Reality , laid the blueprint for what became known as heavy metal. Ozzy’s haunting vocals and the band’s ominous imagery struck a chord with listeners and alarmed parents, giving birth to a cultural phenomenon. Songs such as Iron Man , Paranoid  and War Pigs  remain genre touchstones. Solo Career and Wild Behaviour Black Sabbath fired Ozzy in 1979 after years of missed rehearsals and substance issues. He rebounded with his solo debut, Blizzard of Ozz  (1980), which included the anthem Crazy Train . His follow‑up Diary of a Madman  continued his solo success. Ozzy also became infamous for outrageous acts. In 1982 at a show in Iowa he bit the head off a bat, believing it to be a toy. He was hospitalised and given rabies shots . A year earlier he had bitten the head off two doves during a CBS Records meeting. Another infamous story from a Motley Crüe tour says he snorted a line of ants off a hotel floor in a bid to outdo his rock‑star reputation. Despite the chaos, Ozzy said in 1992, "All the stuff onstage, the craziness, it's all just a role that I play, my work; I am not the Antichrist; I am a family man". Ozzfest and Reality TV Fame In 1996 Ozzy and his wife Sharon launched Ozzfest , a touring heavy metal festival that ran almost every year through 2008, and later returned in select years into the 2010s. It gave exposure to many now‑major metal bands. Ozzy had a career resurgence in the early 2000s, starring with his family in MTV’s reality series The Osbournes  (2002–2005), revealing his chaotic but warm domestic life in Hollywood. He duetted with daughter Kelly on a version of the Sabbath song Changes  in 2003. Reunion with Black Sabbath Ozzy reunited with Black Sabbath for short appearances in 1992 and then formally in 1997, touring and releasing the Reunion  album. The original line‑up returned again in 2011–2013 for the album 13  and a world tour. Their final proper tour, The End Tour , ran from 2016 to early 2017, concluding in Birmingham. Final Concert: Back to the Beginning On 5 July 2025 , Black Sabbath’s original members reunited for a final, charity concert at Villa Park in Birmingham, billed Back to the Beginning . Ozzy performed from a throne due to Parkinson’s and spinal complications and opened with, "Let the madness begin". He told the crowd, "You have no idea how I feel. Thank you from the bottom of my heart". The festival featured many acts he had inspired, including Metallica, Guns N’ Roses, Slayer and Alice in Chains. The event raised around £140 million  ($190 million) for Cure Parkinson’s, Birmingham Children’s Hospital and Acorns Hospice. Ozzy’s son Louis described the night as “mindblowing” and said he was moved to tears by his father’s performance. eath and Legacy Less than three weeks later, Ozzy died peacefully at home on 22 July 2025 , surrounded by loved ones. His family released a statement saying, "It is with more sadness than mere words can convey…". Tributes poured in from peers, fans and generations influenced by him. Elton John called him a huge trailblazer and one of the funniest people he ever met. James Hetfield of Metallica said, “Without Sabbath, there would be no Metallica”. He was twice inducted into the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame , first with Black Sabbath in 2006 and then as a solo artist in 2024. Other honours include the UK Music Hall of Fame, the Ivor Novello Lifetime Award, five Grammies, and Classic Rock’s Living Legend prize. Not Bad for a Lad from Birmingham Ozzy Osbourne transformed from a factory‑town teenager into the founder of heavy metal, a global solo star, and a figure embraced by popular culture. His music changed the face of rock, his persona personified rebellion, and his family life revealed a man both absurd and endearing. From biting bats and snorting ants, to building an empire of festivals and redefining fame through reality TV, Ozzy lived fast and gave more. His farewell in Birmingham brought the band home, earning hundreds of millions for charity and offering a final salute to the fans who had shaped him. Ozzy once said survival was his legacy. In life and in music, he never bowed down, he never stopped performing, and he will be remembered as rock’s Prince of Darkness, a survivor to the very end.